Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Imane Lamrani

dblp:223/6633 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0002-0003-066XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Embedded and real-time systems · 100%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Program verification
model-based verification
0.412020
Toward Operational Safety Verification of AI-Enabled CPS (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2020
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical systems
0.412020
Toward Operational Safety Verification of AI-Enabled CPS (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.112020
Toward Operational Safety Verification of AI-Enabled CPS (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2020
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › AI safety
safety assurance
0.112020
Toward Operational Safety Verification of AI-Enabled CPS (Student Abstract) · AAAI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

model-based verification · 1.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Towards Certified Safe Personalization in Learning-Enabled Human-in-the-loop Human-in-the-plant Systems
abstract
This article presents an AI-enabled Personalization Management (AIIM) software for human-in-the-loop, human-in-the-plant learning-enabled systems (LES). AIIM can be integrated with LES software to aid a human user in achieving safe and effective operation under dynamically changing contexts. AIIM consists of: (a) an AI technique to derive model coefficient of a physics-guided surrogate model from operational data shared following privacy norms, and (b) continuous model conformance to identify key changes in LES operational behavior that may jeopardize safety. We demonstrate two capabilities of AIIM, personalization and unknown error detection, through case studies that span a significant breadth of dynamic context change scenarios including (a) involuntary change in user context such as medication-induced glucose metabolism change in automated insulin delivery (AID), (b) actuation failure such as cartridge blockage in AID, (c) latent sensor error in aviation, and (d) unknown coding error in autonomous car software patches. We compare AIIM personalization with human-in-the-loop and self-adaptive model-predictive control design in real-life and simulation settings, to show safe and improved diabetes management.
Ayan Banerjee 0001, Aranyak Maity, Imane Lamrani, Sandeep K. S. Gupta
ACM J. Emerg. Technol. Comput. Syst.3
2024 Synthesizing Operationally Safe Controllers for Human-in-the-Loop Human-in-the-Plant Hybrid Close Loop Systems
Ayan Banerjee 0001, Imane Lamrani, Sandeep K. S. Gupta
ICPR (29)2
2021 Operational Data-Driven Feedback for Safety Evaluation of Agent-Based Cyber-Physical Systems
abstract
Safety regulation of safety-critical agent-based cyber-physical systems (CPS) which are manufactured in large scale such as next-gen aircrafts, autonomous driving vehicles, and medical devices is a multifaceted problem. CPS deployments can be presented with new safety-critical scenarios and novel inputs. Hence, operational characteristics of the CPS can be quite different from its safety approved design. This article considers a safety assurance solution where operational data from the sensors and actuators in the field of deployment is fed back to the manufacturing process through the Internet of Things infrastructure to assure and improve operational safety. It considers two cases: 1) model-aware, where the safety assured CPS design is fully specified; 2) modelagnostic, where limited specifications exist. For both the cases, it presents a data science based approach, N-HyMn, that learns a hybrid automaton model of the operational characteristics of the CPS from the input/output (I/O) traces of the observable parameters. For the model-aware case, it investigates the presence of inconsistencies between the learned model and the specifications model provided by the manufacturer, thus facilitating the detection of safety problems that may have been overlooked. For the modelagnostic case, it can detect potential safety failures. We show the usage of N-HyMn on the Medtronic Minimed 670 G system. N-HyMn correctly infers the hybrid automaton specifications of the Minimed 670 G and was able to detect a self-adaptation mechanism that is not declared explicitly in the certification documents of the U Food and Drug Administration. N-HyMn has a computational complexity of O(kn2), where k is the number of samples in the I/O trace, and n is the number of continuous variables.
Imane Lamrani, Ayan Banerjee 0001, Sandeep K. S. Gupta
IEEE Trans. Ind. Informatics1
2020 Toward Operational Safety Verification of AI-Enabled CPS (Student Abstract)
abstract
AI-enabled Cyber-physical systems (CPS) such as artificial pancreas (AP) or autonomous cars are using machine learning to make several critical decisions. The system is subject to inputs and scenarios which are not observed during training and the expected outputs are not known. Hence, popular model based verification techniques that characterize behavior of a control system before deployment using predictive models may be inaccurate and often result in incorrect safety analysis results. In addition, regulatory agencies are required to regulate safety-critical AI enabled CPS to ensure their operational safety. However, high complexity of the system result in myriad of safety concerns all of which may not only be comprehensively tested before deployment but also may not even be detected during design and testing phase. In this work, we propose a tool to help regulatory agencies compare the operation of the CPS with the specifications given by the manufacturer to ensure that the operation results conform with the safety assured design of a CPS.
Imane Lamrani, Ayan Banerjee 0001, Sandeep K. S. Gupta
AAAI1
2020 AI Enabled Tutor for Accessible Training
Ayan Banerjee 0001, Imane Lamrani, Sameena Hossain, Prajwal Paudyal, Sandeep K. S. Gupta
AIED (1)2