Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Andrew R. Ghazi
dblp:223/8279
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-8888-946XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
association testing |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | High-sensitivity pattern discovery in large, paired multiomic datasets · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
multi-omics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | High-sensitivity pattern discovery in large, paired multiomic datasets · Bioinform. 2022 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Design tools for MPRA experiments · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
massively parallel reporter assay |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Design tools for MPRA experiments · Bioinform. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hierarchical hypothesis testing · 0.6power analysis · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Learning and teaching biological data science in the Bioconductor communityabstractModern biological research is increasingly data-intensive, leading to a growing demand for effective training in biological data science. In this article, we provide an overview of key resources and best practices available within the Bioconductor project-an open-source software community focused on omics data analysis. This guide serves as a valuable reference for both learners and educators in the field. Jenny Drnevich, Frederick Tan, Fabricio Almeida-Silva, Robert Castelo, Aedín C. Culhane, Sean R. Davis, Maria A. Doyle, Ludwig Geistlinger, Andrew R. Ghazi, Susan P. Holmes, Leo Lahti, Alexandru Mahmoud, Kozo Nishida, Marcel Ramos, Kevin C. Rue-Albrecht, David J. H. Shih, Laurent Gatto, Charlotte Soneson |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 9 |
| 2022 | High-sensitivity pattern discovery in large, paired multiomic datasetsabstractMOTIVATION: Modern biological screens yield enormous numbers of measurements, and identifying and interpreting statistically significant associations among features are essential. In experiments featuring multiple high-dimensional datasets collected from the same set of samples, it is useful to identify groups of associated features between the datasets in a way that provides high statistical power and false discovery rate (FDR) control. RESULTS: Here, we present a novel hierarchical framework, HAllA (Hierarchical All-against-All association testing), for structured association discovery between paired high-dimensional datasets. HAllA efficiently integrates hierarchical hypothesis testing with FDR correction to reveal significant linear and non-linear block-wise relationships among continuous and/or categorical data. We optimized and evaluated HAllA using heterogeneous synthetic datasets of known association structure, where HAllA outperformed all-against-all and other block-testing approaches across a range of common similarity measures. We then applied HAllA to a series of real-world multiomics datasets, revealing new associations between gene expression and host immune activity, the microbiome and host transcriptome, metabolomic profiling and human health phenotypes. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An open-source implementation of HAllA is freely available at http://huttenhower.sph.harvard.edu/halla along with documentation, demo datasets and a user group. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Andrew R. Ghazi, Kathleen Sucipto, Gholamali Rahnavard, Eric A. Franzosa, Lauren J. McIver, Jason Lloyd-Price, Emma H. Schwager, George Weingart, Yo Sup Moon, Xochitl C. Morgan, Levi Waldron, Curtis Huttenhower |
Bioinform. | 1 |
| 2020 | Bayesian modelling of high-throughput sequencing assays with malacodaabstractNGS studies have uncovered an ever-growing catalog of human variation while leaving an enormous gap between observed variation and experimental characterization of variant function. High-throughput screens powered by NGS have greatly increased the rate of variant functionalization, but the development of comprehensive statistical methods to analyze screen data has lagged. In the massively parallel reporter assay (MPRA), short barcodes are counted by sequencing DNA libraries transfected into cells and the cell's output RNA in order to simultaneously measure the shifts in transcription induced by thousands of genetic variants. These counts present many statistical challenges, including overdispersion, depth dependence, and uncertain DNA concentrations. So far, the statistical methods used have been rudimentary, employing transformations on count level data and disregarding experimental and technical structure while failing to quantify uncertainty in the statistical model. We have developed an extensive framework for the analysis of NGS functionalization screens available as an R package called malacoda (available from github.com/andrewGhazi/malacoda). Our software implements a probabilistic, fully Bayesian model of screen data. The model uses the negative binomial distribution with gamma priors to model sequencing counts while accounting for effects from input library preparation and sequencing depth. The method leverages the high-throughput nature of the assay to estimate the priors empirically. External annotations such as ENCODE data or DeepSea predictions can also be incorporated to obtain more informative priors-a transformative capability for data integration. The package also includes quality control and utility functions, including automated barcode counting and visualization methods. To validate our method, we analyzed several datasets using malacoda and alternative MPRA analysis methods. These data include experiments from the literature, simulated assays, and primary MPRA data. We also used luciferase assays to experimentally validate several hits from our primary data, as well as variants for which the various methods disagree and variants detectable only with the aid of external annotations. Andrew R. Ghazi, Xianguo Kong, Edward S. Chen, Leonard C. Edelstein, Chad A. Shaw |
PLoS Comput. Biol. | 1 |
| 2018 | Design tools for MPRA experimentsabstractMotivation: Genetic reporter assays are a convenient, relatively inexpensive method for studying the regulation of gene expression. Massively Parallel Reporter Assays (MPRA) are high-throughput functionalization assays that interrogate the transcriptional activity of many genetic variants at once using a library of synthetic barcoded constructs. Despite growing interest in this area, there are few computational tools to design and execute MPRA studies. Results: We designed an online web-tool and R package that allows for interactive MPRA experimental design encompassing both power analysis and design of constructs. Our tool is tuned using data from real MPRA studies. Users can adjust experimental parameters to examine the predicted effect on assay power as well as upload VCFs for automated construct sequence generation. Availability and implementation: The MPRA Design Tools web application is available here: https://andrewghazi.shinyapps.io/designmpra/, https://github.com/andrewGhazi/designMPRA and https://github.com/andrewGhazi/mpradesigntools. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Andrew R. Ghazi, Edward S. Chen, David M. Henke, Namrata Madan, Leonard C. Edelstein, Chad A. Shaw |
Bioinform. | 1 |