VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Cécile Baritel-Ruet
dblp:224/5707
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 87% Hardware security and side channels · 13% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
hash functions |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Machine-Checked Proofs for Cryptographic Standards: Indifferentiability of Sponge and Secure High-Assurance Implementations of SHA-3 · CCS 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › cryptographic foundations › cryptographic models
indifferentiability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Machine-Checked Proofs for Cryptographic Standards: Indifferentiability of Sponge and Secure High-Assurance Implementations of SHA-3 · CCS 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › hash functions › dedicated hash functions
keccak |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Machine-Checked Proofs for Cryptographic Standards: Indifferentiability of Sponge and Secure High-Assurance Implementations of SHA-3 · CCS 2019 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
provable security |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Machine-Checked Proofs for Cryptographic Standards: Indifferentiability of Sponge and Secure High-Assurance Implementations of SHA-3 · CCS 2019 |
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel countermeasures
timing attack resistance |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Machine-Checked Proofs for Cryptographic Standards: Indifferentiability of Sponge and Secure High-Assurance Implementations of SHA-3 · CCS 2019 |
Hardware security and side channels › side-channel attack
timing side channel |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Machine-Checked Proofs for Cryptographic Standards: Indifferentiability of Sponge and Secure High-Assurance Implementations of SHA-3 · CCS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
jasmin · 0.4indifferentiability proof · 0.4easycrypt · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Machine-Checked Proofs for Cryptographic Standards: Indifferentiability of Sponge and Secure High-Assurance Implementations of SHA-3abstractWe present a high-assurance and high-speed implementation of the SHA-3 hash function. Our implementation is written in the Jasmin programming language, and is formally verified for functional correctness, provable security and timing attack resistance in the EasyCrypt proof assistant. Our implementation is the first to achieve simultaneously the four desirable properties (efficiency, correctness, provable security, and side-channel protection) for a non-trivial cryptographic primitive. Concretely, our mechanized proofs show that: 1) the SHA-3 hash function is indifferentiable from a random oracle, and thus is resistant against collision, first and second preimage attacks; 2) the SHA-3 hash function is correctly implemented by a vectorized x86 implementation. Furthermore, the implementation is provably protected against timing attacks in an idealized model of timing leaks. The proofs include new EasyCrypt libraries of independent interest for programmable random oracles and modular indifferentiability proofs. José Bacelar Almeida, Cécile Baritel-Ruet, Manuel Barbosa, Gilles Barthe, François Dupressoir, Benjamin Grégoire, Vincent Laporte, Tiago Oliveira 0004, Alley Stoughton, Pierre-Yves Strub |
CCS | 2 |
| 2018 | Formal Security Proof of CMAC and Its VariantsabstractThe CMAC standard, when initially proposed by Iwata and Kurosawa as OMAC1, was equipped with a complex game-based security proof. Following recent advances in formal verification for game-based security proofs, we formalize a proof of unforgeability for CMAC in EasyCrypt. A side effects of this proof are improvements of EasyCrypt libraries. This formal proof obtains security bounds very similar to Iwata and Kurosawa's for CMAC, but also proves secure a certain number of intermediate constructions of independent interest, including ECBC, FCBC and XCBC. This work represents one more step in the direction of obtaining a reliable set of independently verifiable evidence for the security of international cryptographic standards. Cécile Baritel-Ruet, François Dupressoir, Pierre-Alain Fouque, Benjamin Grégoire |
CSF | 1 |