Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Rudi Poepsel Lemaitre
dblp:224/6684
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1022-9015ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 67% Authentication and access control · 33% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Distributed systems · 91% Parallel and multicore computing · 9% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Data stream processing · 57% Query processing and optimization · 43% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Authentication and access control
access control |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Disclosure-Compliant Query Answering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
data masking |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Disclosure-Compliant Query Answering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024 |
Privacy and data protection
statistical database privacy |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Disclosure-Compliant Query Answering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Fault-Tolerance for Distributed Iterative Dataflows in Action · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
failure recovery |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Fault-Tolerance for Distributed Iterative Dataflows in Action · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Distributed systems
fault tolerance |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Fault-Tolerance for Distributed Iterative Dataflows in Action · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Query processing and optimization
query rewriting |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Disclosure-Compliant Query Answering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024 |
Query processing and optimization
approximate query processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | In the Land of Data Streams where Synopses are Missing, One Framework to Bring Them All · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computation models
distributed dataflow |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Fault-Tolerance for Distributed Iterative Dataflows in Action · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
utility estimation · 1.5relative entropy · 1.5divide-and-conquer · 0.5unblocking checkpointing · 0.3replica recovery · 0.3confined recovery · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Disclosure-Compliant Query AnsweringabstractIn today's data-driven world, organizations face increasing pressure to comply with data disclosure policies, which require data masking measures and robust access control mechanisms. This paper presents Mascara, a middleware for specifying and enforcing data disclosure policies. Mascara extends traditional access control mechanisms with data masking to support partial disclosure of sensitive data. We introduce data masks to specify disclosure policies flexibly and intuitively and propose a query modification approach to rewrite user queries into disclosure-compliant ones. We present a utility estimation framework to estimate the information loss of masked data based on relative entropy, which Mascara leverages to select the disclosure-compliant query that minimizes information loss. Our experimental evaluation shows that Mascara effectively chooses the best disclosure-compliant query with a success rate exceeding 90%, ensuring users get data with the lowest possible information loss. Additionally, Mascara's overhead compared to normal execution without data protection is negligible, staying lower than 300ms even for extreme scenarios with hundreds of possible disclosure-compliant queries. Rudi Poepsel Lemaitre, Kaustubh Beedkar, Volker Markl |
Proc. ACM Manag. Data | 1 |
| 2021 | In the Land of Data Streams where Synopses are Missing, One Framework to Bring Them AllabstractIn pursuit of real-time data analysis, approximate summarization structures, i.e., synopses, have gained importance over the years. However, existing stream processing systems, such as Flink, Spark, and Storm, do not support synopses as first class citizens, i.e., as pipeline operators. Synopses' implementation is upon users. This is mainly because of the diversity of synopses, which makes a unified implementation difficult. We present Condor, a framework that supports synopses as first class citizens. Condor facilitates the specification and processing of synopsis-based streaming jobs while hiding all internal processing details. Condor's key component is its model that represents synopses as a particular case of windowed aggregate functions. An inherent divide and conquer strategy allows Condor to efficiently distribute the computation, allowing for high-performance and linear scalability. Our evaluation shows that Condor outperforms existing approaches by up to a factor of 75x and that it scales linearly with the number of cores. Rudi Poepsel Lemaitre, Martin Kiefer, Joscha Von Hein, Jorge-Arnulfo Quiané-Ruiz, Volker Markl |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |
| 2018 | Fault-Tolerance for Distributed Iterative Dataflows in ActionabstractDistributed dataflow systems (DDS) are widely employed in graph processing and machine learning (ML), where many of these algorithms are iterative in nature. Typically, DDS achieve fault-tolerance using checkpointing mechanisms or they exploit algorithmic properties to enable fault-tolerance without the need for checkpoints. Recently, for graph processing, we proposed utilizing unblocking checkpointing , to parallelize the execution pipeline and checkpoint writing, as well as confined recovery , to enable fast recovery upon partial node failures. Furthermore, for ML algorithms implemented using broadcast variables, we proposed utilizing replica recovery , to leverage broadcast variable replicas and facilitate failure recovery checkpointing-free. In this demonstration, we showcase these fault-tolerance techniques using Apache Flink. Attendees will be able to: (i) run representative iterative algorithms including PageRank, Connected Components, and K-Means, (ii) explore the internal behavior of DDS under the influence of unblocking checkpointing, and (iii) trigger failures, to observe the effects of confined recovery and replica recovery. Chen Xu 0001, Rudi Poepsel Lemaitre, Juan Soto 0001, Volker Markl |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 2 |