Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rudi Poepsel Lemaitre

dblp:224/6684 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-1022-9015ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
1 paper
Privacy and data protection · 67% Authentication and access control · 33%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 91% Parallel and multicore computing · 9%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data stream processing · 57% Query processing and optimization · 43%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Authentication and access control
access control
0.812024
Disclosure-Compliant Query Answering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Privacy and data protection
data masking
0.812024
Disclosure-Compliant Query Answering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Privacy and data protection
statistical database privacy
0.812024
Disclosure-Compliant Query Answering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
checkpointing
0.312018
Fault-Tolerance for Distributed Iterative Dataflows in Action · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018
Distributed systems › fault tolerance
failure recovery
0.312018
Fault-Tolerance for Distributed Iterative Dataflows in Action · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018
Distributed systems
fault tolerance
0.312018
Fault-Tolerance for Distributed Iterative Dataflows in Action · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018
Query processing and optimization
query rewriting
0.212024
Disclosure-Compliant Query Answering · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Query processing and optimization
approximate query processing
0.112021
In the Land of Data Streams where Synopses are Missing, One Framework to Bring Them All · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2021
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel computation models
distributed dataflow
0.112018
Fault-Tolerance for Distributed Iterative Dataflows in Action · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

utility estimation · 1.5relative entropy · 1.5divide-and-conquer · 0.5unblocking checkpointing · 0.3replica recovery · 0.3confined recovery · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Disclosure-Compliant Query Answering
abstract
In today's data-driven world, organizations face increasing pressure to comply with data disclosure policies, which require data masking measures and robust access control mechanisms. This paper presents Mascara, a middleware for specifying and enforcing data disclosure policies. Mascara extends traditional access control mechanisms with data masking to support partial disclosure of sensitive data. We introduce data masks to specify disclosure policies flexibly and intuitively and propose a query modification approach to rewrite user queries into disclosure-compliant ones. We present a utility estimation framework to estimate the information loss of masked data based on relative entropy, which Mascara leverages to select the disclosure-compliant query that minimizes information loss. Our experimental evaluation shows that Mascara effectively chooses the best disclosure-compliant query with a success rate exceeding 90%, ensuring users get data with the lowest possible information loss. Additionally, Mascara's overhead compared to normal execution without data protection is negligible, staying lower than 300ms even for extreme scenarios with hundreds of possible disclosure-compliant queries.
Rudi Poepsel Lemaitre, Kaustubh Beedkar, Volker Markl
Proc. ACM Manag. Data1
2021 In the Land of Data Streams where Synopses are Missing, One Framework to Bring Them All
abstract
In pursuit of real-time data analysis, approximate summarization structures, i.e., synopses, have gained importance over the years. However, existing stream processing systems, such as Flink, Spark, and Storm, do not support synopses as first class citizens, i.e., as pipeline operators. Synopses' implementation is upon users. This is mainly because of the diversity of synopses, which makes a unified implementation difficult. We present Condor, a framework that supports synopses as first class citizens. Condor facilitates the specification and processing of synopsis-based streaming jobs while hiding all internal processing details. Condor's key component is its model that represents synopses as a particular case of windowed aggregate functions. An inherent divide and conquer strategy allows Condor to efficiently distribute the computation, allowing for high-performance and linear scalability. Our evaluation shows that Condor outperforms existing approaches by up to a factor of 75x and that it scales linearly with the number of cores.
Rudi Poepsel Lemaitre, Martin Kiefer, Joscha Von Hein, Jorge-Arnulfo Quiané-Ruiz, Volker Markl
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2018 Fault-Tolerance for Distributed Iterative Dataflows in Action
abstract
Distributed dataflow systems (DDS) are widely employed in graph processing and machine learning (ML), where many of these algorithms are iterative in nature. Typically, DDS achieve fault-tolerance using checkpointing mechanisms or they exploit algorithmic properties to enable fault-tolerance without the need for checkpoints. Recently, for graph processing, we proposed utilizing unblocking checkpointing , to parallelize the execution pipeline and checkpoint writing, as well as confined recovery , to enable fast recovery upon partial node failures. Furthermore, for ML algorithms implemented using broadcast variables, we proposed utilizing replica recovery , to leverage broadcast variable replicas and facilitate failure recovery checkpointing-free. In this demonstration, we showcase these fault-tolerance techniques using Apache Flink. Attendees will be able to: (i) run representative iterative algorithms including PageRank, Connected Components, and K-Means, (ii) explore the internal behavior of DDS under the influence of unblocking checkpointing, and (iii) trigger failures, to observe the effects of confined recovery and replica recovery.
Chen Xu 0001, Rudi Poepsel Lemaitre, Juan Soto 0001, Volker Markl
Proc. VLDB Endow.2