VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Shivmaran S. Pandian
dblp:224/8847
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0008-5788-8879ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 4 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Graph learning · 62% Efficient and distributed learning · 38% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 50% Distributed systems · 50% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph neural network
dynamic graph neural network |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient scaling of dynamic graph neural networks · SC 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › communication-efficient training
communication optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient scaling of dynamic graph neural networks · SC 2021 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient scaling of dynamic graph neural networks · SC 2021 |
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning › distributed training
distributed GNN training |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient scaling of dynamic graph neural networks · SC 2021 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
multi-GPU computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Efficient scaling of dynamic graph neural networks · SC 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
graph difference-based strategy · 1.0data distribution technique · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Efficient Translation of Long Code Blocks Using Large Language Models
Venkatesan T. Chakaravarthy, Anamitra R. Choudhury, Vini Kanvar, Rami Katan, Shivmaran S. Pandian, Aditya Raghuvanshi, Yogish Sabharwal |
SANER | 5 |
| 2021 | Efficient scaling of dynamic graph neural networksabstractWe present distributed algorithms for training dynamic Graph Neural Networks (GNN) on large scale graphs spanning multi-node, multi-GPU systems. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first scaling study on dynamic GNN. We devise mechanisms for reducing the GPU memory usage and identify two execution time bottlenecks: CPU-GPU data transfer; and communication volume. Exploiting properties of dynamic graphs, we design a graph difference-based strategy to significantly reduce the transfer time. We develop a simple, but effective data distribution technique under which the communication volume remains fixed and linear in the input size, for any number of GPUs. Our experiments using billion-size graphs on a system of 128 GPUs shows that: (i) the distribution scheme achieves up to 30x speedup on 128 GPUs; (ii) the graph-difference technique reduces the transfer time by a factor of up to 4.1x and the overall execution time by up to 40%. Venkatesan T. Chakaravarthy, Shivmaran S. Pandian, Saurabh Raje, Yogish Sabharwal, Toyotaro Suzumura, Shashanka Ubaru |
SC | 2 |
| 2019 | On optimizing distributed non-negative Tucker decompositionabstractThe Tucker decomposition generalizes singular value decomposition (SVD) to high dimensional tensors. It factorizes a given N-dimensional tensor as the product of a small core tensor and a set of N factor matrices. Non-negative Tucker Decomposition (NTD) is a variant that imposes the constraint that the entries of the core and the factor matrices must be non-negative. Generalizing a classical algorithm from the domain of non-negative matrix factorization, Mørup et al. [19] designed a procedure for NTD via the multiplicative weight update paradigm. Based on the above procedure, we present a distributed implementation of NTD for sparse tensors. We develop three algorithms for efficiently executing the procedure. The first is a baseline algorithm that adapts strategies from prior work on the Tucker decomposition. The other two are improved algorithms that are optimized based on properties unique to the NTD procedure. We present an experimental evaluation on a benchmark of large real-life tensors on a system with 32 to 512 MPI ranks. The study shows that the optimized algorithms outperform the baseline by a factor of up to 6x in execution time. The distributed implementation scales well with speedup up to 12x (as against an ideal factor of 16x). Venkatesan T. Chakaravarthy, Shivmaran S. Pandian, Saurabh Raje, Yogish Sabharwal |
ICS | 2 |
| 2018 | Improved Distributed Algorithm for Graph Truss Decomposition
Venkatesan T. Chakaravarthy, Aashish Goyal, Prakash Murali, Shivmaran S. Pandian, Yogish Sabharwal |
Euro-Par | 4 |
| 2018 | On Optimizing Distributed Tucker Decomposition for Sparse TensorsabstractThe Tucker decomposition generalizes the notion of Singular Value Decomposition (SVD) to tensors, the higher dimensional analogues of matrices. We study the problem of constructing the Tucker decomposition of sparse tensors on distributed memory systems via the HOOI procedure, a popular iterative method. The scheme used for distributing the input tensor among the processors (MPI ranks) critically influences the HOOI execution time. Prior work has proposed different distribution schemes: an offline scheme based on sophisticated hypergraph partitioning method and simple, lightweight alternatives that can be used real-time. While the hypergraph based scheme typically results in faster HOOI execution time, being complex, the time taken for determining the distribution is an order of magnitude higher than the execution time of a single HOOI iteration. Our main contribution is a lightweight distribution scheme, which achieves the best of both worlds. We show that the scheme is near-optimal on certain fundamental metrics associated with the HOOI procedure and as a result, near-optimal on the computational load (FLOPs). Though the scheme may incur higher communication volume, the computation time is the dominant factor and as the result, the scheme achieves better performance on the overall HOOI execution time. Our experimental evaluation on large real-life tensors (having up to 4 billion elements) shows that the scheme outperforms the prior schemes on the HOOI execution time by a factor of up to 3x. On the other hand, its distribution time is comparable to the prior lightweight schemes and is typically lesser than the execution time of a single HOOI iteration. Venkatesan T. Chakaravarthy, Jee W. Choi, Douglas J. Joseph, Prakash Murali, Shivmaran S. Pandian, Yogish Sabharwal, Dheeraj Sreedhar |
ICS | 5 |