Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Colin Ahern
dblp:224/9433
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
2 papers |
Usable security · 64% Systems and software security · 28% Network security · 8% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Usable security › security operations
incident response |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | How Ready is Your Ready? Assessing the Usability of Incident Response Playbook Frameworks · CHI 2022 |
Systems and software security › security engineering
threat modeling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | The Battle for New York: A Case Study of Applied Digital Threat Modeling at the Enterprise Level · USENIX Security Symposium 2018 |
Usable security › security operations
security operations center |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | How Ready is Your Ready? Assessing the Usability of Incident Response Playbook Frameworks · CHI 2022 |
Network security › moving target defense
cyber defense |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | The Battle for New York: A Case Study of Applied Digital Threat Modeling at the Enterprise Level · USENIX Security Symposium 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
observation study · 0.6expert evaluation · 0.6empirical study · 0.6case study · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | How Ready is Your Ready? Assessing the Usability of Incident Response Playbook FrameworksabstractIncident response playbooks provide step-by-step guidelines to help security operations personnel quickly respond to specific threat scenarios. Although playbooks are common in the security industry, they have not been empirically evaluated for effectiveness. This paper takes a first step toward measuring playbooks and the frameworks used to design them, using two studies conducted in an enterprise environment. In the first study, twelve security professionals created two playbooks each, using two standard playbook design frameworks; the resulting playbooks were evaluated by experts for accuracy. In the second, we observed five personnel using the created playbooks in no-notice threat exercises within a live security-operations center. We find that playbooks can help simplify and support incident response efforts. However, playbooks designed using the frameworks we examined often lack sufficient detail for real-world use, particularly for more junior technicians. We provide recommendations for improving playbooks, playbook frameworks, and organizational processes surrounding playbook use. Rock Stevens, Daniel Votipka, Josiah Dykstra, Fernando Tomlinson, Erin Quartararo, Colin Ahern, Michelle L. Mazurek |
CHI | 6 |
| 2018 | The Battle for New York: A Case Study of Applied Digital Threat Modeling at the Enterprise Level
Rock Stevens, Daniel Votipka, Elissa M. Redmiles, Colin Ahern, Patrick Sweeney, Michelle L. Mazurek |
USENIX Security Symposium | 4 |