Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Colin Ahern

dblp:224/9433 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Security and privacy · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Network and information security
2 papers
Usable security · 64% Systems and software security · 28% Network security · 8%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Usable security › security operations
incident response
0.612022
How Ready is Your Ready? Assessing the Usability of Incident Response Playbook Frameworks · CHI 2022
Systems and software security › security engineering
threat modeling
0.312018
The Battle for New York: A Case Study of Applied Digital Threat Modeling at the Enterprise Level · USENIX Security Symposium 2018
Usable security › security operations
security operations center
0.212022
How Ready is Your Ready? Assessing the Usability of Incident Response Playbook Frameworks · CHI 2022
Network security › moving target defense
cyber defense
0.112018
The Battle for New York: A Case Study of Applied Digital Threat Modeling at the Enterprise Level · USENIX Security Symposium 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

observation study · 0.6expert evaluation · 0.6empirical study · 0.6case study · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 How Ready is Your Ready? Assessing the Usability of Incident Response Playbook Frameworks
abstract
Incident response playbooks provide step-by-step guidelines to help security operations personnel quickly respond to specific threat scenarios. Although playbooks are common in the security industry, they have not been empirically evaluated for effectiveness. This paper takes a first step toward measuring playbooks and the frameworks used to design them, using two studies conducted in an enterprise environment. In the first study, twelve security professionals created two playbooks each, using two standard playbook design frameworks; the resulting playbooks were evaluated by experts for accuracy. In the second, we observed five personnel using the created playbooks in no-notice threat exercises within a live security-operations center. We find that playbooks can help simplify and support incident response efforts. However, playbooks designed using the frameworks we examined often lack sufficient detail for real-world use, particularly for more junior technicians. We provide recommendations for improving playbooks, playbook frameworks, and organizational processes surrounding playbook use.
Rock Stevens, Daniel Votipka, Josiah Dykstra, Fernando Tomlinson, Erin Quartararo, Colin Ahern, Michelle L. Mazurek
CHI6
2018 The Battle for New York: A Case Study of Applied Digital Threat Modeling at the Enterprise Level
Rock Stevens, Daniel Votipka, Elissa M. Redmiles, Colin Ahern, Patrick Sweeney, Michelle L. Mazurek
USENIX Security Symposium4