Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Dokook Choe
dblp:225/4672
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Deep learning architectures and training · 39% Language models and text generation · 30% Machine translation · 30% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
character-level language modeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attention · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
deep transformer |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attention · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attention · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
auxiliary loss |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attention · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
truncated backpropagation through time · 0.4self-attention · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-AttentionabstractLSTMs and other RNN variants have shown strong performance on character-level language modeling. These models are typically trained using truncated backpropagation through time, and it is common to assume that their success stems from their ability to remember long-term contexts. In this paper, we show that a deep (64-layer) transformer model (Vaswani et al. 2017) with fixed context outperforms RNN variants by a large margin, achieving state of the art on two popular benchmarks: 1.13 bits per character on text8 and 1.06 on enwik8. To get good results at this depth, we show that it is important to add auxiliary losses, both at intermediate network layers and intermediate sequence positions. Rami Al-Rfou, Dokook Choe, Noah Constant, Mandy Guo, Llion Jones |
AAAI | 2 |