Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Dokook Choe

dblp:225/4672 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Deep learning architectures and training · 39% Language models and text generation · 30% Machine translation · 30%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling
character-level language modeling
0.412019
Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attention · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
deep transformer
0.412019
Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attention · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.412019
Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attention · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › loss function design
auxiliary loss
0.112019
Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attention · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

truncated backpropagation through time · 0.4self-attention · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Character-Level Language Modeling with Deeper Self-Attention
abstract
LSTMs and other RNN variants have shown strong performance on character-level language modeling. These models are typically trained using truncated backpropagation through time, and it is common to assume that their success stems from their ability to remember long-term contexts. In this paper, we show that a deep (64-layer) transformer model (Vaswani et al. 2017) with fixed context outperforms RNN variants by a large margin, achieving state of the art on two popular benchmarks: 1.13 bits per character on text8 and 1.06 on enwik8. To get good results at this depth, we show that it is important to add auxiliary losses, both at intermediate network layers and intermediate sequence positions.
Rami Al-Rfou, Dokook Choe, Noah Constant, Mandy Guo, Llion Jones
AAAI2