VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adeel Pervez
dblp:225/4821
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
7as first author
7since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 8 · 7 first-author · 7 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
8 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 29% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% Optimization for machine learning · 17% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
3 papers |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computational science and engineering
scientific machine learning |
2.5 | 3 | 2025 | Mechanistic PDE Networks for Discovery of Governing Equations · ICML 2025 Scalable Mechanistic Neural Networks · ICLR 2025 Mechanistic Neural Networks for Scientific Machine Learning · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
lightweight neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Scalable Mechanistic Neural Networks · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
physics-informed neural network |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mechanistic PDE Networks for Discovery of Governing Equations · ICML 2025 |
Computational science and engineering › partial differential equations
partial differential equation discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Mechanistic PDE Networks for Discovery of Governing Equations · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
object-centric representation learning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Differentiable Mathematical Programming for Object-Centric Representation Learning · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
discrete representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Stability Regularization for Discrete Representation Learning · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
hierarchical VAE |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Spectral Smoothing Unveils Phase Transitions in Hierarchical Variational Autoencoders · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › latent representation learning
latent variable discovery |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Spectral Smoothing Unveils Phase Transitions in Hierarchical Variational Autoencoders · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
posterior collapse |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Spectral Smoothing Unveils Phase Transitions in Hierarchical Variational Autoencoders · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
variational autoencoder |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Spectral Smoothing Unveils Phase Transitions in Hierarchical Variational Autoencoders · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Low Bias Low Variance Gradient Estimates for Boolean Stochastic Networks · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
stochastic neural network |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Low Bias Low Variance Gradient Estimates for Boolean Stochastic Networks · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
variance reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Low Bias Low Variance Gradient Estimates for Boolean Stochastic Networks · ICML 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
GPU parallelization · 3.3differentiable programming · 2.4mechanistic neural network · 1.7linear programming solver · 1.5ODE solver · 1.5multigrid solver · 0.9multi-grid solver · 0.9neural conditional poisson networks · 0.7stability regularization · 0.6spectral analysis · 0.5gaussian smoothing · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Scalable Mechanistic Neural NetworksabstractWe propose Scalable Mechanistic Neural Network (S-MNN), an enhanced neural network framework designed for scientific machine learning applications involving long temporal sequences. By reformulating the original Mechanistic Neural Network (MNN) (Pervez et al., 2024), we reduce the computational time and space complexities from cubic and quadratic with respect to the sequence length, respectively, to linear. This significant improvement enables efficient modeling of long-term dynamics without sacrificing accuracy or interpretability. Extensive experiments demonstrate that S-MNN matches the original MNN in precision while substantially reducing computational resources. Consequently, S-MNN can drop-in replace the original MNN in applications, providing a practical and efficient tool for integrating mechanistic bottlenecks into neural network models of complex dynamical systems. Source code is available at https://github.com/IST-DASLab/ScalableMNN. Jiale Chen 0004, Dingling Yao, Adeel Pervez, Dan Alistarh, Francesco Locatello |
ICLR | 3 |
| 2025 | Mechanistic PDE Networks for Discovery of Governing EquationsabstractWe present Mechanistic PDE Networks -- a model for discovery of governing *partial differential equations* from data.
Mechanistic PDE Networks represent spatiotemporal data as space-time dependent *linear* partial differential equations in neural network hidden representations. The represented PDEs are then solved and decoded for specific tasks. The learned PDE representations naturally express the spatiotemporal dynamics in data in neural network hidden space, enabling increased modeling power. Solving the PDE representations in a compute and memory-efficient way, however, is a significant challenge. We develop a native, GPU-capable, parallel, sparse and differentiable multigrid solver specialized for linear partial differential equations that acts as a module in Mechanistic PDE Networks. Leveraging the PDE solver we propose a discovery architecture that can discovers nonlinear PDEs in complex settings, while being robust to noise. We validate PDE discovery on a number of PDEs including reaction-diffusion and Navier-Stokes equations. Adeel Pervez, Efstratios Gavves, Francesco Locatello |
ICML | 1 |
| 2024 | Mechanistic Neural Networks for Scientific Machine LearningabstractThis paper presents *Mechanistic Neural Networks*, a neural network design for machine learning applications in the sciences. It incorporates a new *Mechanistic Block* in standard architectures to explicitly learn governing differential equations as representations, revealing the underlying dynamics of data and enhancing interpretability and efficiency in data modeling. Central to our approach is a novel *Relaxed Linear Programming Solver* (NeuRLP) inspired by a technique that reduces solving linear ODEs to solving linear programs. This integrates well with neural networks and surpasses the limitations of traditional ODE solvers enabling scalable GPU parallel processing. Overall, Mechanistic Neural Networks demonstrate their versatility for scientific machine learning applications, adeptly managing tasks from equation discovery to dynamic systems modeling. We prove their comprehensive capabilities in analyzing and interpreting complex scientific data across various applications, showing significant performance against specialized state-of-the-art methods. Source code is available at https://github.com/alpz/mech-nn. Adeel Pervez, Francesco Locatello, Stratis Gavves |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Differentiable Mathematical Programming for Object-Centric Representation Learning
Adeel Pervez, Phillip Lippe, Efstratios Gavves |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2023 | Scalable Subset Sampling with Neural Conditional Poisson Networks
Adeel Pervez, Phillip Lippe, Efstratios Gavves |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Stability Regularization for Discrete Representation Learning
Adeel Pervez, Efstratios Gavves |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Spectral Smoothing Unveils Phase Transitions in Hierarchical Variational AutoencodersabstractVariational autoencoders with deep hierarchies of stochastic layers have been known to suffer from the problem of posterior collapse, where the top layers fall back to the prior and become independent of input. We suggest that the hierarchical VAE objective explicitly includes the variance of the function parameterizing the mean and variance of the latent Gaussian distribution which itself is often a high variance function. Building on this we generalize VAE neural networks by incorporating a smoothing parameter motivated by Gaussian analysis to reduce higher frequency components and consequently the variance in parameterizing functions and show that this can help to solve the problem of posterior collapse. We further show that under such smoothing the VAE loss exhibits a phase transition, where the top layer KL divergence sharply drops to zero at a critical value of the smoothing parameter that is similar for the same model across datasets. We validate the phenomenon across model configurations and datasets. Adeel Pervez, Efstratios Gavves |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | Low Bias Low Variance Gradient Estimates for Boolean Stochastic NetworksabstractStochastic neural networks with discrete random variables are an important class of models for their expressiveness and interpretability. Since direct differentiation and backpropagation is not possible, Monte Carlo gradient estimation techniques are a popular alternative. Efficient stochastic gradient estimators, such Straight-Through and Gumbel-Softmax, work well for shallow stochastic models. Their performance, however, suffers with hierarchical, more complex models. We focus on stochastic networks with Boolean latent variables. To analyze such networks, we introduce the framework of harmonic analysis for Boolean functions to derive an analytic formulation for the bias and variance in the Straight-Through estimator. Exploiting these formulations, we propose \emph{FouST}, a low-bias and low-variance gradient estimation algorithm that is just as efficient. Extensive experiments show that FouST performs favorably compared to state-of-the-art biased estimators and is much faster than unbiased ones. Adeel Pervez, Taco Cohen, Efstratios Gavves |
ICML | 1 |