Anhad Mohananey

dblp:225/6840 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
chain-of-thought reasoning
1.012026
Do LLMs Really Need 10+ Thoughts for "Find the Time 1000 Days Later"? Towards Structural Understanding of LLM Overthinking · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
efficient reasoning
1.012026
Do LLMs Really Need 10+ Thoughts for "Find the Time 1000 Days Later"? Towards Structural Understanding of LLM Overthinking · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model reasoning
overthinking
1.012026
Do LLMs Really Need 10+ Thoughts for "Find the Time 1000 Days Later"? Towards Structural Understanding of LLM Overthinking · ACL (1) 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
linguistic generalization
0.412019
Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIs · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model › knowledge probing
linguistic knowledge probing
0.412019
Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIs · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.412019
Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIs · EMNLP/IJCNLP (1) 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

reasoning trace analysis · 1.0analysis methods · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Do LLMs Really Need 10+ Thoughts for "Find the Time 1000 Days Later"? Towards Structural Understanding of LLM Overthinking
abstract
Xinliang Frederick Zhang, Anhad Mohananey, Alexandra Chronopoulou, Pinelopi Papalampidi, Somit Gupta, Tsendsuren Munkhdalai, Lu Wang, Shyam Upadhyay. Proceedings of the 64th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2026.
Xinliang Frederick Zhang, Anhad Mohananey, Alexandra Chronopoulou, Pinelopi Papalampidi, Somit Gupta, Tsendsuren Munkhdalai, Lu Wang 0008, Shyam Upadhyay
ACL (1)2
2025 Fact, Fetch, and Reason: A Unified Evaluation of Retrieval-Augmented Generation
abstract
Satyapriya Krishna, Kalpesh Krishna, Anhad Mohananey, Steven Schwarcz, Adam Stambler, Shyam Upadhyay, Manaal Faruqui. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Satyapriya Krishna, Kalpesh Krishna, Anhad Mohananey, Steven Schwarcz, Adam Stambler, Shyam Upadhyay, Manaal Faruqui
NAACL (Long Papers)3
2020 BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for English
abstract
We introduce The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs (BLiMP),1 a challenge set for evaluating the linguistic knowledge of language models (LMs) on major grammatical phenomena in English. BLiMP consists of 67 individual datasets, each containing 1,000 minimal pairs—that is, pairs of minimally different sentences that contrast in grammatical acceptability and isolate specific phenomenon in syntax, morphology, or semantics. We generate the data according to linguist-crafted grammar templates, and human aggregate agreement with the labels is 96.4%. We evaluate n-gram, LSTM, and Transformer (GPT-2 and Transformer-XL) LMs by observing whether they assign a higher probability to the acceptable sentence in each minimal pair. We find that state-of-the-art models identify morphological contrasts related to agreement reliably, but they struggle with some subtle semantic and syntactic phenomena, such as negative polarity items and extraction islands.
Alex Warstadt, Alicia Parrish, Haokun Liu, Anhad Mohananey, Wei Peng 0013, Sheng-Fu Wang, Samuel R. Bowman
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics4
2020 Erratum: "BLiMP: The Benchmark of Linguistic Minimal Pairs for English"
abstract
We correct wrongly reported results on BLiMP.
Alex Warstadt, Alicia Parrish, Haokun Liu, Anhad Mohananey, Wei Peng 0013, Sheng-Fu Wang, Samuel R. Bowman
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics4
2019 Investigating BERT's Knowledge of Language: Five Analysis Methods with NPIs
abstract
Alex Warstadt, Yu Cao, Ioana Grosu, Wei Peng, Hagen Blix, Yining Nie, Anna Alsop, Shikha Bordia, Haokun Liu, Alicia Parrish, Sheng-Fu Wang, Jason Phang, Anhad Mohananey, Phu Mon Htut, Paloma Jeretic, Samuel R. Bowman. Proceedings of the 2019 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing and the 9th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (EMNLP-IJCNLP). 2019.
Alex Warstadt, Ioana Grosu, Wei Peng 0013, Hagen Blix, Yining Nie, Anna Alsop, Shikha Bordia, Haokun Liu, Alicia Parrish, Sheng-Fu Wang, Jason Phang, Anhad Mohananey, Phu Mon Htut, Paloma Jeretic, Samuel R. Bowman
EMNLP/IJCNLP (1)13