Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sebastian Engelke
dblp:225/7710
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 61% Trustworthy machine learning · 39% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal effect estimation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
causal inference |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
distribution shift |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
instrumental variable |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
invariance |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › graphical models
latent variable graphical model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Extremal graphical modeling with latent variables via convex optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Mathematical optimization › continuous optimization
convex optimization |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Extremal graphical modeling with latent variables via convex optimization · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
husler-reiss model · 1.7convex optimization · 1.7robust optimization · 1.0nonparametric regression · 1.0empirical risk minimization · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Boosted Control Functions: Distribution Generalization and Invariance in Confounded ModelsabstractModern machine learning methods and the availability of large-scale data have significantly advanced our ability to predict target quantities from large sets of covariates. However, these methods often struggle under distributional shifts, particularly in the presence of hidden confounding. While the impact of hidden confounding is well-studied in causal effect estimation, e.g., instrumental variables, its implications for prediction tasks under shifting distributions remain underexplored. This work addresses this gap by introducing a strong notion of invariance that, unlike existing weaker notions, allows for distribution generalization even in the presence of nonlinear, non-identifiable structural functions. Central to this framework is the Boosted Control Function (BCF), a novel, identifiable target of inference that satisfies the proposed strong invariance notion and is provably worst-case optimal under distributional shifts. The theoretical foundation of our work lies in Simultaneous Equation Models for Distribution Generalization (SIMDGs), which bridge machine learning with econometrics by describing data-generating processes under distributional shifts. To put these insights into practice, we propose the ControlTwicing algorithm to estimate the BCF using nonparametric machine-learning techniques and study its generalization performance on synthetic and real-world datasets compared to robust and empirical risk minimization approaches. Nicola Gnecco, Jonas Peters, Sebastian Engelke, Niklas Pfister |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2025 | Extremal graphical modeling with latent variables via convex optimizationabstractExtremal graphical models encode the conditional independence structure of multivariate extremes and provide a powerful tool for quantifying the risk of rare events. Prior work on learning these graphs from data has focused on the setting where all relevant variables are observed. For the popular class of Husler-Reiss models, we propose the eglatent method, a tractable convex program for learning extremal graphical models in the presence of latent variables. Our approach decomposes the Husler-Reiss precision matrix into a sparse component encoding the graphical structure among the observed variables after conditioning on the latent variables, and a low-rank component encoding the effect of a few latent variables on the observed variables. We provide finite-sample guarantees of eglatent and show that it consistently recovers the conditional graph as well as the number of latent variables. We highlight the improved performances of our approach on synthetic and real data. Sebastian Engelke, Armeen Taeb |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |