Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Katja Kaipio
dblp:226/8751
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0001-5978-1217ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 4 · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
4 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology
single-cell analysis |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Agile workflow for interactive analysis of mass cytometry data · Bioinform. 2021 qSNE: quadratic rate t-SNE optimizer with automatic parameter tuning for large datasets · Bioinform. 2020 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › transcriptomics
cancer transcriptomics |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samples · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
deconvolution |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samples · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › single-cell analysis › cytometry data analysis
mass cytometry data analysis |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Agile workflow for interactive analysis of mass cytometry data · Bioinform. 2021 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identifying differentially methylated sites in samples with varying tumor purity · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › epigenomics › DNA methylation
DNA methylation analysis |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Identifying differentially methylated sites in samples with varying tumor purity · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
tumor heterogeneity |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samples · Bioinform. 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation
numerical optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | qSNE: quadratic rate t-SNE optimizer with automatic parameter tuning for large datasets · Bioinform. 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical computation › numerical optimization › second-order methods › newton's method
quasi-newton method |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | qSNE: quadratic rate t-SNE optimizer with automatic parameter tuning for large datasets · Bioinform. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
quasi-newton optimizer · 0.9automatic parameter tuning · 0.9workflow-based analysis · 0.5maximum likelihood · 0.5latent statistical framework · 0.5interactive visualization · 0.5clustering · 0.5statistical model · 0.3maximum likelihood estimation · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Agile workflow for interactive analysis of mass cytometry dataabstractMOTIVATION: Single-cell proteomics technologies, such as mass cytometry, have enabled characterization of cell-to-cell variation and cell populations at a single-cell resolution. These large amounts of data, require dedicated, interactive tools for translating the data into knowledge. RESULTS: We present a comprehensive, interactive method called Cyto to streamline analysis of large-scale cytometry data. Cyto is a workflow-based open-source solution that automates the use of state-of-the-art single-cell analysis methods with interactive visualization. We show the utility of Cyto by applying it to mass cytometry data from peripheral blood and high-grade serous ovarian cancer (HGSOC) samples. Our results show that Cyto is able to reliably capture the immune cell sub-populations from peripheral blood and cellular compositions of unique immune- and cancer cell subpopulations in HGSOC tumor and ascites samples. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: The method is available as a Docker container at https://hub.docker.com/r/anduril/cyto and the user guide and source code are available at https://bitbucket.org/anduril-dev/cyto. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Julia Casado, Oskari Lehtonen, Ville Rantanen, Katja Kaipio, Luca Pasquini, Antti Häkkinen, Eleonora Petrucci, Johanna Hynninen, Sakari Hietanen, Olli Carpén, Mauro Biffoni, Anniina Färkkilä, Sampsa Hautaniemi |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2021 | PRISM: recovering cell-type-specific expression profiles from individual composite RNA-seq samplesabstractMOTIVATION: A major challenge in analyzing cancer patient transcriptomes is that the tumors are inherently heterogeneous and evolving. We analyzed 214 bulk RNA samples of a longitudinal, prospective ovarian cancer cohort and found that the sample composition changes systematically due to chemotherapy and between the anatomical sites, preventing direct comparison of treatment-naive and treated samples. RESULTS: To overcome this, we developed PRISM, a latent statistical framework to simultaneously extract the sample composition and cell-type-specific whole-transcriptome profiles adapted to each individual sample. Our results indicate that the PRISM-derived composition-free transcriptomic profiles and signatures derived from them predict the patient response better than the composite raw bulk data. We validated our findings in independent ovarian cancer and melanoma cohorts, and verified that PRISM accurately estimates the composition and cell-type-specific expression through whole-genome sequencing and RNA in situ hybridization experiments. AVAILABILITYAND IMPLEMENTATION: https://bitbucket.org/anthakki/prism. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Antti Häkkinen, Kaiyang Zhang, Amjad Alkodsi, Noora Andersson, Erdogan Pekcan Erkan, Katja Kaipio, Tarja Lamminen, Naziha Mansuri, Kaisa Huhtinen, Anna Vähärautio, Olli Carpén, Johanna Hynninen, Sakari Hietanen, Rainer Lehtonen, Sampsa Hautaniemi |
Bioinform. | 7 |
| 2020 | qSNE: quadratic rate t-SNE optimizer with automatic parameter tuning for large datasetsabstractMOTIVATION: Non-parametric dimensionality reduction techniques, such as t-distributed stochastic neighbor embedding (t-SNE), are the most frequently used methods in the exploratory analysis of single-cell datasets. Current implementations scale poorly to massive datasets and often require downsampling or interpolative approximations, which can leave less-frequent populations undiscovered and much information unexploited. RESULTS: We implemented a fast t-SNE package, qSNE, which uses a quasi-Newton optimizer, allowing quadratic convergence rate and automatic perplexity (level of detail) optimizer. Our results show that these improvements make qSNE significantly faster than regular t-SNE packages and enables full analysis of large datasets, such as mass cytometry data, without downsampling. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Source code and documentation are openly available at https://bitbucket.org/anthakki/qsne/. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Antti Häkkinen, Juha Koiranen, Julia Casado, Katja Kaipio, Oskari Lehtonen, Eleonora Petrucci, Johanna Hynninen, Sakari Hietanen, Olli Carpén, Luca Pasquini, Mauro Biffoni, Rainer Lehtonen, Sampsa Hautaniemi |
Bioinform. | 4 |
| 2018 | Identifying differentially methylated sites in samples with varying tumor purityabstractMotivation: DNA methylation aberrations are common in many cancer types. A major challenge hindering comparison of patient-derived samples is that they comprise of heterogeneous collection of cancer and microenvironment cells. We present a computational method that allows comparing cancer methylomes in two or more heterogeneous tumor samples featuring differing, unknown fraction of cancer cells. The method is unique in that it allows comparison also in the absence of normal cell control samples and without prior tumor purity estimates, as these are often unavailable or unreliable in clinical samples. Results: We use simulations and next-generation methylome, RNA and whole-genome sequencing data from two cancer types to demonstrate that the method is accurate and outperforms alternatives. The results show that our method adapts well to various cancer types and to a wide range of tumor content, and works robustly without a control or with controls derived from various sources. Availability and implementation: The method is freely available at https://bitbucket.org/anthakki/dmml. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Antti Häkkinen, Amjad Alkodsi, Chiara Facciotto, Kaiyang Zhang, Katja Kaipio, Sirpa Leppä, Olli Carpén, Seija Grénman, Johanna Hynninen, Sakari Hietanen, Rainer Lehtonen, Sampsa Hautaniemi |
Bioinform. | 5 |