Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Richard Wen

dblp:227/1150 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
2since 2021 · last 2026
0009-0004-1770-4829ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Information retrieval · 82% Indexing and storage engines · 18%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Graph algorithms and graph theory · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Storage systems · 100%

Topics — the 7 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › similarity search › nearest neighbor search › approximate nearest neighbor search
graph-based approximate nearest neighbor search
1.012026
Efficiently Constructing Sparse Navigable Graphs · SODA 2026
Information retrieval › similarity search
nearest neighbor search
1.012026
Efficiently Constructing Sparse Navigable Graphs · SODA 2026
Graph algorithms and graph theory › network analysis
navigable graphs
1.012026
Efficiently Constructing Sparse Navigable Graphs · SODA 2026
Information retrieval › information filtering
adaptive filtering
0.812024
Adaptive Quotient Filters · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Information retrieval
filtering
0.812024
Adaptive Quotient Filters · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Indexing and storage engines › membership query › approximate membership query
quotient filter
0.812024
Adaptive Quotient Filters · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024
Storage systems › indexing
b-tree
0.212024
Adaptive Quotient Filters · Proc. ACM Manag. Data 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

quotient filter · 1.5auxiliary structure · 1.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 Efficiently Constructing Sparse Navigable Graphs
abstract
Graph-based nearest neighbor search methods have seen a surge of popularity in recent years, offering state-of-the-art performance across a wide variety of applications. Central to these methods is the task of constructing a sparse navigable search graph for a given dataset endowed with a distance function. Unfortunately, doing so is computationally expensive, so heuristics are universally used in practice.
Alexander Conway 0001, Laxman Dhulipala, Martin Farach-Colton, Rob Johnson 0001, Benjamin Landrum, Christopher Musco, Yarin Shechter, Torsten Suel, Richard Wen
SODA9
2024 Adaptive Quotient Filters
abstract
Filters trade off accuracy for space and occasionally return false positive matches with a bounded error. Numerous systems use filters in fast memory to avoid performing expensive I/Os to slow storage. A fundamental limitation in traditional filters is that they do not change their representation upon seeing a false positive match. Therefore, the maximum false positive rate is only guaranteed for a single query, not for an arbitrary set of queries. We can improve the filter's performance on a stream of queries, especially on a skewed distribution, if we can adapt after encountering false positives. Adaptive filters, such as telescoping quotient filters and adaptive cuckoo filters, update their representation upon detecting a false positive to avoid repeating the same error in the future. Adaptive filters require an auxiliary structure, typically much larger than the main filter and often residing on slow storage, to facilitate adaptation. However, existing adaptive filters are not practical and have not been adopted in real-world systems for two main reasons. First, they offer weak adaptivity guarantees, meaning that fixing a new false positive can cause a previously fixed false positive to come back. Secondly, the sub-optimal design of the auxiliary structure results in adaptivity overheads so substantial that they can actually diminish overall system performance compared to a traditional filter. In this paper, we design and implement the \sysname, the first practical adaptive filter with minimal adaptivity overhead and strong adaptivity guarantees, which means that the performance and false-positive guarantees continue to hold even for adversarial workloads. The \sysname is based on the state-of-the-art quotient filter design and preserves all the critical features of the quotient filter such as cache efficiency and mergeability. Furthermore, we employ a new auxiliary structure design which results in considerably low adaptivity overhead and makes the \sysname practical in real systems. We evaluate the \sysname by using it to filter queries to an on-disk B-tree database and find no negative impact on insert or query performance compared to traditional filters. Against adversarial workloads, the \sysname preserves system performance, whereas traditional filters incur 2× slowdown from adversaries representing as low as 1% of the workload. Finally, we show that on skewed query workloads, the \sysname can reduce the false-positive rate 100× using negligible (1/1000th of a bit per item) space overhead.
Richard Wen, Hunter McCoy, David Tench, Guido Tagliavini, Michael A. Bender, Alexander Conway 0001, Martin Farach-Colton, Rob Johnson 0001, Prashant Pandey 0001
Proc. ACM Manag. Data1