Emmanuel Goutierre

dblp:227/2511 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 75% Algorithms and data structures · 25%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Reinforcement learning · 50% Optimization for machine learning · 50%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.412019
Improving Optimization Bounds Using Machine Learning: Decision Diagrams Meet Deep Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Algorithms and data structures
decision diagrams
0.412019
Improving Optimization Bounds Using Machine Learning: Decision Diagrams Meet Deep Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Mathematical optimization
discrete optimization
0.412019
Improving Optimization Bounds Using Machine Learning: Decision Diagrams Meet Deep Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Mathematical optimization
variable ordering
0.412019
Improving Optimization Bounds Using Machine Learning: Decision Diagrams Meet Deep Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
combinatorial optimization
0.112019
Improving Optimization Bounds Using Machine Learning: Decision Diagrams Meet Deep Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
0.112019
Improving Optimization Bounds Using Machine Learning: Decision Diagrams Meet Deep Reinforcement Learning · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

relaxed and restricted bounds · 0.8deep reinforcement learning · 0.8decision diagrams · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Improving Optimization Bounds Using Machine Learning: Decision Diagrams Meet Deep Reinforcement Learning
abstract
Finding tight bounds on the optimal solution is a critical element of practical solution methods for discrete optimization problems. In the last decade, decision diagrams (DDs) have brought a new perspective on obtaining upper and lower bounds that can be significantly better than classical bounding mechanisms, such as linear relaxations. It is well known that the quality of the bounds achieved through this flexible bounding method is highly reliant on the ordering of variables chosen for building the diagram, and finding an ordering that optimizes standard metrics is an NP-hard problem. In this paper, we propose an innovative and generic approach based on deep reinforcement learning for obtaining an ordering for tightening the bounds obtained with relaxed and restricted DDs. We apply the approach to both the Maximum Independent Set Problem and the Maximum Cut Problem. Experimental results on synthetic instances show that the deep reinforcement learning approach, by achieving tighter objective function bounds, generally outperforms ordering methods commonly used in the literature when the distribution of instances is known. To the best knowledge of the authors, this is the first paper to apply machine learning to directly improve relaxation bounds obtained by general-purpose bounding mechanisms for combinatorial optimization problems.
Quentin Cappart, Emmanuel Goutierre, David Bergman, Louis-Martin Rousseau
AAAI2