Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniel Edmiston

dblp:227/2766 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 72% Information extraction and text analysis · 22% Representation and self-supervised learning · 6%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Automata and formal languages · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › pre-trained language model › knowledge probing
linguistic knowledge probing
0.412020
Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Induction · ICLR 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.412020
Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Induction · ICLR 2020
Automata and formal languages
grammatical inference
0.412020
Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Induction · ICLR 2020
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › sentence pair modeling
natural language inference
0.412019
Dynamic Compositionality in Recursive Neural Networks with Structure-Aware Tag Representations · AAAI 2019
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sentiment analysis
0.412019
Dynamic Compositionality in Recursive Neural Networks with Structure-Aware Tag Representations · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › compositional representation
compositional representation learning
0.112019
Dynamic Compositionality in Recursive Neural Networks with Structure-Aware Tag Representations · AAAI 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

probing · 0.9structure-aware tag representation · 0.4recursive neural network · 0.4Tree-LSTM · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Domain Mismatch Doesn't Always Prevent Cross-lingual Transfer Learning
abstract
Cross-lingual transfer learning without labeled target language data or parallel text has been surprisingly effective in zero-shot cross-lingual classification, question answering, unsupervised machine translation, etc. However, some recent publications have claimed that domain mismatch prevents cross-lingual transfer, and their results show that unsupervised bilingual lexicon induction (UBLI) and unsupervised neural machine translation (UNMT) do not work well when the underlying monolingual corpora come from different domains (e.g., French text from Wikipedia but English text from UN proceedings). In this work, we show how a simple initialization regimen can overcome much of the effect of domain mismatch in cross-lingual transfer. We pre-train word and contextual embeddings on the concatenated domain-mismatched corpora, and use these as initializations for three tasks: MUSE UBLI, UN Parallel UNMT, and the SemEval 2017 cross-lingual word similarity task. In all cases, our results challenge the conclusions of prior work by showing that proper initialization can recover a large portion of the losses incurred by domain mismatch.
Daniel Edmiston, Phillip Keung, Noah A. Smith
LREC1
2020 Are Pre-trained Language Models Aware of Phrases? Simple but Strong Baselines for Grammar Induction
Taeuk Kim, Jihun Choi 0002, Daniel Edmiston, Sang-goo Lee
ICLR3
2019 Dynamic Compositionality in Recursive Neural Networks with Structure-Aware Tag Representations
abstract
Most existing recursive neural network (RvNN) architectures utilize only the structure of parse trees, ignoring syntactic tags which are provided as by-products of parsing. We present a novel RvNN architecture that can provide dynamic compositionality by considering comprehensive syntactic information derived from both the structure and linguistic tags. Specifically, we introduce a structure-aware tag representation constructed by a separate tag-level tree-LSTM. With this, we can control the composition function of the existing wordlevel tree-LSTM by augmenting the representation as a supplementary input to the gate functions of the tree-LSTM. In extensive experiments, we show that models built upon the proposed architecture obtain superior or competitive performance on several sentence-level tasks such as sentiment analysis and natural language inference when compared against previous tree-structured models and other sophisticated neural models.
Taeuk Kim, Jihun Choi 0002, Daniel Edmiston, Sanghwan Bae, Sang-goo Lee
AAAI3