Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
En Tail
dblp:227/7177
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Computer networks · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
Cloud and datacenter computing · 50% Parallel and multicore computing · 50% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Data mining · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Data mining
big data analytics |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | LAS: Logical-Block Affinity Scheduling in Big Data Analytics Systems · INFOCOM 2018 |
Cloud and datacenter computing › cluster resource management and scheduling
cluster resource management |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | LAS: Logical-Block Affinity Scheduling in Big Data Analytics Systems · INFOCOM 2018 |
Parallel and multicore computing › parallel scheduling
locality-aware scheduling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | LAS: Logical-Block Affinity Scheduling in Big Data Analytics Systems · INFOCOM 2018 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | LAS: Logical-Block Affinity Scheduling in Big Data Analytics SystemsabstractParallel computing combined with distributed data storage and management has been widely adopted by most big data analytics systems. Scheduling computing tasks to improve data locality is crucial to the performance of such systems. While existing schedulers target near-data scheduling on top of physical data blocks, these systems face a new scheduling problem where computing tasks process table-based datasets directly and access large physical blocks indirectly through their indices stored in associated small logical blocks. This new problem invalidates the basic assumption made by many existing algorithms on near-data scheduling. In this paper, we propose a Logical-block Affinity Scheduling (LAS) algorithm to coordinate the near-data scheduling of computing tasks and the placement of logical blocks for a desired balance between data-locality and load-balancing to maximize system throughput. The proposed algorithm is implemented and evaluated using a well-known big data benchmark and a practical production system deployed in public clouds. Extensive experimental results illustrate the performance superiority of LAS over three existing scheduling algorithms. Liang Bao, Chase Qishi Wu, Haiyang Qi, Weizhao Chen, Weina Han, En Tail, Jiahao Zhai |
INFOCOM | 8 |