Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Michael Akintunde

dblp:228/0598 · also Michael E. Akintunde · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
4as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-5031-8813ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 4 first-author · 2 since 2021Theory of computation · 2 · 2 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorHuman-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Automated reasoning and model checking · 80% Logic in computer science · 13% Computational complexity · 7%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Multi-agent systems · 100%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program verification · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 10, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Automated reasoning and model checking › model checking
multi-agent system verification
0.412020
Verifying Strategic Abilities of Neural-symbolic Multi-agent Systems · KR 2020
Automated reasoning and model checking › game-based verification
strategic ability verification
0.412020
Verifying Strategic Abilities of Neural-symbolic Multi-agent Systems · KR 2020
Program verification
neural network verification
0.412019
Verification of RNN-Based Neural Agent-Environment Systems · AAAI 2019
Automated reasoning and model checking
temporal logic verification
0.412019
Verification of RNN-Based Neural Agent-Environment Systems · AAAI 2019
Automated reasoning and model checking
reachability
0.312018
Reachability Analysis for Neural Agent-Environment Systems · KR 2018
Logic in computer science › temporal logic › branching-time temporal logic
alternating-time temporal logic
0.112020
Verifying Strategic Abilities of Neural-symbolic Multi-agent Systems · KR 2020
Computational complexity › complexity classes
PSPACE
0.112020
Verifying Strategic Abilities of Neural-symbolic Multi-agent Systems · KR 2020
Logic in computer science
temporal logic
0.112020
Verifying Strategic Abilities of Neural-symbolic Multi-agent Systems · KR 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ReLU recurrent neural networks · 0.8LTL · 0.8mixed-integer linear programming · 0.4mixed integer linear programming · 0.4feedforward neural network · 0.4feed-forward neural network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 More Than Trust: Compliance in Instantaneous Human-robot Interactions
abstract
Compliance is when a human positively responds to a request or a recommendation given by a system. For example, when prompted, providing your thumbprint for an automated biometric scanner at the airport or starting to watch a new TV show on a streaming service ‘we think you will love’. In trust-related research, compliance is frequently used as a behavioural measure of trust. When evaluating the compliance-trust association in experimental settings, typically, the participants agree, when asked, that they complied because they trusted the system. We developed three scenarios in instantaneous settings where compliance with an instruction delivered by a robot would typically be ascribed to trust. However, rather than asking, ‘Did you trust?’, we asked, ‘Why did you comply?’ In a thematic analysis of responses, we discovered robot design characteristics and sources not related to the design that persuade humans to comply with instructions delivered by a robot.
Sachini S. Weerawardhana, Michael Akintunde, Peta Masters, Aaron P. J. Roberts, Genovefa Kefalidou, Gerard Canal, Nicole Lehchevska, Elisabeth Halvorsen, Wei Wei 0045, Luc Moreau 0001
RO-MAN2
2022 Formal verification of neural agents in non-deterministic environments
abstract
Abstract We introduce a model for agent-environment systems where the agents are implemented via feed-forward ReLU neural networks and the environment is non-deterministic. We study the verification problem of such systems against CTL properties. We show that verifying these systems against reachability properties is undecidable. We introduce a bounded fragment of CTL, show its usefulness in identifying shallow bugs in the system, and prove that the verification problem against specifications in bounded CTL is in co NExpTime and PSpace -hard. We introduce sequential and parallel algorithms for MILP-based verification of agent-environment systems, present an implementation, and report the experimental results obtained against a variant of the VerticalCAS use-case and the frozen lake scenario.
Michael Akintunde, Elena Botoeva, Panagiotis Kouvaros, Alessio Lomuscio
Auton. Agents Multi Agent Syst.1
2020 Verifying Strategic Abilities of Neural-symbolic Multi-agent Systems
abstract
We investigate the problem of verifying the strategic properties of multi-agent systems equipped with machine learning-based perception units. We introduce a novel model of agents comprising both a perception system implemented via feed-forward neural networks and an action selection mechanism implemented via traditional control logic. We define the verification problem for these systems against a bounded fragment of alternating-time temporal logic. We translate the verification problem on bounded traces into the feasibility problem of mixed integer linear programs and show the soundness and completeness of the translation. We show that the lower bound of the verification problem is PSPACE and the upper bound is coNEXPTIME. We present a tool implementing the compilation and evaluate the experimental results obtained on a complex scenario of multiple aircraft operating a recently proposed prototype for air-traffic collision avoidance.
Michael Akintunde, Elena Botoeva, Panagiotis Kouvaros, Alessio Lomuscio
KR1
2019 Verification of RNN-Based Neural Agent-Environment Systems
abstract
We introduce agent-environment systems where the agent is stateful and executing a ReLU recurrent neural network. We define and study their verification problem by providing equivalences of recurrent and feed-forward neural networks on bounded execution traces. We give a sound and complete procedure for their verification against properties specified in a simplified version of LTL on bounded executions. We present an implementation and discuss the experimental results obtained.
Michael Akintunde, Andreea Kevorchian, Alessio Lomuscio, Edoardo Pirovano
AAAI1
2018 Reachability Analysis for Neural Agent-Environment Systems
Michael Akintunde, Alessio Lomuscio, Lalit Maganti, Edoardo Pirovano
KR1