Zhuhe Fang

dblp:228/6022 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0001-6554-0014ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 4 · 3 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers
Query processing and optimization · 66% Distributed and cloud data management · 13% Database system architecture and tuning · 13%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Distributed systems · 47% Processor architecture and microarchitecture · 20% Parallel and multicore computing · 20%

Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Query processing and optimization › query scheduling
dynamic scheduling
0.822020
Scheduling Resources to Multiple Pipelines of One Query in a Main Memory Database Cluster · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2020
Parallelizing Multiple Pipelines of One Query in a Main Memory Database Cluster · ICDE 2018
Query processing and optimization
parallel query processing
0.822020
Scheduling Resources to Multiple Pipelines of One Query in a Main Memory Database Cluster · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2020
Parallelizing Multiple Pipelines of One Query in a Main Memory Database Cluster · ICDE 2018
Query processing and optimization
query scheduling
0.822020
Scheduling Resources to Multiple Pipelines of One Query in a Main Memory Database Cluster · IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng. 2020
Parallelizing Multiple Pipelines of One Query in a Main Memory Database Cluster · ICDE 2018
Database system architecture and tuning
hybrid transactional and analytical processing
0.412020
TiDB: A Raft-based HTAP Database · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Distributed systems
consensus
0.412020
TiDB: A Raft-based HTAP Database · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Distributed systems › consensus › leader-based consensus
raft
0.412020
TiDB: A Raft-based HTAP Database · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Processor architecture and microarchitecture
instruction set architecture
0.412019
Interleaved Multi-Vectorizing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019
Parallel and multicore computing › data parallelism
SIMD vectorization
0.412019
Interleaved Multi-Vectorizing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019
Indexing and storage engines
column store
0.112020
TiDB: A Raft-based HTAP Database · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Transaction processing and concurrency control
distributed transaction processing
0.112020
TiDB: A Raft-based HTAP Database · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020
Memory systems
cache
0.112019
Interleaved Multi-Vectorizing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019
Memory systems › cache
cache miss reduction
0.112019
Interleaved Multi-Vectorizing · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

replicated state machine · 0.9multi-raft · 0.9preemption · 0.4list scheduling · 0.4adaptive filling · 0.4vectorization · 0.4prefetching · 0.4list with filling and preemption · 0.3cost-based preemption · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 TiDB: A Raft-based HTAP Database
abstract
Hybrid Transactional and Analytical Processing (HTAP) databases require processing transactional and analytical queries in isolation to remove the interference between them. To achieve this, it is necessary to maintain different replicas of data specified for the two types of queries. However, it is challenging to provide a consistent view for distributed replicas within a storage system, where analytical requests can efficiently read consistent and fresh data from transactional workloads at scale and with high availability. To meet this challenge, we propose extending replicated state machine-based consensus algorithms to provide consistent replicas for HTAP workloads. Based on this novel idea, we present a Raft-based HTAP database: TiDB. In the database, we design a multi-Raft storage system which consists of a row store and a column store. The row store is built based on the Raft algorithm. It is scalable to materialize updates from transactional requests with high availability. In particular, it asynchronously replicates Raft logs to learners which transform row format to column format for tuples, forming a real-time updatable column store. This column store allows analytical queries to efficiently read fresh and consistent data with strong isolation from transactions on the row store. Based on this storage system, we build an SQL engine to process large-scale distributed transactions and expensive analytical queries. The SQL engine optimally accesses row-format and column-format replicas of data. We also include a powerful analysis engine, TiSpark, to help TiDB connect to the Hadoop ecosystem. Comprehensive experiments show that TiDB achieves isolated high performance under CH-benCHmark, a benchmark focusing on HTAP workloads.
Dongxu Huang, Qiu Cui, Zhuhe Fang, Yuxing Zhou, Menglong Huang, Wan Wei, Xuelian Wu, Lingyu Song, Ruoxi Sun 0005, Shuaipeng Yu, Nicholas Cameron 0001, Liquan Pei
Proc. VLDB Endow.4
2020 Scheduling Resources to Multiple Pipelines of One Query in a Main Memory Database Cluster
abstract
To fully utilize the resources of a main memory database cluster, we additionally take the independent parallelism into account to parallelize multiple pipelines of one query. However, scheduling resources to multiple pipelines is an intractable problem. Traditional static approaches to this problem may lead to a serious waste of resources and suboptimal execution order of pipelines, because it is hard to predict the actual data distribution and fluctuating workloads at compile time. In response, we propose a dynamic scheduling algorithm, List with Filling and Preemption (LFPS), based on two novel techniques. (1) Adaptive filling improves resource utilization by issuing more extra pipelines to adaptively fill idle resource “holes” during execution. (2) Rank-based preemption strictly guarantees scheduling the pipelines on the critical path first at run time. Interestingly, the latter facilitates the former filling idle “holes” with best efforts to finish multiple pipelines as soon as possible. We implement LFPS in our prototype database system. Under the workloads of TPC-H, experiments show our work improves the finish time of parallelizable pipelines from one query up to 2.5X than a static approach and 2.1X than a serialized execution.
Zhuhe Fang, Chuliang Weng, Huiqi Hu, Aoying Zhou
IEEE Trans. Knowl. Data Eng.1
2019 Interleaved Multi-Vectorizing
abstract
SIMD is an instruction set in mainstream processors, which provides the data level parallelism to accelerate the performance of applications. However, its advantages diminish when applications suffer from heavy cache misses. To eliminate cache misses in SIMD vectorization, we present interleaved multi-vectorizing (IMV) in this paper. It interleaves multiple execution instances of vectorized code to hide memory access latency with more computation. We also propose residual vectorized states to solve the control flow divergence in vectorization. IMV can make full use of the data parallelism in SIMD and the memory level parallelism through prefetching. It reduces cache misses, branch misses and computation overhead to significantly speed up the performance of pointer-chasing applications, and it can be applied to executing entire query pipelines. As experimental results show, IMV achieves up to 4.23X and 3.17X better performance compared with the pure scalar implementation and the pure SIMD vectorization, respectively.
Zhuhe Fang, Beilei Zheng, Chuliang Weng
Proc. VLDB Endow.1
2018 Parallelizing Multiple Pipelines of One Query in a Main Memory Database Cluster
abstract
To fully use the advanced resources of a main memory database cluster, we take independent parallelism into account to parallelize multiple pipelines of one query. However, scheduling resources to multiple pipelines is an intractable problem. Traditional static approaches to this problem may lead to a serious waste of resources and suboptimal execution order of pipelines, because it is hard to predict the actual data distribution and fluctuating workloads at compile time. In response, we propose a dynamic scheduling algorithm, List with Filling and Preemption (LFPS), based on two techniques. (1) Adaptive filling improves resource utilization by issuing more extra pipelines to adaptively fill idle resource "holes" during execution. (2) Cost-based preemption strictly guarantees scheduling the pipelines on a critical path first at run time. We implement LFPS in our prototype database system. Under the workloads of TPC-H, experiments show our work improves the finish time of parallelizable pipelines from one query up to 2.3X than a static approach and 1.7X than a serialized execution.
Zhuhe Fang, Chuliang Weng, Aoying Zhou
ICDE1