Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Alejandro Rodriguez Cuellar

dblp:228/6071 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers
Data stream processing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Data stream processing
window aggregation
0.822021
Scotty: General and Efficient Open-source Window Aggregation for Stream Processing Systems · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2021
Scotty: Efficient Window Aggregation for Out-of-Order Stream Processing · ICDE 2018
Data stream processing › window aggregation
sliding-window aggregation
0.512021
Scotty: General and Efficient Open-source Window Aggregation for Stream Processing Systems · ACM Trans. Database Syst. 2021
Data stream processing › window aggregation › sliding-window aggregation
out-of-order stream aggregation
0.312018
Scotty: Efficient Window Aggregation for Out-of-Order Stream Processing · ICDE 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

slice-based aggregation · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Scotty: General and Efficient Open-source Window Aggregation for Stream Processing Systems
abstract
Window aggregation is a core operation in data stream processing. Existing aggregation techniques focus on reducing latency, eliminating redundant computations, or minimizing memory usage. However, each technique operates under different assumptions with respect to workload characteristics, such as properties of aggregation functions (e.g., invertible, associative), window types (e.g., sliding, sessions), windowing measures (e.g., time- or count-based), and stream (dis)order. In this article, we present Scotty , an efficient and general open-source operator for sliding-window aggregation in stream processing systems, such as Apache Flink, Apache Beam, Apache Samza, Apache Kafka, Apache Spark, and Apache Storm. One can easily extend Scotty with user-defined aggregation functions and window types. Scotty implements the concept of general stream slicing and derives workload characteristics from aggregation queries to improve performance without sacrificing its general applicability. We provide an in-depth view on the algorithms of the general stream slicing approach. Our experiments show that Scotty outperforms alternative solutions.
Jonas Traub, Philipp M. Grulich, Alejandro Rodriguez Cuellar, Sebastian Breß, Asterios Katsifodimos, Tilmann Rabl, Volker Markl
ACM Trans. Database Syst.3
2019 Efficient Window Aggregation with General Stream Slicing
abstract
Window aggregation is a core operation in data stream processing. Existing aggregation techniques focus on reducing latency, eliminating redundant computations, and minimizing memory usage. However, each technique operates under different assumptions with respect to workload characteristics such as properties of aggregation functions (e.g., invertible, associative), window types (e.g., sliding, sessions), windowing measures (e.g., time- or count-based), and stream (dis)order. Violating the assumptions of a technique can deem it unusable or drastically reduce its performance. In this paper, we present the first general stream slicing technique for window aggregation. General stream slicing automatically adapts to workload characteristics to improve performance without sacrificing its general applicability. As a prerequisite, we identify workload characteristics which affect the performance and applicability of aggregation techniques. Our experiments show that general stream slicing outperforms alternative concepts by up to one order of magnitude.
Jonas Traub, Philipp M. Grulich, Alejandro Rodriguez Cuellar, Sebastian Breß, Asterios Katsifodimos, Tilmann Rabl, Volker Markl
EDBT3
2018 Scotty: Efficient Window Aggregation for Out-of-Order Stream Processing
abstract
Computing aggregates over windows is at the core of virtually every stream processing job. Typical stream processing applications involve overlapping windows and, therefore, cause redundant computations. Several techniques prevent this redundancy by sharing partial aggregates among windows. However, these techniques do not support out-of-order processing and session windows. Out-of-order processing is a key requirement to deal with delayed tuples in case of source failures such as temporary sensor outages. Session windows are widely used to separate different periods of user activity from each other. In this paper, we present Scotty, a high throughput operator for window discretization and aggregation. Scotty splits streams into non-overlapping slices and computes partial aggregates per slice. These partial aggregates are shared among all concurrent queries with arbitrary combinations of tumbling, sliding, and session windows. Scotty introduces the first slicing technique which (1) enables stream slicing for session windows in addition to tumbling and sliding windows and (2) processes out-of-order tuples efficiently. Our technique is generally applicable to a broad group of dataflow systems which use a unified batch and stream processing model. Our experiments show that we achieve a throughput an order of magnitude higher than alternative state-of-the-art solutions.
Jonas Traub, Philipp M. Grulich, Alejandro Rodriguez Cuellar, Sebastian Breß, Asterios Katsifodimos, Tilmann Rabl, Volker Markl
ICDE3