Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Rob Weston

dblp:228/7972 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
3as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 3 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 60% Autonomous driving · 40%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Autonomous driving › perception
environment perception
0.922021
There and Back Again: Learning to Simulate Radar Data for Real-World Applications · ICRA 2021
Probably Unknown: Deep Inverse Sensor Modelling Radar · ICRA 2019
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
odometry
0.612022
Fast-MbyM: Leveraging Translational Invariance of the Fourier Transform for Efficient and Accurate Radar Odometry · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › odometry
radar odometry
0.612022
Fast-MbyM: Leveraging Translational Invariance of the Fourier Transform for Efficient and Accurate Radar Odometry · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
state estimation
0.612022
Fast-MbyM: Leveraging Translational Invariance of the Fourier Transform for Efficient and Accurate Radar Odometry · ICRA 2022
Robotics › Autonomous driving › simulation
radar simulation
0.512021
There and Back Again: Learning to Simulate Radar Data for Real-World Applications · ICRA 2021
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
occupancy grid mapping
0.412019
Probably Unknown: Deep Inverse Sensor Modelling Radar · ICRA 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

neural network masking · 0.6fourier transform · 0.6end-to-end differentiability · 0.6joint optimization · 0.5cycle consistency · 0.5adversarial learning · 0.5self-supervised learning · 0.4heteroscedastic uncertainty · 0.4deep neural network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Fast-MbyM: Leveraging Translational Invariance of the Fourier Transform for Efficient and Accurate Radar Odometry
abstract
Masking by Moving (MByM), provides robust and accurate radar odometry measurements through an exhaustive correlative search across discretised pose candidates. However, this dense search creates a significant computational bottleneck which hinders real-time performance when high-end GPUs are not available. Utilising the translational invariance of the Fourier Transform, in our approach, Fast Masking by Moving (f-MByM), we decouple the search for angle and translation. By maintaining end-to-end differentiability a neural network is used to mask scans and trained by supervising pose prediction directly. Training faster and with less memory, utilising a decoupled search allows f-MbyM to achieve significant run-time performance improvements on a CPU (168 %) and to run in real-time on embedded devices, in stark contrast to MbyM. Throughout, our approach remains accurate and competitive with the best radar odometry variants available in the literature – achieving an end-point drift of 2.01 % in translation and 6.3 deg /km on the Oxford Radar RobotCar Dataset.
Rob Weston, Matthew Gadd, Daniele De Martini, Paul Newman 0001, Ingmar Posner
ICRA1
2021 There and Back Again: Learning to Simulate Radar Data for Real-World Applications
abstract
Simulating realistic radar data has the potential to significantly accelerate the development of data-driven approaches to radar processing. However, it is fraught with difficulty due to the notoriously complex image formation process. Here we propose to learn a radar sensor model capable of synthesising faithful radar observations based on simulated elevation maps. In particular, we adopt an adversarial approach to learning a forward sensor model from unaligned radar examples. In addition, modelling the backward model encourages the output to remain aligned to the world state through a cyclical consistency criterion. The backward model is further constrained to predict elevation maps from real radar data that are grounded by partial measurements obtained from corresponding lidar scans. Both models are trained in a joint optimisation. We demonstrate the efficacy of our approach by evaluating a down-stream segmentation model trained purely on simulated data in a real-world deployment. This achieves performance within four percentage points of the same model trained entirely on real data.
Rob Weston, Oiwi Parker Jones, Ingmar Posner
ICRA1
2019 Probably Unknown: Deep Inverse Sensor Modelling Radar
abstract
Radar presents a promising alternative to lidar and vision in autonomous vehicle applications, able to detect objects at long range under a variety of weather conditions. However, distinguishing between occupied and free space from raw radar power returns is challenging due to complex interactions between sensor noise and occlusion. To counter this we propose to learn an Inverse Sensor Model (ISM) converting a raw radar scan to a grid map of occupancy probabilities using a deep neural network. Our network is selfsupervised using partial occupancy labels generated by lidar, allowing a robot to learn about world occupancy from past experience without human supervision. We evaluate our approach on five hours of data recorded in a dynamic urban environment. By accounting for the scene context of each grid cell our model is able to successfully segment the world into occupied and free space, outperforming standard CFAR filtering approaches. Additionally by incorporating heteroscedastic uncertainty into our model formulation, we are able to quantify the variance in the uncertainty throughout the sensor observation. Through this mechanism we are able to successfully identify regions of space that are likely to be occluded.
Rob Weston, Sarah H. Cen, Paul Newman 0001, Ingmar Posner
ICRA1