Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Chenghao Yang 0001

dblp:229/4179-1 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
10ranked-venue papers
3as first author
8since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-0702-1034ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 10 · 3 first-author · 8 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Reinforcement learning · 30% Language models and text generation · 22% Trustworthy machine learning · 12%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 50% Software testing · 50%
Network and information security
1 paper
Security and privacy of machine learning · 100%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 24 heaviest of 25, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
alignment
1.022025
Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints · ICLR 2024
Tokenized Bandit for LLM Decoding and Alignment · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
bandit
0.912025
Tokenized Bandit for LLM Decoding and Alignment · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › bandit
linear bandits
0.912025
Tokenized Bandit for LLM Decoding and Alignment · ICML 2025
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit
0.912025
Tokenized Bandit for LLM Decoding and Alignment · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › preference optimization
direct preference optimization
0.812024
Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reinforcement learning from human feedback
0.812024
Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints · ICLR 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
amortized inference
0.712023
Efficient Shapley Values Estimation by Amortization for Text Classification · ACL (1) 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.712023
Efficient Shapley Values Estimation by Amortization for Text Classification · ACL (1) 2023
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › shapley value
shapley value estimation
0.712023
Efficient Shapley Values Estimation by Amortization for Text Classification · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
situation understanding
0.712023
Can You Follow Me? Testing Situational Understanding for ChatGPT · EMNLP 2023
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation robustness
0.712023
ReCode: Robustness Evaluation of Code Generation Models · ACL (1) 2023
Software testing
robustness analysis
0.712023
ReCode: Robustness Evaluation of Code Generation Models · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › event analysis › event understanding
event sequence modeling
0.612022
Transformer Embeddings of Irregularly Spaced Events and Their Participants · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning
0.612022
Improving Stability of Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models via Component-Wise Gradient Norm Clipping · EMNLP 2022
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer
0.612022
Transformer Embeddings of Irregularly Spaced Events and Their Participants · ICLR 2022
Security and privacy of machine learning
adversarial attack
0.412020
Word-level Textual Adversarial Attacking as Combinatorial Optimization · ACL 2020
Security and privacy of machine learning › adversarial attack
textual adversarial attack
0.412020
Word-level Textual Adversarial Attacking as Combinatorial Optimization · ACL 2020
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.412020
Word-level Textual Adversarial Attacking as Combinatorial Optimization · ACL 2020
Mathematical optimization › metaheuristic optimization › swarm intelligence
particle swarm optimization
0.412020
Word-level Textual Adversarial Attacking as Combinatorial Optimization · ACL 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › semantic representation
compositional semantics
0.412019
Modeling Semantic Compositionality with Sememe Knowledge · ACL (1) 2019
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
decoding
0.312025
Tokenized Bandit for LLM Decoding and Alignment · ICML 2025
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
code generation
0.212023
ReCode: Robustness Evaluation of Code Generation Models · ACL (1) 2023
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
dialogue modeling
0.212023
Can You Follow Me? Testing Situational Understanding for ChatGPT · EMNLP 2023
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
pre-trained language model
0.212022
Improving Stability of Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models via Component-Wise Gradient Norm Clipping · EMNLP 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

perturbation-based evaluation · 1.3metamorphic testing · 1.3regret analysis · 0.9greedy decoding · 0.9diminishing distance assumption · 0.9sememe-based word substitution · 0.9particle swarm optimization · 0.9karush-kuhn-tucker conditions · 0.8f-divergence · 0.8synthetic environment testing · 0.7amortized model · 0.7gradient norm clipping · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Tokenized Bandit for LLM Decoding and Alignment
abstract
We introduce the tokenized linear bandit (TLB) and multi-armed bandit (TMAB), variants of linear and stochastic multi-armed bandit problems inspired by LLM decoding and alignment. In these problems, at each round $t \in [T]$, a user submits a query (context), and the decision maker (DM) sequentially selects a token irrevocably from a token set. Once the sequence is complete, the DM observes a random utility from the user, whose expectation is presented by a sequence function mapping the chosen token sequence to a nonnegative real value that depends on the query. In both problems, we first show that learning is impossible without any structure on the sequence function. We introduce a natural assumption, diminishing distance with more commons (DDMC), and propose algorithms with regret $\tilde{O}(L\sqrt{T})$ and $\tilde{O}(L\sqrt{T^{2/3}})$ for TLB and TMAB, respectively. As a side product, we obtain an (almost) optimality of the greedy decoding for LLM decoding algorithm under DDMC, which justifies the unresaonable effectiveness of greedy decoding in several tasks. This also has an immediate application to decoding-time LLM alignment, when the misaligned utility can be represented as the frozen LLM's utility and a linearly realizable latent function. We finally validate our algorithm's performance empirically as well as verify our assumptions using synthetic and real-world datasets.
Suho Shin 0001, Chenghao Yang 0001, Mohammad Hajiaghayi
ICML2
2024 Beyond Reverse KL: Generalizing Direct Preference Optimization with Diverse Divergence Constraints
abstract
The increasing capabilities of large language models (LLMs) raise opportunities for artificial general intelligence but concurrently amplify safety concerns, such as potential misuse of AI systems, necessitating effective AI alignment. Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a promising pathway towards AI alignment but brings forth challenges due to its complexity and dependence on a separate reward model. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has been proposed as an alternative; and it remains equivalent to RLHF under the reverse KL regularization constraint. This paper presents $f$-DPO, a generalized approach to DPO by incorporating diverse divergence constraints. We show that under certain $f$-divergences, including Jensen-Shannon divergence, forward KL divergences and $\alpha$-divergences, the complex relationship between the reward and optimal policy can also be simplified by addressing the Karush–Kuhn–Tucker conditions. This eliminates the need for estimating the normalizing constant in the Bradley-Terry model and enables a tractable mapping between the reward function and the optimal policy. Our approach optimizes LLMs to align with human preferences in a more efficient and supervised manner under a broad set of divergence constraints. Empirically, adopting these divergences ensures a balance between alignment performance and generation diversity. Importantly, our $f$-DPO outperforms PPO-based methods in divergence efficiency, and divergence constraints directly influence expected calibration error (ECE).
Chaoqi Wang, Yibo Jiang, Chenghao Yang 0001, Yuxin Chen 0001
ICLR3
2023 ReCode: Robustness Evaluation of Code Generation Models
abstract
Shiqi Wang, Zheng Li, Haifeng Qian, Chenghao Yang, Zijian Wang, Mingyue Shang, Varun Kumar, Samson Tan, Baishakhi Ray, Parminder Bhatia, Ramesh Nallapati, Murali Krishna Ramanathan, Dan Roth, Bing Xiang. Proceedings of the 61st Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2023.
Shiqi Wang 0002, Haifeng Qian, Chenghao Yang 0001, Zijian Wang 0002, Mingyue Shang, Samson Tan, Baishakhi Ray, Parminder Bhatia, Ramesh Nallapati, Murali Krishna Ramanathan, Dan Roth 0001, Bing Xiang
ACL (1)4
2023 Efficient Shapley Values Estimation by Amortization for Text Classification
abstract
Despite the popularity of Shapley Values in explaining neural text classification models, computing them is prohibitive for large pretrained models due to a large number of model evaluations.In practice, Shapley Values are often estimated with a small number of stochastic model evaluations.However, we show that the estimated Shapley Values are sensitive to random seed choices -the top-ranked features often have little overlap across different seeds, especially on examples with longer input texts.This can only be mitigated by aggregating thousands of model evaluations, which on the other hand, induces substantial computational overheads.To mitigate the trade-off between stability and efficiency, we develop an amortized model that directly predicts each input feature's Shapley Value without additional model evaluations.It is trained on a set of examples whose Shapley Values are estimated from a large number of model evaluations to ensure stability.Experimental results on two text classification datasets demonstrate that our amortized model estimates Shapley Values accurately with up to 60 times speedup compared to traditional methods.Furthermore, the estimated values are stable as the inference is deterministic.We release our code at https://github.com/yangalan123/ Amortized-Interpretability.
Chenghao Yang 0001, Fan Yin, He He 0001, Kai-Wei Chang 0001, Xiaofei Ma 0001, Bing Xiang
ACL (1)1
2023 Can You Follow Me? Testing Situational Understanding for ChatGPT
abstract
Understanding sentence meanings and updating information states appropriately across time-what we call "situational understanding" (SU)-is a critical ability for human-like AI agents.SU is essential in particular for chat models, such as ChatGPT, to enable consistent, coherent, and effective dialogue between humans and AI.Previous works have identified certain SU limitations in non-chatbot Large Language models (LLMs), but the extent and causes of these limitations are not well understood, and capabilities of current chat-based models in this domain have not been explored.In this work we tackle these questions, proposing a novel synthetic environment for SU testing which allows us to do controlled and systematic testing of SU in chat-oriented models, through assessment of models' ability to track and enumerate environment states.Our environment also allows for close analysis of dynamics of model performance, to better understand underlying causes for performance patterns.We apply our test to ChatGPT, the stateof-the-art chatbot, and find that despite the fundamental simplicity of the task, the model's performance reflects an inability to retain correct environment states across time.Our follow-up analyses suggest that performance degradation is largely because ChatGPT has non-persistent in-context memory (although it can access the full dialogue history) and it is susceptible to hallucinated updates-including updates that artificially inflate accuracies.Our findings suggest overall that ChatGPT is not currently equipped for robust tracking of situation states, and that trust in the impressive dialogue performance of ChatGPT comes with risks.We release the codebase for reproducing our test environment, as well as all prompts and API responses from ChatGPT, at https://github.com/ yangalan123/SituationalTesting.
Chenghao Yang 0001, Allyson Ettinger
EMNLP1
2022 Improving Stability of Fine-Tuning Pretrained Language Models via Component-Wise Gradient Norm Clipping
abstract
Fine-tuning over large pretrained language models (PLMs) has established many stateof-the-art results.Despite its superior performance, such fine-tuning can be unstable, resulting in significant variance in performance and potential risks for practical applications.Previous works have attributed such instability to the catastrophic forgetting problem in the top layers of PLMs, which indicates iteratively fine-tuning layers in top-down manner is a promising solution.In this paper, we first point out that this method does not always work out due to different convergence speeds of different layers/modules.Inspired by this observation, we propose a simple componentwise gradient norm clipping method to adjust the convergence speed for different components.Experiment results demonstrate that our method achieves consistent improvements in terms of generalization performance, convergence speed and training stability.The codebase can be found at https://github.com/ yangalan123/FineTuningStability.
Chenghao Yang 0001, Xuezhe Ma
EMNLP1
2022 Transformer Embeddings of Irregularly Spaced Events and Their Participants
Hongyuan Mei, Chenghao Yang 0001, Jason Eisner
ICLR2
2021 Narrative Question Answering with Cutting-Edge Open-Domain QA Techniques: A Comprehensive Study
abstract
Abstract Recent advancements in open-domain question answering (ODQA), that is, finding answers from large open-domain corpus like Wikipedia, have led to human-level performance on many datasets. However, progress in QA over book stories (Book QA) lags despite its similar task formulation to ODQA. This work provides a comprehensive and quantitative analysis about the difficulty of Book QA: (1) We benchmark the research on the NarrativeQA dataset with extensive experiments with cutting-edge ODQA techniques. This quantifies the challenges Book QA poses, as well as advances the published state-of-the-art with a ∼7% absolute improvement on ROUGE-L. (2) We further analyze the detailed challenges in Book QA through human studies.1 Our findings indicate that the event-centric questions dominate this task, which exemplifies the inability of existing QA models to handle event-oriented scenarios.
Xiangyang Mou, Chenghao Yang 0001, Mo Yu, Bingsheng Yao, Saloni Potdar, Hui Su
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics2
2020 Word-level Textual Adversarial Attacking as Combinatorial Optimization
abstract
Adversarial attacks are carried out to reveal the vulnerability of deep neural networks.Textual adversarial attacking is challenging because text is discrete and a small perturbation can bring significant change to the original input.Word-level attacking, which can be regarded as a combinatorial optimization problem, is a well-studied class of textual attack methods.However, existing word-level attack models are far from perfect, largely because unsuitable search space reduction methods and inefficient optimization algorithms are employed.In this paper, we propose a novel attack model, which incorporates the sememebased word substitution method and particle swarm optimization-based search algorithm to solve the two problems separately.We conduct exhaustive experiments to evaluate our attack model by attacking BiLSTM and BERT on three benchmark datasets.Experimental results demonstrate that our model consistently achieves much higher attack success rates and crafts more high-quality adversarial examples as compared to baseline methods.Also, further experiments show our model has higher transferability and can bring more robustness enhancement to victim models by adversarial training.
Yuan Zang, Fanchao Qi, Chenghao Yang 0001, Zhiyuan Liu 0001, Meng Zhang 0019, Qun Liu 0001, Maosong Sun 0001
ACL3
2019 Modeling Semantic Compositionality with Sememe Knowledge
abstract
Semantic compositionality (SC) refers to the phenomenon that the meaning of a complex linguistic unit can be composed of the meanings of its constituents.Most related works focus on using complicated compositionality functions to model SC while few works consider external knowledge in models.In this paper, we verify the effectiveness of sememes, the minimum semantic units of human languages, in modeling SC by a confirmatory experiment.Furthermore, we make the first attempt to incorporate sememe knowledge into SC models, and employ the sememeincorporated models in learning representations of multiword expressions, a typical task of SC.In experiments, we implement our models by incorporating knowledge from a famous sememe knowledge base HowNet and perform both intrinsic and extrinsic evaluations.Experimental results show that our models achieve significant performance boost as compared to the baseline methods without considering sememe knowledge.We further conduct quantitative analysis and case studies to demonstrate the effectiveness of applying sememe knowledge in modeling SC.All the code and data of this paper can be obtained on https: //github.com/thunlp/Sememe-SC.
Fanchao Qi, Junjie Huang 0003, Chenghao Yang 0001, Zhiyuan Liu 0001, Xiao Chen 0012, Qun Liu 0001, Maosong Sun 0001
ACL (1)3