Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jiabei Chen

dblp:229/9396 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Language models and text generation · 60% Question answering and dialogue systems · 20% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 20%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › language modeling › long-context language modeling › context utilization
long-context modeling
1.012026
RetroLM: Retrieval-Augmented KVs for Long-Context Processing · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
retrieval-augmented generation
1.012026
RetroLM: Retrieval-Augmented KVs for Long-Context Processing · AAAI 2026
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation
1.012026
RetroLM: Retrieval-Augmented KVs for Long-Context Processing · AAAI 2026
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
knowledge base question answering
0.812024
Generate-on-Graph: Treat LLM as both Agent and KG for Incomplete Knowledge Graph Question Answering · EMNLP 2024
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › knowledge graph
knowledge graph completion
0.812024
Generate-on-Graph: Treat LLM as both Agent and KG for Incomplete Knowledge Graph Question Answering · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
LLM agents
0.212024
Generate-on-Graph: Treat LLM as both Agent and KG for Incomplete Knowledge Graph Question Answering · EMNLP 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

unsupervised post-training · 2.0KV cache retrieval · 2.0training-free reasoning · 0.8thinking-searching-generating framework · 0.8
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 RetroLM: Retrieval-Augmented KVs for Long-Context Processing
abstract
Long-context processing remains a significant challenge for large language models (LLMs). Retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) has recently emerged as a promising approach, enabling LLMs to selectively access relevant information from extended contexts to improve efficiency. However, existing RAG approaches often lag behind other efficient long-context processing methods primarily due to inherent limitations on inaccurate retrieval and fragmented contexts. To address these limitations, we propose RetroLM, a novel RAG framework designed for effective long-context processing. Unlike traditional approaches, RetroLM introduces KV-level retrieval augmentation, which partitions the LLM's KV cache into contiguous pages and performs encoding and decoding operations based on the retrieved KV pages. Built upon this framework, we further develop a specialized retriever for precise retrieval of critical pages and conduct unsupervised post-training to optimize the model’s ability to leverage retrieved information. Compared with traditional RAG, the new approach enhances robustness to retrieval inaccuracy, facilitates effective utilization of fragmented contexts, and saves the cost from repeated context-encoding operations. We conduct extensive evaluations across several popular benchmarks, including LongBench, InfiniteBench, and RULER. RetroLM consistently outperforms existing long-LLMs and RAG-based methods, especially in tasks requiring deep reasoning or extreme context lengths.
Zheng Liu 0011, Shitao Xiao, Jiabei Chen, Hongjin Qian, Peitian Zhang, Shanshan Jiang 0001, Bin Dong 0003, Jun Zhao 0001, Kang Liu 0001
AAAI4
2025 LLaSA: Large Language and Structured Data Assistant
abstract
Yao Xu, Shizhu He, Jiabei Chen, ZengXiangrong ZengXiangrong, Bingning Wang, Guang Liu, Jun Zhao, Kang Liu. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025.
Shizhu He, Jiabei Chen, ZengXiangrong ZengXiangrong, Bingning Wang, Jun Zhao 0001, Kang Liu 0001
NAACL (Long Papers)3
2024 Generate-on-Graph: Treat LLM as both Agent and KG for Incomplete Knowledge Graph Question Answering
abstract
To address the issues of insufficient knowledge and hallucination in Large Language Models (LLMs), numerous studies have explored integrating LLMs with Knowledge Graphs (KGs).However, these methods are typically evaluated on conventional Knowledge Graph Question Answering (KGQA) with complete KGs, where all factual triples required for each question are entirely covered by the given KG.In such cases, LLMs primarily act as an agent to find answer entities within the KG, rather than effectively integrating the internal knowledge of LLMs and external knowledge sources such as KGs.In fact, KGs are often incomplete to cover all the knowledge required to answer questions.To simulate these real-world scenarios and evaluate the ability of LLMs to integrate internal and external knowledge, we propose leveraging LLMs for QA under Incomplete Knowledge Graph (IKGQA), where the provided KG lacks some of the factual triples for each question, and construct corresponding datasets.To handle IKGQA, we propose a training-free method called Generate-on-Graph (GoG), which can generate new factual triples while exploring KGs.Specifically, GoG performs reasoning through a Thinking-Searching-Generating framework, which treats LLM as both Agent and KG in IKGQA.Experimental results on two datasets demonstrate that our GoG outperforms all previous methods.
Shizhu He, Jiabei Chen, Zihao Wang 0001, Yangqiu Song, Hanghang Tong, Jun Zhao 0001, Kang Liu 0001
EMNLP3