Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Matthieu Devin
dblp:23/2143
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 54% Representation and self-supervised learning · 20% Deep learning architectures and training · 20% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Distributed systems · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 8, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
large-scale learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning · OSDI 2016 |
Distributed systems
large-scale machine learning systems |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning · OSDI 2016 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Large Scale Distributed Deep Networks · NIPS 2012 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
unsupervised representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning · ICML 2012 |
Distributed systems
distributed machine learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2012 | Large Scale Distributed Deep Networks · NIPS 2012 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
asynchronous SGD · 0.3Sandblaster L-BFGS · 0.3Downpour SGD · 0.3data flow graphs · 0.2data flow graph · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | TensorFlow: A System for Large-Scale Machine Learning
Martín Abadi, Paul Barham 0001, Jianmin Chen, Andy Davis, Jeffrey Dean, Matthieu Devin, Sanjay Ghemawat, Geoffrey Irving, Michael Isard, Manjunath Kudlur, Josh Levenberg, Rajat Monga, Sherry Moore, Derek Gordon Murray, Benoit Steiner, Paul A. Tucker, Vijay Vasudevan, Pete Warden, Martin Wicke, Xiaoqiang Zheng |
OSDI | 7 |
| 2013 | Multilingual acoustic models using distributed deep neural networksabstractToday's speech recognition technology is mature enough to be useful for many practical applications. In this context, it is of paramount importance to train accurate acoustic models for many languages within given resource constraints such as data, processing power, and time. Multilingual training has the potential to solve the data issue and close the performance gap between resource-rich and resource-scarce languages. Neural networks lend themselves naturally to parameter sharing across languages, and distributed implementations have made it feasible to train large networks. In this paper, we present experimental results for cross- and multi-lingual network training of eleven Romance languages on 10k hours of data in total. The average relative gains over the monolingual baselines are 4%/2% (data-scarce/data-rich languages) for cross- and 7%/2% for multi-lingual training. However, the additional gain from jointly training the languages on all data comes at an increased training time of roughly four weeks, compared to two weeks (monolingual) and one week (crosslingual). Georg Heigold, Vincent Vanhoucke, Andrew W. Senior, Patrick Nguyen, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Matthieu Devin, Jeffrey Dean |
ICASSP | 6 |
| 2013 | Multiframe deep neural networks for acoustic modelingabstractDeep neural networks have been shown to perform very well as acoustic models for automatic speech recognition. Compared to Gaussian mixtures however, they tend to be very expensive computationally, making them challenging to use in real-time applications. One key advantage of such neural networks is their ability to learn from very long observation windows going up to 400 ms. Given this very long temporal context, it is tempting to wonder whether one can run neural networks at a lower frame rate than the typical 10 ms, and whether there might be computational benefits to doing so. This paper describes a method of tying the neural network parameters over time which achieves comparable performance to the typical frame-synchronous model, while achieving up to a 4X reduction in the computational cost of the neural network activations. Vincent Vanhoucke, Matthieu Devin, Georg Heigold |
ICASSP | 2 |
| 2012 | Building high-level features using large scale unsupervised learning
Quoc V. Le, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Rajat Monga, Matthieu Devin, Gregory S. Corrado, Kai Chen 0010, Jeffrey Dean, Andrew Y. Ng |
ICML | 4 |
| 2012 | Large Scale Distributed Deep NetworksabstractRecent work in unsupervised feature learning and deep learning has shown that being able to train large models can dramatically improve performance. In this paper, we consider the problem of training a deep network with billions of parameters using tens of thousands of CPU cores. We have developed a software framework called DistBelief that can utilize computing clusters with thousands of machines to train large models. Within this framework, we have developed two algorithms for large-scale distributed training: (i) Downpour SGD, an asynchronous stochastic gradient descent procedure supporting a large number of model replicas, and (ii) Sandblaster, a framework that supports for a variety of distributed batch optimization procedures, including a distributed implementation of L-BFGS. Downpour SGD and Sandblaster L-BFGS both increase the scale and speed of deep network training. We have successfully used our system to train a deep network 100x larger than previously reported in the literature, and achieves state-of-the-art performance on ImageNet, a visual object recognition task with 16 million images and 21k categories. We show that these same techniques dramatically accelerate the training of a more modestly sized deep network for a commercial speech recognition service. Although we focus on and report performance of these methods as applied to training large neural networks, the underlying algorithms are applicable to any gradient-based machine learning algorithm. Jeffrey Dean, Gregory S. Corrado, Rajat Monga, Kai Chen 0010, Matthieu Devin, Quoc V. Le, Mark Z. Mao, Marc'Aurelio Ranzato, Andrew W. Senior, Paul A. Tucker, Andrew Y. Ng |
NIPS | 5 |