VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ori Sasson
dblp:23/6373
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2005
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Algorithms and data structures · 64% Computational complexity · 36% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › structural bioinformatics
protein structure classification |
0.1 | 1 | 2005 | Predicting fold novelty based on ProtoNet hierarchical classification · Bioinform. 2005 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Property testing of data dimensionality · SODA 2003 |
Computational complexity
property testing |
0.0 | 1 | 2003 | Property testing of data dimensionality · SODA 2003 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein function prediction
protein classification |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | The metric space of proteins-comparative study of clustering algorithms · ISMB 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › protein sequence analysis › protein family analysis
protein family clustering |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | The metric space of proteins-comparative study of clustering algorithms · ISMB 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
structural genomics |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Predicting fold novelty based on ProtoNet hierarchical classification · Bioinform. 2005 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural genomics
target selection |
0.0 | 1 | 2005 | Predicting fold novelty based on ProtoNet hierarchical classification · Bioinform. 2005 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures
hashing |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Non-Expansive Hashing · STOC 1996 |
Algorithms and data structures › similarity search
nearest neighbor search |
0.0 | 1 | 1996 | Non-Expansive Hashing · STOC 1996 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
sequence analysis |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | The metric space of proteins-comparative study of clustering algorithms · ISMB 2002 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
sequence similarity |
0.0 | 1 | 2002 | The metric space of proteins-comparative study of clustering algorithms · ISMB 2002 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
protonet hierarchical classification · 0.1PSI-BLAST · 0.1hierarchical clustering · 0.0BLAST · 0.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2005 | Predicting fold novelty based on ProtoNet hierarchical classificationabstractAbstract Motivation: Structural genomics projects aim to solve a large number of protein structures with the ultimate objective of representing the entire protein space. The computational challenge is to identify and prioritize a small set of proteins with new, currently unknown, superfamilies or folds. Results: We develop a method that assigns each protein a likelihood of it belonging to a new, yet undetermined, structural superfamily. The method relies on a variant of ProtoNet, an automatic hierarchical classification scheme of all protein sequences from SwissProt. Our results show that proteins that are remote from solved structures in the ProtoNet hierarchy are more likely to belong to new superfamilies. The results are validated against SCOP releases from recent years that account for about half of the solved structures known to date. We show that our new method and the representation of ProtoNet are superior in detecting new targets, compared to our previous method using ProtoMap classification. Furthermore, our method outperforms PSI-BLAST search in detecting potential new superfamilies. Availability: An interactive tool implementing this method, named ProTarget, is available at http://www.protarget.cs.huji.ac.il. It can be used interactively to retrieve a list of candidate proteins for Structural genomics projects. Supplementary material is available at http://www.protarget.cs.huji.ac.il/supplement Contact: [email protected] Ilona Kifer, Ori Sasson, Michal Linial |
Bioinform. | 2 |
| 2003 | Property testing of data dimensionality
Robert Krauthgamer, Ori Sasson |
SODA | 2 |
| 2002 | The metric space of proteins-comparative study of clustering algorithmsabstractAbstract Motivation: A large fraction of biological research concentrates on individual proteins and on small families of proteins. One of the current major challenges in bioinformatics is to extend our knowledge to very large sets of proteins. Several major projects have tackled this problem. Such undertakings usually start with a process that clusters all known proteins or large subsets of this space. Some work in this area is carried out automatically, while other attempts incorporate expert advice and annotation. Results: We propose a novel technique that automatically clusters protein sequences. We consider all proteins in SWISSPROT, and carry out an all-against-all BLAST similarity test among them. With this similarity measure in hand we proceed to perform a continuous bottom-up clustering process by applying alternative rules for merging clusters. The outcome of this clustering process is a classification of the input proteins into a hierarchy of clusters of varying degrees of granularity. Here we compare the clusters that result from alternative merging rules, and validate the results against InterPro. Our preliminary results show that clusters that are consistent with several rather than a single merging rule tend to comply with InterPro annotation. This is an affirmation of the view that the protein space consists of families that differ markedly in their evolutionary conservation. Availability: The outcome of these investigations can be viewed in an interactive Web site at http://www.protonet.cs.huji.ac.il Supplementary information: Biological examples for comparing the performance of the different algorithms used for classification are presented in http://www.protonet.cs.huji.ac.il/examples.html Contact: [email protected] Keywords: protein families; protein classification; sequence alignment; clustering. Ori Sasson, Nathan Linial, Michal Linial |
ISMB | 1 |
| 1996 | Non-Expansive HashingabstractIn a non-e~pansive hashing scheme, similar inputs are stored in memory locations which are close.We develop a non-expansive hashing scheme wherein any set of size O (R1-C) from a large universe may be stored in a memory of size R (any e > 0, and R > Ro(c)), and where ret rieval takes O(1) operations.We explain how to use non-expansive hashing schemes for efficient storage and retrieval of noisy data.A dynamic version of this hashing scheme is presented as well. Nathan Linial, Ori Sasson |
STOC | 2 |