Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Chonghai Wang
dblp:23/8493
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Query processing and optimization · 77% Data models and query languages · 12% Database theory · 12% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Query processing and optimization
top-k query processing |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | On Pruning for Top-K Ranking in Uncertain Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011 |
Query processing and optimization › top-k query processing
uncertain database top-k |
0.1 | 1 | 2011 | On Pruning for Top-K Ranking in Uncertain Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011 |
Database theory › probabilistic databases
possible world semantics |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | On Pruning for Top-K Ranking in Uncertain Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011 |
Data models and query languages › uncertain data
probabilistic data |
0.0 | 1 | 2011 | On Pruning for Top-K Ranking in Uncertain Databases · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2011 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
possible world semantics · 0.1parameterized ranking functions · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2011 | On Pruning for Top-K Ranking in Uncertain DatabasesabstractTop-k ranking for an uncertain database is to rank tuples in it so that the best k of them can be determined. The problem has been formalized under the unified approach based on parameterized ranking functions (PRFs) and the possible world semantics. Given a PRF, one can always compute the ranking function values of all the tuples to determine the top-k tuples, which is a formidable task for large databases. In this paper, we present a general approach to pruning for the framework based on PRFs. We show a mathematical manipulation of possible worlds which reveals key insights in the part of computation that may be pruned and how to achieve it in a systematic fashion. This leads to concrete pruning methods for a wide range of ranking functions. We show experimentally the effectiveness of our approach. Chonghai Wang, Li-Yan Yuan, Jia-Huai You, Osmar R. Zaïane, Jian Pei 0001 |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 1 |