Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Soochan Lee
dblp:230/1398
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
4as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 first-author · 4 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
7 papers |
Learning paradigms · 32% Reinforcement learning · 14% Deep learning architectures and training · 11% |
Topics — the 19 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
2.7 | 4 | 2025 | When Meta-Learning Meets Online and Continual Learning: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 Learning to Continually Learn with the Bayesian Principle · ICML 2024 Recasting Continual Learning as Sequence Modeling · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
meta-learning |
1.1 | 2 | 2025 | When Meta-Learning Meets Online and Continual Learning: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 Learning to Continually Learn with the Bayesian Principle · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
meta-reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distilling Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for In-Context Model-Based Planning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Distilling Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for In-Context Model-Based Planning · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
online learning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Meta-Learning Meets Online and Continual Learning: A Survey · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › recursive bayesian estimation
bayesian online learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Continually Learn with the Bayesian Principle · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
catastrophic forgetting |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Learning to Continually Learn with the Bayesian Principle · ICML 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
sequence modeling |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Recasting Continual Learning as Sequence Modeling · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Recasting Continual Learning as Sequence Modeling · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms › continual learning
task-free continual learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A Neural Dirichlet Process Mixture Model for Task-Free Continual Learning · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
conditional generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Harmonizing Maximum Likelihood with GANs for Multimodal Conditional Generation · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Harmonizing Maximum Likelihood with GANs for Multimodal Conditional Generation · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › conditional generative model
multimodal conditional generation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Harmonizing Maximum Likelihood with GANs for Multimodal Conditional Generation · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Computer vision › Video understanding and tracking › object tracking
occlusion handling |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Improving Occlusion and Hard Negative Handling for Single-Stage Pedestrian Detectors · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection › object detection
one-stage object detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Improving Occlusion and Hard Negative Handling for Single-Stage Pedestrian Detectors · CVPR 2018 |
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
pedestrian detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Improving Occlusion and Hard Negative Handling for Single-Stage Pedestrian Detectors · CVPR 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian nonparametric model
dirichlet process mixture model |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | A Neural Dirichlet Process Mixture Model for Task-Free Continual Learning · ICLR 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › parameter estimation
maximum likelihood estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Harmonizing Maximum Likelihood with GANs for Multimodal Conditional Generation · ICLR (Poster) 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › contrastive learning › negative sampling
hard negative mining |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Improving Occlusion and Hard Negative Handling for Single-Stage Pedestrian Detectors · CVPR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transformer · 1.5neural network · 1.2survey · 0.9knowledge distillation · 0.9in-context learning · 0.9sequential bayesian update · 0.8meta-learning · 0.8meta-continual learning · 0.7dirichlet process mixture model · 0.4generative adversarial network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Distilling Reinforcement Learning Algorithms for In-Context Model-Based PlanningabstractRecent studies have shown that Transformers can perform in-context reinforcement learning (RL) by imitating existing RL algorithms, enabling sample-efficient adaptation to unseen tasks without parameter updates. However, these models also inherit the suboptimal behaviors of the RL algorithms they imitate. This issue primarily arises due to the gradual update rule employed by those algorithms. Model-based planning offers a promising solution to this limitation by allowing the models to simulate potential outcomes before taking action, providing an additional mechanism to deviate from the suboptimal behavior. Rather than learning a separate dynamics model, we propose Distillation for In-Context Planning (DICP), an in-context model-based RL framework where Transformers simultaneously learn environment dynamics and improve policy in-context. We evaluate DICP across a range of discrete and continuous environments, including Darkroom variants and Meta-World. Our results show that DICP achieves state-of-the-art performance while requiring significantly fewer environment interactions than baselines, which include both model-free counterparts and existing meta-RL methods. Jaehyeon Son, Soochan Lee, Gunhee Kim |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2025 | When Meta-Learning Meets Online and Continual Learning: A SurveyabstractOver the past decade, deep neural networks have demonstrated significant success using the training scheme that involves mini-batch stochastic gradient descent on extensive datasets. Expanding upon this accomplishment, there has been a surge in research exploring the application of neural networks in other learning scenarios. One notable framework that has garnered significant attention is meta-learning. Often described as "learning to learn," meta-learning is a data-driven approach to optimize the learning algorithm. Other branches of interest are continual learning and online learning, both of which involve incrementally updating a model with streaming data. While these frameworks were initially developed independently, recent works have started investigating their combinations, proposing novel problem settings and learning algorithms. However, due to the elevated complexity and lack of unified terminology, discerning differences between the learning frameworks can be challenging even for experienced researchers. To facilitate a clear understanding, this paper provides a comprehensive survey that organizes various problem settings using consistent terminology and formal descriptions. By offering an overview of these learning paradigms, our work aims to foster further advancements in this promising area of research. Jaehyeon Son, Soochan Lee, Gunhee Kim |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2024 | Learning to Continually Learn with the Bayesian PrincipleabstractIn the present era of deep learning, continual learning research is mainly focused on mitigating forgetting when training a neural network with stochastic gradient descent on a non-stationary stream of data. On the other hand, in the more classical literature of statistical machine learning, many models have sequential Bayesian update rules that yield the same learning outcome as the batch training, i.e., they are completely immune to catastrophic forgetting. However, they are often overly simple to model complex real-world data. In this work, we adopt the meta-learning paradigm to combine the strong representational power of neural networks and simple statistical models’ robustness to forgetting. In our novel meta-continual learning framework, continual learning takes place only in statistical models via ideal sequential Bayesian update rules, while neural networks are meta-learned to bridge the raw data and the statistical models. Since the neural networks remain fixed during continual learning, they are protected from catastrophic forgetting. This approach not only achieves significantly improved performance but also exhibits excellent scalability. Since our approach is domain-agnostic and model-agnostic, it can be applied to a wide range of problems and easily integrated with existing model architectures. Soochan Lee, Hyeonseong Jeon, Jaehyeon Son, Gunhee Kim |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Recasting Continual Learning as Sequence ModelingabstractIn this work, we aim to establish a strong connection between two significant bodies of machine learning research: continual learning and sequence modeling.
That is, we propose to formulate continual learning as a sequence modeling problem, allowing advanced sequence models to be utilized for continual learning.
Under this formulation, the continual learning process becomes the forward pass of a sequence model.
By adopting the meta-continual learning (MCL) framework, we can train the sequence model at the meta-level, on multiple continual learning episodes.
As a specific example of our new formulation, we demonstrate the application of Transformers and their efficient variants as MCL methods.
Our experiments on seven benchmarks, covering both classification and regression, show that sequence models can be an attractive solution for general MCL. Soochan Lee, Jaehyeon Son, Gunhee Kim |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | A Neural Dirichlet Process Mixture Model for Task-Free Continual Learning
Soochan Lee, Junsoo Ha, Dongsu Zhang, Gunhee Kim |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2019 | Harmonizing Maximum Likelihood with GANs for Multimodal Conditional Generation
Soochan Lee, Junsoo Ha, Gunhee Kim |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2018 | Improving Occlusion and Hard Negative Handling for Single-Stage Pedestrian DetectorsabstractWe propose methods of addressing two critical issues of pedestrian detection: (i) occlusion of target objects as false negative failure, and (ii) confusion with hard negative examples like vertical structures as false positive failure. Our solutions to these two problems are general and flexible enough to be applicable to any single-stage detection models. We implement our methods into four state-of-the-art single-stage models, including SqueezeDet+ [22], YOLOv2 [17], SSD [12], and DSSD [8]. We empirically validate that our approach indeed improves the performance of those four models on Caltech pedestrian [4] and CityPersons dataset [25]. Moreover, in some heavy occlusion settings, our approach achieves the best reported performance. Specifically, our two solutions are as follows. For better occlusion handling, we update the output tensors of single-stage models so that they include the prediction of part confidence scores, from which we compute a final occlusion-aware detection score. For reducing confusion with hard negative examples, we introduce average grid classifiers as post-refinement classifiers, trainable in an end-to-end fashion with little memory and time overhead (e.g. increase of 1-5 MB in memory and 1-2 ms in inference time). Junhyug Noh, Soochan Lee, Gunhee Kim |
CVPR | 2 |