VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Tanmayee Narendra
dblp:230/3979
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 75% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 25% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causal Discovery from Conditionally Stationary Time Series · ICML 2025 |
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
causal reasoning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causal Discovery from Conditionally Stationary Time Series · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models
latent variable model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causal Discovery from Conditionally Stationary Time Series · ICML 2025 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
time series causal discovery |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Causal Discovery from Conditionally Stationary Time Series · ICML 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
recurrent neural network · 0.9latent state modeling · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Causal Discovery from Conditionally Stationary Time SeriesabstractCausal discovery, i.e., inferring underlying causal relationships from observational data, is highly challenging for AI systems. In a time series modeling context, traditional causal discovery methods mainly consider constrained scenarios with fully observed variables and/or data from stationary time-series. We develop a causal discovery approach to handle a wide class of nonstationary time series that are _conditionally stationary_, where the nonstationary behaviour is modeled as stationarity conditioned on a set of latent state variables. Named State-Dependent Causal Inference (SDCI), our approach is able to recover the underlying causal dependencies, with provable identifiablity for the state-dependent causal structures. Empirical experiments on nonlinear particle interaction data and gene regulatory networks demonstrate SDCI's superior performance over baseline causal discovery methods. Improved results over non-causal RNNs on modeling NBA player movements demonstrate the potential of our method and motivate the use of causality-driven methods for forecasting. Carles Balsells Rodas, Xavier Sumba, Tanmayee Narendra, Ruibo Tu, Gabriele Beate Schweikert, Hedvig Kjellström, Yingzhen Li |
ICML | 3 |