Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Abby Stevens

dblp:230/4066 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 50% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 25% Learning theory · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › confidence set construction
confidence bounds
0.612022
Lazy Estimation of Variable Importance for Large Neural Networks · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability
feature importance
0.612022
Lazy Estimation of Variable Importance for Large Neural Networks · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.612022
Lazy Estimation of Variable Importance for Large Neural Networks · ICML 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
statistical inference
0.612022
Lazy Estimation of Variable Importance for Large Neural Networks · ICML 2022

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

ridge penalty · 0.6linearization · 0.6asymptotic normality · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Lazy Estimation of Variable Importance for Large Neural Networks
abstract
As opaque predictive models increasingly impact many areas of modern life, interest in quantifying the importance of a given input variable for making a specific prediction has grown. Recently, there has been a proliferation of model-agnostic methods to measure variable importance (VI) that analyze the difference in predictive power between a full model trained on all variables and a reduced model that excludes the variable(s) of interest. A bottleneck common to these methods is the estimation of the reduced model for each variable (or subset of variables), which is an expensive process that often does not come with theoretical guarantees. In this work, we propose a fast and flexible method for approximating the reduced model with important inferential guarantees. We replace the need for fully retraining a wide neural network by a linearization initialized at the full model parameters. By adding a ridge-like penalty to make the problem convex, we prove that when the ridge penalty parameter is sufficiently large, our method estimates the variable importance measure with an error rate of O(1/n) where n is the number of training samples. We also show that our estimator is asymptotically normal, enabling us to provide confidence bounds for the VI estimates. We demonstrate through simulations that our method is fast and accurate under several data-generating regimes, and we demonstrate its real-world applicability on a seasonal climate forecasting example.
Abby Stevens, Garvesh Raskutti, Rebecca Willett
ICML2