Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

You Qiaoben

dblp:230/4185 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
3 papers
Reinforcement learning · 30% Efficient and distributed learning · 23% Trustworthy machine learning · 23%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Data integration and cleaning · 50% Machine learning and data management · 50%

Topics — the 9 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › robust reinforcement learning
adversarial reinforcement learning
0.812024
Understanding adversarial attacks on observations in deep reinforcement learning · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
adversarial robustness
0.812024
Understanding adversarial attacks on observations in deep reinforcement learning · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2024
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.412019
Max-Margin Majority Voting for Learning from Crowds · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression › quantization › quantized neural network
binary neural network
0.412019
Composite Binary Decomposition Networks · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Graph learning › graph algorithms
graph decomposition
0.412019
Composite Binary Decomposition Networks · AAAI 2019
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression
0.412019
Composite Binary Decomposition Networks · AAAI 2019
Data integration and cleaning › truth discovery
crowdsourced label aggregation
0.412019
Max-Margin Majority Voting for Learning from Crowds · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019
Machine learning and data management › weak supervision
learning from crowds
0.412019
Max-Margin Majority Voting for Learning from Crowds · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
deep reinforcement learning
0.212024
Understanding adversarial attacks on observations in deep reinforcement learning · Sci. China Inf. Sci. 2024

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

max-margin majority voting · 0.8dawid-skene estimator · 0.8confusion matrix modeling · 0.8binary decomposition · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Understanding adversarial attacks on observations in deep reinforcement learning
You Qiaoben, Chengyang Ying, Xinning Zhou, Hang Su 0006, Jun Zhu 0001, Bo Zhang 0010
Sci. China Inf. Sci.1
2023 Consistent attack: Universal adversarial perturbation on embodied vision navigation
Chengyang Ying, You Qiaoben, Xinning Zhou, Hang Su 0006, Wenbo Ding 0004, Jianyong Ai
Pattern Recognit. Lett.2
2019 Composite Binary Decomposition Networks
You Qiaoben, Zheng Wang 0059, Yinpeng Dong, Yu-Gang Jiang 0001, Jun Zhu 0001
AAAI1
2019 Max-Margin Majority Voting for Learning from Crowds
abstract
Learning-from-crowds aims to design proper aggregation strategies to infer the unknown true labels from the noisy labels provided by ordinary web workers. This paper presents max-margin majority voting (M$^3$3V) to improve the discriminative ability of majority voting and further presents a Bayesian generalization to incorporate the flexibility of generative methods on modeling noisy observations with worker confusion matrices for different application settings. We first introduce the crowdsourcing margin of majority voting, then we formulate the joint learning as a regularized Bayesian inference (RegBayes) problem, where the posterior regularization is derived by maximizing the margin between the aggregated score of a potential true label and that of any alternative label. Our Bayesian model naturally covers the Dawid-Skene estimator and M$^3$3V as its two special cases. Due to the flexibility of our model, we extend it to handle crowdsourced labels with an ordinal structure with the main ideas about the crowdsourcing margin unchanged. Moreover, we consider an online learning-from-crowds setting where labels coming in a stream. Empirical results demonstrate that our methods are competitive, often achieving better results than state-of-the-art estimators.
Tian Tian 0001, Jun Zhu 0001, You Qiaoben
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell.3