VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sunghwan Joo
dblp:230/4203
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-0535-7853ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 65% Deep learning architectures and training · 22% Representation and self-supervised learning · 7% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video processing · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Medical and health informatics · 51% Energy systems and smart grids · 49% |
Topics — the 18 heaviest of 19, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
1.0 | 2 | 2023 | Towards More Robust Interpretation via Local Gradient Alignment · AAAI 2023 Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulation · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
1.0 | 2 | 2023 | Towards More Robust Interpretation via Local Gradient Alignment · AAAI 2023 Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulation · NeurIPS 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › attribution methods
feature attribution |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards More Robust Interpretation via Local Gradient Alignment · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explanation evaluation
feature attribution robustness |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Towards More Robust Interpretation via Local Gradient Alignment · AAAI 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer › vision transformer
swin transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SwiFT: Swin 4D fMRI Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | SwiFT: Swin 4D fMRI Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Subtask Gated Networks for Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › visual explanation
saliency map |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulation · NeurIPS 2019 |
Energy systems and smart grids
energy disaggregation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Subtask Gated Networks for Non-Intrusive Load Monitoring · AAAI 2019 |
Image and video processing › image restoration
image denoising |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | DoPAMINE: Double-Sided Masked CNN for Pixel Adaptive Multiplicative Noise Despeckling · AAAI 2019 |
Image and video processing
image restoration |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | DoPAMINE: Double-Sided Masked CNN for Pixel Adaptive Multiplicative Noise Despeckling · AAAI 2019 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising › non-gaussian noise removal
multiplicative noise removal |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | DoPAMINE: Double-Sided Masked CNN for Pixel Adaptive Multiplicative Noise Despeckling · AAAI 2019 |
Image and video processing › image restoration › image denoising
speckle reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | DoPAMINE: Double-Sided Masked CNN for Pixel Adaptive Multiplicative Noise Despeckling · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
contrastive learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | SwiFT: Swin 4D fMRI Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › unsupervised representation learning
self-supervised representation learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | SwiFT: Swin 4D fMRI Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Medical and health informatics › neuroimaging › neuroimaging analysis
fMRI analysis |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | SwiFT: Swin 4D fMRI Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Medical and health informatics
neuroimaging |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | SwiFT: Swin 4D fMRI Transformer · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › explanation evaluation
explanation stability |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model Manipulation · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
explainable AI · 1.3contrastive loss · 1.34d window multi-head self-attention · 1.3regression · 0.8deep neural network · 0.8classification · 0.8hessian norm minimization · 0.7gradient regularization · 0.7cosine distance criterion · 0.7neural adaptive image denoising · 0.4masked CNN · 0.4fine-tuning with interpretation penalty · 0.4fine-tuning · 0.4convolutional neural network · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023 | Towards More Robust Interpretation via Local Gradient AlignmentabstractNeural network interpretation methods, particularly feature attribution methods, are known to be fragile with respect to adversarial input perturbations. To address this, several methods for enhancing the local smoothness of the gradient while training have been proposed for attaining robust feature attributions. However, the lack of considering the normalization of the attributions, which is essential in their visualizations, has been an obstacle to understanding and improving the robustness of feature attribution methods. In this paper, we provide new insights by taking such normalization into account. First, we show that for every non-negative homogeneous neural network, a naive l2-robust criterion for gradients is not normalization invariant, which means that two functions with the same normalized gradient can have different values. Second, we formulate a normalization invariant cosine distance-based criterion and derive its upper bound, which gives insight for why simply minimizing the Hessian norm at the input, as has been done in previous work, is not sufficient for attaining robust feature attribution. Finally, we propose to combine both l2 and cosine distance-based criteria as regularization terms to leverage the advantages of both in aligning the local gradient. As a result, we experimentally show that models trained with our method produce much more robust interpretations on CIFAR-10 and ImageNet-100 without significantly hurting the accuracy, compared to the recent baselines. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work to verify the robustness of interpretation on a larger-scale dataset beyond CIFAR-10, thanks to the computational efficiency of our method. Sunghwan Joo, Seokhyeon Jeong, Juyeon Heo, Adrian Weller, Taesup Moon |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2023 | SwiFT: Swin 4D fMRI TransformerabstractModeling spatiotemporal brain dynamics from high-dimensional data, such as functional Magnetic Resonance Imaging (fMRI), is a formidable task in neuroscience. Existing approaches for fMRI analysis utilize hand-crafted features, but the process of feature extraction risks losing essential information in fMRI scans. To address this challenge, we present SwiFT (Swin 4D fMRI Transformer), a Swin Transformer architecture that can learn brain dynamics directly from fMRI volumes in a memory and computation-efficient manner. SwiFT achieves this by implementing a 4D window multi-head self-attention mechanism and absolute positional embeddings. We evaluate SwiFT using multiple large-scale resting-state fMRI datasets, including the Human Connectome Project (HCP), Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development (ABCD), and UK Biobank (UKB) datasets, to predict sex, age, and cognitive intelligence. Our experimental outcomes reveal that SwiFT consistently outperforms recent state-of-the-art models. Furthermore, by leveraging its end-to-end learning capability, we show that contrastive loss-based self-supervised pre-training of SwiFT can enhance performance on downstream tasks. Additionally, we employ an explainable AI method to identify the brain regions associated with sex classification. To our knowledge, SwiFT is the first Swin Transformer architecture to process dimensional spatiotemporal brain functional data in an end-to-end fashion. Our work holds substantial potential in facilitating scalable learning of functional brain imaging in neuroscience research by reducing the hurdles associated with applying Transformer models to high-dimensional fMRI. Peter Yongho Kim, Junbeom Kwon 0002, Sunghwan Joo, Sangyoon Bae, Donggyu Lee, Yoonho Jung, Shinjae Yoo, Jiook Cha, Taesup Moon |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2019 | DoPAMINE: Double-Sided Masked CNN for Pixel Adaptive Multiplicative Noise DespecklingabstractWe propose DoPAMINE, a new neural network based multiplicative noise despeckling algorithm. Our algorithm is inspired by Neural AIDE (N-AIDE), which is a recently proposed neural adaptive image denoiser. While the original NAIDE was designed for the additive noise case, we show that the same framework, i.e., adaptively learning a network for pixel-wise affine denoisers by minimizing an unbiased estimate of MSE, can be applied to the multiplicative noise case as well. Moreover, we derive a double-sided masked CNN architecture which can control the variance of the activation values in each layer and converge fast to high denoising performance during supervised training. In the experimental results, we show our DoPAMINE possesses high adaptivity via fine-tuning the network parameters based on the given noisy image and achieves significantly better despeckling results compared to SAR-DRN, a state-of-the-art CNN-based algorithm. Sunghwan Joo, Sungmin Cha, Taesup Moon |
AAAI | 1 |
| 2019 | Subtask Gated Networks for Non-Intrusive Load MonitoringabstractNon-intrusive load monitoring (NILM), also known as energy disaggregation, is a blind source separation problem where a household’s aggregate electricity consumption is broken down into electricity usages of individual appliances. In this way, the cost and trouble of installing many measurement devices over numerous household appliances can be avoided, and only one device needs to be installed. The problem has been well-known since Hart’s seminal paper in 1992, and recently significant performance improvements have been achieved by adopting deep networks. In this work, we focus on the idea that appliances have on/off states, and develop a deep network for further performance improvements. Specifically, we propose a subtask gated network that combines the main regression network with an on/off classification subtask network. Unlike typical multitask learning algorithms where multiple tasks simply share the network parameters to take advantage of the relevance among tasks, the subtask gated network multiply the main network’s regression output with the subtask’s classification probability. When standby-power is additionally learned, the proposed solution surpasses the state-of-the-art performance for most of the benchmark cases. The subtask gated network can be very effective for any problem that inherently has on/off states. Changho Shin, Sunghwan Joo, Jaeryun Yim, Hyoseop Lee, Taesup Moon, Wonjong Rhee |
AAAI | 2 |
| 2019 | Fooling Neural Network Interpretations via Adversarial Model ManipulationabstractWe ask whether the neural network interpretation methods can be fooled via adversarial model manipulation, which is defined as a model fine-tuning step that aims to radically alter the explanations without hurting the accuracy of the original models, e.g., VGG19, ResNet50, and DenseNet121. By incorporating the interpretation results directly in the penalty term of the objective function for fine-tuning, we show that the state-of-the-art saliency map based interpreters, e.g., LRP, Grad-CAM, and SimpleGrad, can be easily fooled with our model manipulation. We propose two types of fooling, Passive and Active, and demonstrate such foolings generalize well to the entire validation set as well as transfer to other interpretation methods. Our results are validated by both visually showing the fooled explanations and reporting quantitative metrics that measure the deviations from the original explanations. We claim that the stability of neural network interpretation method with respect to our adversarial model manipulation is an important criterion to check for developing robust and reliable neural network interpretation method. Juyeon Heo, Sunghwan Joo, Taesup Moon |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2007 | Effect of Story Programming Embedded Problem Solving Strategies on the Problem Solving Ability
JungHo Park, JungBum Song, Sunghwan Joo, Tae-Wuk Lee |
ICCE | 3 |