VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Iljoo Yoon
dblp:230/8603
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
2 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021 POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › learning-based combinatorial optimization
neural combinatorial optimization |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021 POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › vehicle routing
traveling salesman problem |
0.3 | 2 | 2021 | Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021 POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › shop scheduling
flow shop scheduling |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021 |
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
vehicle routing |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
end-to-end learning · 1.0attention mechanism · 1.0augmentation-based inference · 0.9REINFORCE · 0.9
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimizationabstractMachine Learning (ML) can help solve combinatorial optimization (CO) problems better. A popular approach is to use a neural net to compute on the parameters of a given CO problem and extract useful information that guides the search for good solutions. Many CO problems of practical importance can be specified in a matrix form of parameters quantifying the relationship between two groups of items. There is currently no neural net model, however, that takes in such matrix-style relationship data as an input. Consequently, these types of CO problems have been out of reach for ML engineers. In this paper, we introduce Matrix Encoding Network (MatNet) and show how conveniently it takes in and processes parameters of such complex CO problems. Using an end-to-end model based on MatNet, we solve asymmetric traveling salesman (ATSP) and flexible flow shop (FFSP) problems as the earliest neural approach. In particular, for a class of FFSP we have tested MatNet on, we demonstrate a far superior empirical performance to any methods (neural or not) known to date. Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Iljoo Yoon, Minah Park, Duwon Park, Youngjune Gwon |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2020 | POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement LearningabstractIn neural combinatorial optimization (CO), reinforcement learning (RL) can turn a deep neural net into a fast, powerful heuristic solver of NP-hard problems. This approach has a great potential in practical applications because it allows near-optimal solutions to be found without expert guides armed with substantial domain knowledge. We introduce Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima (POMO), an end-to-end approach for building such a heuristic solver. POMO is applicable to a wide range of CO problems. It is designed to exploit the symmetries in the representation of a CO solution. POMO uses a modified REINFORCE algorithm that forces diverse rollouts towards all optimal solutions. Empirically, the low-variance baseline of POMO makes RL training fast and stable, and it is more resistant to local minima compared to previous approaches. We also introduce a new augmentation-based inference method, which accompanies POMO nicely. We demonstrate the effectiveness of POMO by solving three popular NP-hard problems, namely, traveling salesman (TSP), capacitated vehicle routing (CVRP), and 0-1 knapsack (KP). For all three, our solver based on POMO shows a significant improvement in performance over all recent learned heuristics. In particular, we achieve the optimality gap of 0.14% with TSP100 while reducing inference time by more than an order of magnitude. Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Byoungjip Kim, Iljoo Yoon, Youngjune Gwon, Seungjai Min |
NeurIPS | 4 |