Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.

Iljoo Yoon

dblp:230/8603 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Theoretical computer science
2 papers
Mathematical optimization · 100%
Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Reinforcement learning · 100%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Mathematical optimization
combinatorial optimization
0.922021
Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021
POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › learning-based combinatorial optimization
neural combinatorial optimization
0.922021
Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021
POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
policy optimization
0.412020
POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization › vehicle routing
traveling salesman problem
0.322021
Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021
POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020
Mathematical optimization › scheduling › shop scheduling
flow shop scheduling
0.112021
Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization · NeurIPS 2021
Mathematical optimization › combinatorial optimization
vehicle routing
0.112020
POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning · NeurIPS 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

end-to-end learning · 1.0attention mechanism · 1.0augmentation-based inference · 0.9REINFORCE · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 Matrix encoding networks for neural combinatorial optimization
abstract
Machine Learning (ML) can help solve combinatorial optimization (CO) problems better. A popular approach is to use a neural net to compute on the parameters of a given CO problem and extract useful information that guides the search for good solutions. Many CO problems of practical importance can be specified in a matrix form of parameters quantifying the relationship between two groups of items. There is currently no neural net model, however, that takes in such matrix-style relationship data as an input. Consequently, these types of CO problems have been out of reach for ML engineers. In this paper, we introduce Matrix Encoding Network (MatNet) and show how conveniently it takes in and processes parameters of such complex CO problems. Using an end-to-end model based on MatNet, we solve asymmetric traveling salesman (ATSP) and flexible flow shop (FFSP) problems as the earliest neural approach. In particular, for a class of FFSP we have tested MatNet on, we demonstrate a far superior empirical performance to any methods (neural or not) known to date.
Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Iljoo Yoon, Minah Park, Duwon Park, Youngjune Gwon
NeurIPS3
2020 POMO: Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima for Reinforcement Learning
abstract
In neural combinatorial optimization (CO), reinforcement learning (RL) can turn a deep neural net into a fast, powerful heuristic solver of NP-hard problems. This approach has a great potential in practical applications because it allows near-optimal solutions to be found without expert guides armed with substantial domain knowledge. We introduce Policy Optimization with Multiple Optima (POMO), an end-to-end approach for building such a heuristic solver. POMO is applicable to a wide range of CO problems. It is designed to exploit the symmetries in the representation of a CO solution. POMO uses a modified REINFORCE algorithm that forces diverse rollouts towards all optimal solutions. Empirically, the low-variance baseline of POMO makes RL training fast and stable, and it is more resistant to local minima compared to previous approaches. We also introduce a new augmentation-based inference method, which accompanies POMO nicely. We demonstrate the effectiveness of POMO by solving three popular NP-hard problems, namely, traveling salesman (TSP), capacitated vehicle routing (CVRP), and 0-1 knapsack (KP). For all three, our solver based on POMO shows a significant improvement in performance over all recent learned heuristics. In particular, we achieve the optimality gap of 0.14% with TSP100 while reducing inference time by more than an order of magnitude.
Yeong-Dae Kwon, Jinho Choo, Byoungjip Kim, Iljoo Yoon, Youngjune Gwon, Seungjai Min
NeurIPS4