Peter van Hintum

dblp:231/4762 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
3since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-2323-2897ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Theory of computation · 3 · 2 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Inversion of Bayesian networks
abstract
Variational autoencoders and Helmholtz machines use a recognition network (encoder) to approximate the posterior distribution of a generative model (decoder). In this paper we establish some necessary and some sufficient properties of a recognition network so that it can model the true posterior distribution exactly. These results are derived in the general context of probabilistic graphical modelling / Bayesian networks, for which the network represents a set of conditional independence statements. We derive both global conditions, in terms of d-separation, and local conditions for the recognition network to have the desired qualities. It turns out that for the local conditions the perfectness property (for every node, all parents are joined) plays an important role.
Jesse van Oostrum, Peter van Hintum, Nihat Ay
Int. J. Approx. Reason.2
2022 Capture times in the bridge-burning cops and robbers game
Rebekah Herrman, Peter van Hintum, Stephen G. Z. Smith
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2021 The (t, r) broadcast domination number of some regular graphs
Rebekah Herrman, Peter van Hintum
Discret. Appl. Math.2
2020 Improved Bound for Tomaszewski's Problem
abstract
In 1986, Tomaszewski made the following conjecture. Given $n$ real numbers $a_{1},\ldots,a_{n}$ with $\sum_{i=1}^{n}a_{i}^{2}=1$, then of the $2^{n}$ signed sums $\pm a_{1} \pm \cdots \pm a_{n}$, at least half have absolute value at most 1. Hendriks and van Zuijlen [ An Improvement of the Boppana-Holzman Bound for Rademacher Random Variables}, arXiv:2003.02588, 2020] and Boppana, Hendriks, and van Zuijlen [ Tomaszewski's Problem on Randomly Signed Sums, Revisited, arXiv:2003.06433, 2020] independently proved that a proportion of at least 0.4276 of these sums has absolute value at most 1. Using different techniques, we improve this bound to 0.46.
Vojtech Dvorák, Peter van Hintum, Marius Tiba
SIAM J. Discret. Math.2