VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Huawei Lin 0001
dblp:231/5005-1
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-2965-3158ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 3 first-author · 4 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 1 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
2 papers |
Information retrieval · 53% Indexing and storage engines · 27% Machine learning and data management · 20% | |
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Algorithms and data structures · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › similarity search › nearest neighbor search
approximate nearest neighbor search |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Locality-Sensitive Indexing for Graph-Based Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search · SIGIR 2025 |
Information retrieval › similarity search › nearest neighbor search › approximate nearest neighbor search
graph-based ANNS |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Locality-Sensitive Indexing for Graph-Based Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search · SIGIR 2025 |
Indexing and storage engines
index maintenance |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Locality-Sensitive Indexing for Graph-Based Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search · SIGIR 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI › data influence
influence estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Token-wise Influential Training Data Retrieval for Large Language Models · ACL (1) 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
machine unlearning |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Machine Unlearning in Gradient Boosting Decision Trees · KDD 2023 |
Algorithms and data structures › data structure design › search structures › hashing
locality-sensitive hashing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Locality-Sensitive Indexing for Graph-Based Approximate Nearest Neighbor Search · SIGIR 2025 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
proximity graph · 1.7locality-sensitive hashing · 1.7lazy update · 1.3gradient boosting decision tree · 1.3influence functions · 0.8gradient compression · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ALinFiK: Learning to Approximate Linearized Future Influence Kernel for Scalable Third-Parity LLM Data ValuationabstractYanzhou Pan, Huawei Lin, Yide Ran, Jiamin Chen, Xiaodong Yu, Weijie Zhao, Denghui Zhang, Zhaozhuo Xu. Proceedings of the 2025 Conference of the Nations of the Americas Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Yanzhou Pan, Huawei Lin 0001, Yide Ran, Weijie Zhao 0001, Zhaozhuo Xu |
NAACL (Long Papers) | 2 |
| 2025 | Locality-Sensitive Indexing for Graph-Based Approximate Nearest Neighbor SearchabstractThe burgeoning size of modern text datasets has heightened the need for efficient text retrieval systems. For such applications, Approximate Nearest Neighbor (ANN) search algorithms, and in particular graph-based methods have long been established as the leading approach in terms of recall and search speed. However, the data and execution dependencies of vertices increase the construction workload and complicate maintenance processes for the constructed index. In this paper, we present Locality-Sensitive Indexing for Graph-Based Search (or LIGS), which utilizes independent locality-sensitive hashing algorithms to simulate a proximity graph, on which a standard graph search can be performed. We show that LIGS offers substantially faster maintenance (insertion/deletion) speeds and better conservation of graph quality compared to state-of-the-art graph-based ANN methods, demonstrating LIGS as a promising alternative for maintenance-heavy scenarios. Jun Woo Chung, Huawei Lin 0001, Weijie Zhao 0001 |
SIGIR | 2 |
| 2024 | Token-wise Influential Training Data Retrieval for Large Language ModelsabstractGiven a Large Language Model (LLM) generation, how can we identify which training data led to this generation?In this paper, we proposed RapidIn, a scalable framework adapting to LLMs for estimating the influence of each training data.The proposed framework consists of two stages: caching and retrieval.First, we compress the gradient vectors by over 200,000x, allowing them to be cached on disk or in GPU/CPU memory.Then, given a generation, RapidIn efficiently traverses the cached gradients to estimate the influence within minutes, achieving over a 6,326x speedup.Moreover, RapidIn supports multi-GPU parallelization to substantially accelerate caching and retrieval.Our empirical result confirms the efficiency and effectiveness of RapidIn. Huawei Lin 0001, Jikai Long, Zhaozhuo Xu, Weijie Zhao 0001 |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2023 | Activation Template Matching Loss for Explainable Face RecognitionabstractCan we construct an explainable face recognition network able to learn a facial part-based feature like eyes, nose, mouth and so forth, without any manual annotation or additionalsion datasets? In this paper, we propose a generic Explainable Channel Loss (ECLoss) to construct an explainable face recognition network. The explainable network trained with ECLoss can easily learn the facial part-based representation on the target convolutional layer, where an individual channel can detect a certain face part. Our experiments on dozens of datasets show that ECLoss achieves superior explainability metrics, and at the same time improves the performance of face verification without face alignment. In addition, our visualization results also illustrate the effectiveness of the proposed ECLoss. Huawei Lin 0001, Qiufu Li, LinLin Shen |
FG | 1 |
| 2023 | Machine Unlearning in Gradient Boosting Decision TreesabstractVarious machine learning applications take users' data to train the models. Recently enforced legislation requires companies to remove users' data upon requests, i.e.,the right to be forgotten. In the context of machine learning, the trained model potentially memorizes the training data. Machine learning algorithms have to be able to unlearn the user data that are requested to delete to meet the requirement. Gradient Boosting Decision Trees (GBDT) is a widely deployed model in many machine learning applications. However, few studies investigate the unlearning on GBDT. This paper proposes a novel unlearning framework for GBDT. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work that considers machine unlearning on GBDT. It is not straightforward to transfer the unlearning methods of DNN to GBDT settings. We formalized the machine unlearning problem and its relaxed version. We propose an unlearning framework that efficiently and effectively unlearns a given collection of data without retraining the model from scratch. We introduce a collection of techniques, including random split point selection and random partitioning layers training, to the training process of the original tree models to ensure that the trained model requires few subtree retrainings during the unlearning. We investigate the intermediate data and statistics to store as an auxiliary data structure during the training so that we can immediately determine if a subtree is required to be retrained without touching the original training dataset. Furthermore, a lazy update technique is proposed as a trade-off between unlearning time and model functionality. We experimentally evaluate our proposed methods on public datasets. The empirical results confirm the effectiveness of our framework. Huawei Lin 0001, Jun Woo Chung, Yingjie Lao, Weijie Zhao 0001 |
KDD | 1 |