Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Pengyuan Lu
dblp:231/5742
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
0as first author
5since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0003-2795-6339ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 2 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 since 2021Theory of computation · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Embedded and real-time systems · 100% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Cyber-physical and IoT security · 100% | |
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Embedded and real-time systems
cyber-physical systems |
0.9 | 2 | 2024 | Deadline-Safe Reach-Avoid Control Synthesis for Cyber-Physical Systems with Reinforcement Learning · RTSS 2024 Fail-Safe: Securing Cyber-Physical Systems against Hidden Sensor Attacks · RTSS 2022 |
Cyber-physical and IoT security › cyber-physical attack detection
sensor attack detection |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Fail-Safe: Securing Cyber-Physical Systems against Hidden Sensor Attacks · RTSS 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
safe reinforcement learning |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Deadline-Safe Reach-Avoid Control Synthesis for Cyber-Physical Systems with Reinforcement Learning · RTSS 2024 |
Embedded and real-time systems › real-time system verification
safety verification |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Fail-Safe: Securing Cyber-Physical Systems against Hidden Sensor Attacks · RTSS 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
reinforcement learning · 1.5markov decision process · 1.5optimization · 1.1offline profiling · 1.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Model-free PAC Time-Optimal Control Synthesis with Reinforcement LearningabstractReaching a target safely and quickly is a control goal pursued by various applications, such as post-disaster rescue robots and industrial shipment. However, it is hard to formally guarantee safety and time-optimality under unknown dynamics via model-free controller synthesis algorithms. As a response, we propose a model-free reinforcement learning (RL) algorithm that synthesize a controller to reach a predefined target set of states with a probabilistic guarantee of time optimality, i.e., the actual reaching time is bounded close to the shortest time possible with high probability, and the bound becomes tighter when more training data is sampled. Our algorithm leverages a reward function that based on signal temporal logic (STL) robustness to reward fast reaching. With this reward function, we prove that Probably Approximately Correct (PAC) optimality in the state-value function implies PAC optimality in reach time. Then, we build our algorithm by extending Deplayed Gaussian Process Q learning (DGPQ) algorithm with a safety margin to protect the controlled agent. Consequently, our algorithm guarantees safety and a PAC bound in recovery time. Experiments show our method can achieve $\mathbf{9 7. 7 \%}$ success rate to reach the target with in the maximum time tolerance and outperform baselines. Pengyuan Lu, Xin Chen 0002, Oleg Sokolsky, Insup Lee 0001, Fanxin Kong |
MEMOCODE | 2 |
| 2024 | Deadline-Safe Reach-Avoid Control Synthesis for Cyber-Physical Systems with Reinforcement LearningabstractMeeting deadlines is a fundamental requirement of cyber-physical systems (CPS) in real-time applications to consolidate their reliability and effectiveness in executing timecritical tasks. Recent research have focused on applying reinforcement learning to synthesize controllers for real-time systems, particularly in terms of achieving fast reach-avoid. However, achieving fast behavior does not necessarily equate to meeting deadlines. Sometimes reinforcement learning agents are trying to maximize the total reward by exploiting the reward function, and thus performing unwanted behavior, known as reward hacking. Therefore, depending on the deadlines, it is possible to have fast controllers that miss the deadlines and slow controllers that meet the deadlines. To address the misalignment between fast and meeting deadlines, we investigate the relationship between as soon as possible (ASAP) and deadline-safe. Additionally, we formulate the problem into a new Markov decision process R-MDP including time to avoid non-Markovian rewards when considering deadlines. Furthermore, we have designed new reward functions that encourage the agent to meet the deadlines. Moreover, we evaluate our method on various benchmarks. The experiment results show the effectiveness of our method in ensuring deadline compliance without compromising safety. Pengyuan Lu, Xin Chen 0002, Oleg Sokolsky, Insup Lee 0001, Fanxin Kong |
RTSS | 2 |
| 2023 | Real-Time Data-Predictive Attack-Recovery for Complex Cyber-Physical SystemsabstractCyber-physical systems (CPSs) leverage computations to operate physical objects in real-world environments, and increasingly more CPS-based applications have been designed for life-critical applications. Therefore, any vulnerability in such a system can lead to severe consequences if exploited by adversaries. In this paper, we present a data predictive recovery system to safeguard the CPS from sensor attacks, assuming that we can identify compromised sensors from data. Our recovery system guarantees that the CPS will never encounter unsafe states and will smoothly recover to a target set within a conservative deadline. It also guarantees that the CPS will remain within the target set for a specified period. Major highlights of our paper include (i) the recovery procedure works on nonlinear systems, (ii) the method leverages uncorrupted sensors to relieve uncertainty accumulation, and (iii) an extensive set of experiments on various nonlinear benchmarks that demonstrate our framework’s performance and efficiency. Lin Zhang 0039, Kaustubh Sridhar, Pengyuan Lu, Xin Chen 0002, Fanxin Kong, Oleg Sokolsky, Insup Lee 0001 |
RTAS | 4 |
| 2022 | Fail-Safe: Securing Cyber-Physical Systems against Hidden Sensor AttacksabstractIn Cyber-Physical Systems (CPS), integrating new technologies that interact with and control physical systems raises new security risks beyond the classical cyber security domain. These risks motivated many attack detectors that focus on the binary outcome. However, one pressing risk in CPS is hidden sensor attacks that are well-designed by powerful attackers who gained full knowledge of our systems and detector. The hidden attacks inject such a small malicious signal into sensor measurement that they can stay undetected but eventually lead to a significant deviation. Thus, to secure the CPS, we propose a detection framework to identify these sensor attacks that can drive the system's physical states to an unsafe state within a given period, even if they are not detected. First, we solve optimization problems to find the optimal hidden sensor attack that leads to the minimal distance to a pre-defined unsafe state region within an observation window for a given system and detector. Then, based on this algorithm, we perform offline profiling to search for a conditionally safe region, where the system states are guaranteed to be safe within the observation window as long as the detector does not raise any alerts. Finally, the framework can online discover potential hidden sensor attacks that endanger the system by checking if the current system state moves out of the region and raising a yellow alert. The evaluation shows that the optimal hidden sensor attack results in the minimum distance to unsafe, within a given observation window among existing hidden sensor attacks. We implemented our method on four linear simulators to show the effectiveness of our method. Additionally, we provided a discussion on the challenges of applying the proposed method to non-linear systems. Lin Zhang 0039, Pengyuan Lu, Kaustubh Sridhar, Fanxin Kong, Oleg Sokolsky, Insup Lee 0001 |
RTSS | 3 |
| 2021 | Real-time Attack-recovery for Cyber-physical Systems Using Linear-quadratic RegulatorabstractThe increasing autonomy and connectivity in cyber-physical systems (CPS) come with new security vulnerabilities that are easily exploitable by malicious attackers to spoof a system to perform dangerous actions. While the vast majority of existing works focus on attack prevention and detection, the key question is “what to do after detecting an attack?”. This problem attracts fairly rare attention though its significance is emphasized by the need to mitigate or even eliminate attack impacts on a system. In this article, we study this attack response problem and propose novel real-time recovery for securing CPS. First, this work’s core component is a recovery control calculator using a Linear-Quadratic Regulator (LQR) with timing and safety constraints. This component can smoothly steer back a physical system under control to a target state set before a safe deadline and maintain the system state in the set once it is driven to it. We further propose an Alternating Direction Method of Multipliers (ADMM) based algorithm that can fast solve the LQR-based recovery problem. Second, supporting components for the attack recovery computation include a checkpointer, a state reconstructor, and a deadline estimator. To realize these components respectively, we propose (i) a sliding-window-based checkpointing protocol that governs sufficient trustworthy data, (ii) a state reconstruction approach that uses the checkpointed data to estimate the current system state, and (iii) a reachability-based approach to conservatively estimate a safe deadline. Finally, we implement our approach and demonstrate its effectiveness in dealing with totally 15 experimental scenarios which are designed based on 5 CPS simulators and 3 types of sensor attacks. Lin Zhang 0039, Pengyuan Lu, Fanxin Kong, Xin Chen 0002, Oleg Sokolsky, Insup Lee 0001 |
ACM Trans. Embed. Comput. Syst. | 2 |