Process mining enables organizations to discover, monitor, and analyze their work processes based on data. A fundamental requirement for initiating a process mining project is the availability of an event log, which is not always readily available. In such cases, extracting an event log typically involves various time-consuming tasks, such as writing custom structured query language (SQL) scripts to extract relevant data into an event log format from a relational database. In this work, we explore the potential of large language models (LLMs) to support event log extraction for process mining by leveraging LLMs’ ability to produce SQL scripts. We evaluate the effectiveness of LLMs in assisting this process and analyze their performance across a range of scenarios. Despite the inherent non-determinism of LLM outputs, our findings highlight the potential of future LLM-assisted tools in automating event log extraction, particularly when provided with the appropriate domain and data knowledge context. The implementation of such tools could democratize access to process mining by reducing the need for specialized technical expertise for producing relational database query scripts and minimizing manual effort.

Abstract Knowledge-intensive processes represent a particularly challenging scenario for process mining. The flexibility that such processes allow constitutes a hurdle as they are hard to capture in a single model. To tackle this problem, multiple visual representations of the same processes could be beneficial, each addressing different information dimensions according to the specific needs and background knowledge of the concrete process workers and stakeholders. In this paper, we propose, describe, and evaluate a framework, named , that leverages visual analytics for the interactive visualization of multi-faceted process information, aimed at supporting the investigation and insight generation of users in their process analysis tasks. is based on a multi-layer visualization methodology that includes a visual backdrop that provides context and an arbitrary number of superimposed and on-demand dimension layers. This arrangement allows our framework to display process information from different perspectives and to project this information onto a domain-friendly representation of the context in which the process unfolds. We provide an in-depth description of the approach’s founding principles, deeply rooted in visualization research, that justify our design choices for the whole framework. We demonstrate the feasibility of the framework through its application in two use-case scenarios in the context of healthcare and personal information management. Plus, we conducted qualitative evaluations with potential end users of both scenarios, gathering precious insights about the efficacy and applicability of our framework to various application domains.

For a range of reasons, organisations collect data on the work behaviour of their employees. However, each data collection technique displays its own unique mix of intrusiveness, information richness, and risks. For the sake of understanding the differences between data collection techniques, we conducted a multiple-case study in a multinational professional services organisation, tracking six participants throughout a workday using non-participant observation, screen recording, and timesheet techniques. This led to 136 hours of data. Our findings show that relying on one data collection technique alone cannot provide a comprehensive and accurate account of activities that are screen-based, offline, or overtime. The collected data also provided an opportunity to investigate the use of process mining for analysing employee behaviour, specifically with respect to the completeness of the collected data. Our study underlines the importance of judiciously selecting data collection techniques, as well as using a sufficiently broad data set to generate reliable insights into employee behaviour.

The field of process mining has evolved from discovering single work processes towards providing broad insights into peoples’ work practices. Existing techniques can be used to analyse such work practices, but this can be problematic if the available data is limited to the use of a single IT system or is not captured at the right level of granularity. We propose the use of a personal informatics technique, called Active Window Tracking (AWT), as a new way of gathering data for mining work practices. In this study, we identify the opportunities that this technique brings through a case study within our research group. In particular, we show how AWT helps to: capture previously-unrecorded work activities, expose the relations between work processes, and navigate between different levels of data granularity. The technique, which allows for generating new data as well as complementing existing data, is a valuable asset for the community when it comes to better understanding people’s work practices across individual systems and processes.

Before the findings of a process mining project can be turned into actionable insights or recommendations, it is essential to make sure that the findings are actually valid. Therefore, the evaluation of the findings is a crucial part of a successful process mining project. Current process mining methodologies, however, fall short in providing actionable support to perform such an evaluation. This is especially true when domain experts are involved. To close this gap, we performed a literature study considering all process mining case studies published in the last two decades. In total, we identified 244 candidate papers of which we analyzed 80 in depth. Based on this literature study, we found a need for a more systematic approach for qualitative evaluations in process mining projects where domain experts are involved. Therefore, we build on these results to propose six validation strategies, which originate from qualitative research. We believe that this proposal for more rigor in the evaluation phase of process mining projects helps to move the discipline forward.