Socially assistive robots can be used as therapeutic technologies to address depression symptoms. Through three sets of workshops with individuals living with depression and clinicians, we developed design guidelines for a personalized therapeutic robot for adults living with depression. Building on the design of Therabot, workshop participants discussed various aspects of the robot's design, sensors, behaviors, and a robot connected mobile phone app. Similarities among participants and workshops included a preference for a soft textured exterior and natural colors and sounds. There were also differences - clinicians wanted the robot to be able to call for aid, while participants with depression differed in their degree of comfort in sharing data collected by the robot with clinicians.

Using socially assistive robots (SARs) as specialized companions for those living with depression to manage symptoms provides a unique opportunity for exploration of robotic systems as comfort objects. Moreover, the robotic components allow for specialized behavioral responses to particular stimuli, as preferred by the user. We have conducted semi-structured interviews with 10 participants about the zoomorphic robot’s Therabot™ desired behaviors and focus groups with five additional participants regarding the preferred sensors within the Therabot™ system. In this paper, using the data from interviews and focus groups, we explore SAR input and output for depression management. While participants overall expected the robot to respond in much similar ways as a well-trained service animal, they expressed interest in the robot understanding unique information about the environment and the user, such as when the user might need interaction.

Socially-assistive robots (SARs) hold significant potential to transform the management of chronic healthcare conditions (e.g. diabetes, Alzheimer’s, dementia) outside the clinic walls. However doing so entails embedding such autonomous robots into people’s daily lives and home living environments, which are deeply shaped by the cultural and geographic locations within which they are situated. That begs the question whether we can design autonomous interactive behaviors between SARs and humans based on universal machine learning (ML) and deep learning (DL) models of robotic sensor data that would work across such diverse environments? To investigate this, we conducted a long-term user study with 26 participants across two diverse locations (United States and South Korea) with SARs deployed in each user’s home for several weeks. We collected robotic sensor data every second of every day, combined with sophisticated ecological momentary assessment (EMA) sampling techniques, to generate a large-scale dataset of over 270 million data points representing 173 hours of randomly-sampled naturalistic interaction data between the human and SAR. Models built on that data were capable of achieving nearly 84% accuracy for detecting specific interaction modalities (AUC 0.885) when trained/tested on the same location, though suffered significant performance drops when applied to a different location. Further analysis and participant interviews showed that was likely due to differences in home living environments in the US and Korea. The results suggest that our ability to create adaptable behaviors for robotic pets may be dependent on the human-robot interaction (HRI) data available for modeling.

While Wizard-of-Oz (WOz) techniques are frequently used to supplement a machine’s abilities, extending this approach to human entities can increase experimental control in studies comparing evaluations of humans and machines in the same role. This article describes the design, implementation, and use of a WOz system for facilitating controlled verbal interactions between children and robot or human interviewers. A collaborative interface allows multiple remote wizards to combine participant responses with interaction-specific goals in order to direct a robot or human interviewer’s behavior in a consistent manner. While robot interviewers are controlled directly, human interviewers receive direction through a tablet device or via a projection system concealed from participants. In addition to the system’s technical design, we describe the division of responsibilities between wizards and insights from using the system across three extensive interview studies to facilitate a total of 217 interactions with children.