Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Manikandan Gurusankar
dblp:232/1801
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Question answering and dialogue systems · 46% Information extraction and text analysis · 30% Learning paradigms · 23% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
conversational agents |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
intent detection |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
text classification |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision · AAAI 2019 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
weakly supervised learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision · AAAI 2019 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › data annotation
data programming |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak Supervision · AAAI 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
weak supervision · 0.4search-label-propagate · 0.4data programming · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Bootstrapping Conversational Agents with Weak SupervisionabstractMany conversational agents in the market today follow a standard bot development framework which requires training intent classifiers to recognize user input. The need to create a proper set of training examples is often the bottleneck in the development process. In many occasions agent developers have access to historical chat logs that can provide a good quantity as well as coverage of training examples. However, the cost of labeling them with tens to hundreds of intents often prohibits taking full advantage of these chat logs. In this paper, we present a framework called search, label, and propagate (SLP) for bootstrapping intents from existing chat logs using weak supervision. The framework reduces hours to days of labeling effort down to minutes of work by using a search engine to find examples, then relies on a data programming approach to automatically expand the labels. We report on a user study that shows positive user feedback for this new approach to build conversational agents, and demonstrates the effectiveness of using data programming for autolabeling. While the system is developed for training conversational agents, the framework has broader application in significantly reducing labeling effort for training text classifiers. Neil Mallinar, Abhishek Shah, Rajendra Ugrani, Manikandan Gurusankar, Tin Kam Ho, Qingzi Vera Liao, Rachel K. E. Bellamy, Robert Yates, Chris Desmarais, Blake McGregor |
AAAI | 5 |