VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Albert Matveev
dblp:232/1847
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 28% Efficient and distributed learning · 28% 3D vision · 15% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers |
Geometric modeling and processing · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Light-Weight Diffusion Multiplier and Uncertainty Quantification for Fourier Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural operator
fourier neural operator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Light-Weight Diffusion Multiplier and Uncertainty Quantification for Fourier Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Light-Weight Diffusion Multiplier and Uncertainty Quantification for Fourier Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural operator |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Light-Weight Diffusion Multiplier and Uncertainty Quantification for Fourier Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
parameter reduction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Light-Weight Diffusion Multiplier and Uncertainty Quantification for Fourier Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Light-Weight Diffusion Multiplier and Uncertainty Quantification for Fourier Neural Operators · NeurIPS 2025 |
Geometric modeling and processing › shape representation › point-based representation
point cloud |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | DEF: deep estimation of sharp geometric features in 3D shapes · ACM Trans. Graph. 2022 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
surface normal estimation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | ABC: A Big CAD Model Dataset for Geometric Deep Learning · CVPR 2019 |
Geometric modeling and processing › surface reconstruction
shape reconstruction |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | ABC: A Big CAD Model Dataset for Geometric Deep Learning · CVPR 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
scalar field regression · 1.1patch fusion · 1.1deep learning · 1.1diffusion model · 0.9bayesian inference · 0.9parametric surface sampling · 0.8benchmark evaluation · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Light-Weight Diffusion Multiplier and Uncertainty Quantification for Fourier Neural OperatorsabstractOperator learning is a powerful paradigm for solving partial differential equations, with Fourier Neural Operators serving as a widely adopted foundation. However, FNOs face significant scalability challenges due to overparameterization and offer no native uncertainty quantification -- a key requirement for reliable scientific and engineering applications. Instead, neural operators rely on post hoc UQ methods that ignore geometric inductive biases. In this work, we introduce DINOZAUR: a diffusion-based neural operator parametrization with uncertainty quantification. Inspired by the structure of the heat kernel, DINOZAUR replaces the dense tensor multiplier in FNOs with a dimensionality-independent diffusion multiplier that has a single learnable time parameter per channel, drastically reducing parameter count and memory footprint without compromising predictive performance. By defining priors over those time parameters, we cast DINOZAUR as a Bayesian neural operator to yield spatially correlated outputs and calibrated uncertainty estimates. Our method achieves competitive or superior performance across several PDE benchmarks while providing efficient uncertainty quantification. Albert Matveev, Sanmitra Ghosh, Aamal Hussain, James-Michael Leahy, Michalis Michaelides |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2022 | DEF: deep estimation of sharp geometric features in 3D shapesabstractWe propose Deep Estimators of Features (DEFs), a learning-based framework for predicting sharp geometric features in sampled 3D shapes. Differently from existing data-driven methods, which reduce this problem to feature classification, we propose to regress a scalar field representing the distance from point samples to the closest feature line on local patches. Our approach is the first that scales to massive point clouds by fusing distance-to-feature estimates obtained on individual patches. We extensively evaluate our approach against related state-of-the-art methods on newly proposed synthetic and real-world 3D CAD model benchmarks. Our approach not only outperforms these (with improvements in Recall and False Positives Rates), but generalizes to real-world scans after training our model on synthetic data and fine-tuning it on a small dataset of scanned data. We demonstrate a downstream application, where we reconstruct an explicit representation of straight and curved sharp feature lines from range scan data. We make code, pre-trained models, and our training and evaluation datasets available at https://github.com/artonson/def. Albert Matveev, Ruslan Rakhimov, Alexey Artemov, Gleb Bobrovskikh, Vage Egiazarian, Emil Bogomolov, Daniele Panozzo, Denis Zorin, Evgeny Burnaev |
ACM Trans. Graph. | 1 |
| 2019 | ABC: A Big CAD Model Dataset for Geometric Deep LearningabstractWe introduce ABC-Dataset, a collection of one million Computer-Aided Design (CAD) models for research of geometric deep learning methods and applications. Each model is a collection of explicitly parametrized curves and surfaces, providing ground truth for differential quantities, patch segmentation, geometric feature detection, and shape reconstruction. Sampling the parametric descriptions of surfaces and curves allows generating data in different formats and resolutions, enabling fair comparisons for a wide range of geometric learning algorithms. As a use case for our dataset, we perform a large-scale benchmark for estimation of surface normals, comparing existing data driven methods and evaluating their performance against both the ground truth and traditional normal estimation methods. Albert Matveev, Zhongshi Jiang, Francis Williams, Alexey Artemov, Evgeny Burnaev, Marc Alexa, Denis Zorin, Daniele Panozzo |
CVPR | 2 |