Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Oladele Theophilus Sule

dblp:232/3071 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-7747-5483ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip · 39% Parallel and multicore computing · 30% Performance modeling and evaluation · 30%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Parallel and multicore computing
load balancing
0.412019
TRIDENT: A Load-Balancing Clos-Network Packet Switch With Queues Between Input and Central Stages and In-Order Forwarding · IEEE Trans. Commun. 2019
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
switch architecture
0.412019
A Split-Central-Buffered Load-Balancing Clos-Network Switch With In-Order Forwarding · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2019
Interconnection networks and networks-on-chip
packet switching
0.112019
A Split-Central-Buffered Load-Balancing Clos-Network Switch With In-Order Forwarding · IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

traffic analysis · 0.4timing analysis · 0.4simulation · 0.4deterministic scheduling · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 TRIDENT: A Load-Balancing Clos-Network Packet Switch With Queues Between Input and Central Stages and In-Order Forwarding
abstract
We propose a three-stage load balancing packet switch and its configuration scheme. The input- and central-stage switches are bufferless crossbars, and the output-stage switches are buffered crossbars. We call this switch ThRee-stage Clos-network swItch with queues at the middle stage and DEtermiNisTic scheduling (TRIDENT), and the switch is cell based. The proposed configuration scheme uses predetermined and periodic interconnection patterns in the input and central modules to load-balance and route traffic, therefore, it has low configuration complexity. The operation of the switch includes a mechanism applied at input and output modules to forward cells in sequence. TRIDENT achieves 100% throughput under uniform and nonuniform admissible traffic with independent and identical distributions (i.i.d.). The switch achieves this high performance using a low-complexity architecture while performing in-sequence forwarding and no central-stage expansion or memory speedup. We analyze the operations the configuration mechanisms perform on the traffic traversing the switch. We use this analysis to prove that the switch achieves 100% through under i.i.d. traffic. We also show that the switch forward cells in-sequence. We present a simulation analysis as a practical demonstration of the switch performance under uniform and nonuniform i.i.d. traffic.
Oladele Theophilus Sule, Roberto Rojas-Cessa
IEEE Trans. Commun.1
2019 A Split-Central-Buffered Load-Balancing Clos-Network Switch With In-Order Forwarding
abstract
We propose a configuration scheme for a load-balancing Clos-network (LBC) packet switch that has split central modules and buffers in between the split modules. Our split-central-buffered LBC switch is cell-based. The switch has four stages, namely input, central-input, central-output, and output stages. The proposed configuration scheme uses a pre-determined and periodic interconnection pattern in the input and split central modules to load-balance and route traffic. The LBC switch has low configuration complexity. The operation of the switch includes a mechanism applied at input and split-central modules to forward cells in sequence. The switch achieves 100% throughput under uniform and nonuniform admissible traffic with independent and identical distributions (i.i.d.). The switch uses no speedup nor memory expansion. We demonstrate the properties of the switch through traffic and timing analysis.
Oladele Theophilus Sule, Roberto Rojas-Cessa, Ziqian Dong, Chuan-Bi Lin
IEEE/ACM Trans. Netw.1