Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data.

Xinshi Chen

dblp:232/3197 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
7as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 7 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
8 papers
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 22% Knowledge representation and reasoning · 17% Deep learning architectures and training · 15%
Theoretical computer science
3 papers
Information theory · 69% Logic in computer science · 16% Mathematical optimization · 16%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 20 heaviest of 23, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Learning theory
provable guarantees
0.612022
Provable Learning-based Algorithm For Sparse Recovery · ICLR 2022
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
sparse recovery
0.612022
Provable Learning-based Algorithm For Sparse Recovery · ICLR 2022
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference
causal discovery
0.512021
Multi-task Learning of Order-Consistent Causal Graphs · NeurIPS 2021
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning › causal reasoning
causal graph discovery
0.512021
Multi-task Learning of Order-Consistent Causal Graphs · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › causal inference › causal discovery
directed acyclic graph learning
0.512021
Multi-task Learning of Order-Consistent Causal Graphs · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
multi-task learning
0.512021
Multi-task Learning of Order-Consistent Causal Graphs · NeurIPS 2021
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
adaptive computation
0.412020
Learning To Stop While Learning To Predict · ICML 2020
Machine learning › Learning theory › generalization
generalization theory
0.412020
Understanding Deep Architecture with Reasoning Layer · NeurIPS 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph neural network
0.412020
Efficient Probabilistic Logic Reasoning with Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Graph learning
graph structure learning
0.412020
GLAD: Learning Sparse Graph Recovery · ICLR 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
logic-based reasoning
0.412020
Efficient Probabilistic Logic Reasoning with Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2020
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Knowledge representation and reasoning
probabilistic reasoning
0.412020
Efficient Probabilistic Logic Reasoning with Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2020
Bioinformatics and computational biology › RNA biology › RNA analysis › RNA bioinformatics › RNA structure prediction
RNA secondary structure prediction
0.412020
RNA Secondary Structure Prediction By Learning Unrolled Algorithms · ICLR 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference
bayesian inference
0.412019
Particle Flow Bayes' Rule · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.412019
Generative Adversarial User Model for Reinforcement Learning Based Recommendation System · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
neural operator
0.412019
Particle Flow Bayes' Rule · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › neural differential equations
neural ordinary differential equations
0.412019
Particle Flow Bayes' Rule · ICML 2019
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › sampling
particle flow
0.412019
Particle Flow Bayes' Rule · ICML 2019
Logic in computer science › knowledge representation and reasoning › uncertainty reasoning
probabilistic logic
0.112020
Efficient Probabilistic Logic Reasoning with Graph Neural Networks · ICLR 2020
Recommender systems
reinforcement-learning-based recommendation
0.112019
Generative Adversarial User Model for Reinforcement Learning Based Recommendation System · ICML 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

sparse recovery · 1.1algorithm analysis · 1.1probabilistic logic · 0.9graph neural network · 0.9meta-learning · 0.8regularized maximum likelihood · 0.5continuous optimization · 0.5variational bayes · 0.4unrolled algorithms · 0.4sparse graph recovery · 0.4imitation learning · 0.4end-to-end training · 0.4deep learning · 0.4algorithm unrolling · 0.4generative adversarial network · 0.4deep q-network · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2022 Provable Learning-based Algorithm For Sparse Recovery
Xinshi Chen
ICLR1
2021 Multi-task Learning of Order-Consistent Causal Graphs
abstract
We consider the problem of discovering $K$ related Gaussian directed acyclic graphs (DAGs), where the involved graph structures share a consistent causal order and sparse unions of supports. Under the multi-task learning setting, we propose a $l_1/l_2$-regularized maximum likelihood estimator (MLE) for learning $K$ linear structural equation models. We theoretically show that the joint estimator, by leveraging data across related tasks, can achieve a better sample complexity for recovering the causal order (or topological order) than separate estimations. Moreover, the joint estimator is able to recover non-identifiable DAGs, by estimating them together with some identifiable DAGs. Lastly, our analysis also shows the consistency of union support recovery of the structures. To allow practical implementation, we design a continuous optimization problem whose optimizer is the same as the joint estimator and can be approximated efficiently by an iterative algorithm. We validate the theoretical analysis and the effectiveness of the joint estimator in experiments.
Xinshi Chen, Caleb Ellington, Eric P. Xing
NeurIPS1
2020 RNA Secondary Structure Prediction By Learning Unrolled Algorithms
Xinshi Chen, Yu Li 0006, Ramzan Umarov, Xin Gao 0001
ICLR1
2020 GLAD: Learning Sparse Graph Recovery
Harsh Shrivastava 0001, Xinshi Chen, Binghong Chen, Guanghui Lan, Srinivas Aluru, Han Liu 0001
ICLR2
2020 Efficient Probabilistic Logic Reasoning with Graph Neural Networks
Yuyu Zhang, Xinshi Chen, Arun Ramamurthy, Yuan Qi 0001
ICLR2
2020 Learning To Stop While Learning To Predict
abstract
There is a recent surge of interest in designing deep architectures based on the update steps in traditional algorithms, or learning neural networks to improve and replace traditional algorithms. While traditional algorithms have certain stopping criteria for outputting results at different iterations, many algorithm-inspired deep models are restricted to a “fixed-depth” for all inputs. Similar to algorithms, the optimal depth of a deep architecture may be different for different input instances, either to avoid “over-thinking”, or because we want to compute less for operations converged already. In this paper, we tackle this varying depth problem using a steerable architecture, where a feed-forward deep model and a variational stopping policy are learned together to sequentially determine the optimal number of layers for each input instance. Training such architecture is very challenging. We provide a variational Bayes perspective and design a novel and effective training procedure which decomposes the task into an oracle model learning stage and an imitation stage. Experimentally, we show that the learned deep model along with the stopping policy improves the performances on a diverse set of tasks, including learning sparse recovery, few-shot meta learning, and computer vision tasks.
Xinshi Chen, Hanjun Dai, Yu Li 0006, Xin Gao 0001
ICML1
2020 Understanding Deep Architecture with Reasoning Layer
abstract
Recently, there is a surge of interest in combining deep learning models with reasoning in order to handle more sophisticated learning tasks. In many cases, a reasoning task can be solved by an iterative algorithm. This algorithm is often unrolled, truncated, and used as a specialized layer in the deep architecture, which can be trained end-to-end with other neural components. Although such hybrid deep architectures have led to many empirical successes, theoretical understandings of such architectures, especially the interplay between algorithm layers and other neural layers, remains largely unexplored. In this paper, we take an initial step toward an understanding of such hybrid deep architectures by showing that properties of the algorithm layers, such as convergence, stability and sensitivity, are intimately related to the approximation and generalization abilities of the end-to-end model. Furthermore, our analysis matches nicely with experimental observations under various conditions, suggesting that our theory can provide useful guidelines for designing deep architectures with reasoning layers.
Xinshi Chen, Yufei Zhang 0001, Christoph Reisinger
NeurIPS1
2019 Generative Adversarial User Model for Reinforcement Learning Based Recommendation System
abstract
There are great interests as well as many challenges in applying reinforcement learning (RL) to recommendation systems. In this setting, an online user is the environment; neither the reward function nor the environment dynamics are clearly defined, making the application of RL challenging. In this paper, we propose a novel model-based reinforcement learning framework for recommendation systems, where we develop a generative adversarial network to imitate user behavior dynamics and learn her reward function. Using this user model as the simulation environment, we develop a novel Cascading DQN algorithm to obtain a combinatorial recommendation policy which can handle a large number of candidate items efficiently. In our experiments with real data, we show this generative adversarial user model can better explain user behavior than alternatives, and the RL policy based on this model can lead to a better long-term reward for the user and higher click rate for the system.
Xinshi Chen, Shuang Li 0002, Hui Li 0061, Shaohua Jiang, Yuan Qi 0001
ICML1
2019 Particle Flow Bayes' Rule
abstract
We present a particle flow realization of Bayes’ rule, where an ODE-based neural operator is used to transport particles from a prior to its posterior after a new observation. We prove that such an ODE operator exists. Its neural parameterization can be trained in a meta-learning framework, allowing this operator to reason about the effect of an individual observation on the posterior, and thus generalize across different priors, observations and to sequential Bayesian inference. We demonstrated the generalization ability of our particle flow Bayes operator in several canonical and high dimensional examples.
Xinshi Chen, Hanjun Dai
ICML1