Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Diganta Misra
dblp:232/3344
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
7since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 2 first-author · 6 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Representation and self-supervised learning · 42% Trustworthy machine learning · 29% Generative modeling · 11% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 100% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 77% Software maintenance and evolution · 23% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Privacy and data protection · 100% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 17, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Using Shapley interactions to understand how models use structure · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
model stitching |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | (Almost) Free Modality Stitching of Foundation Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › multimodal representation learning
multimodal representation alignment |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | (Almost) Free Modality Stitching of Foundation Models · EMNLP 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › shapley value
shapley interaction |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Using Shapley interactions to understand how models use structure · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning
text embedding |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
cross-language information retrieval |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Information retrieval
retrieval models |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Slight Corruption in Pre-training Data Makes Better Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › data-centric deep learning
training data quality |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Slight Corruption in Pre-training Data Makes Better Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Privacy and data protection › privacy compliance
consent |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data Commons · NeurIPS 2024 |
Software maintenance and evolution › software compatibility
library version compatibility |
0.3 | 1 | 2026 | GitChameleon 2.0: Evaluating AI Code Generation Against Python Library Version Incompatibilities · ACL (1) 2026 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation analysis
embedding evaluation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
linguistic probing |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | Using Shapley interactions to understand how models use structure · ACL (1) 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Slight Corruption in Pre-training Data Makes Better Diffusion Models · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
hard negative sampling · 1.7benchmark downsampling · 1.7robots.txt analysis · 1.5longitudinal audit · 1.5retrieval-augmented generation · 1.0large language model · 1.0shapley value · 0.9interaction indices · 0.9hypernetwork · 0.9grid search · 0.9gaussian mixture model analysis · 0.82-wasserstein distance · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | GitChameleon 2.0: Evaluating AI Code Generation Against Python Library Version IncompatibilitiesabstractThe rapid evolution of software libraries poses a considerable hurdle for code generation, necessitating continuous adaptation to frequent version updates while preserving backward compatibility. While existing code evolution benchmarks provide valuable insights, they typically lack execution-based evaluation for generating code compliant with specific library versions. To address this, we introduce GitChameleon 2.0, a novel, meticulously curated dataset comprising 328 Python code completion problems, each conditioned on specific library versions and accompanied by executable unit tests. GitChameleon 2.0 rigorously evaluates the capacity of contemporary large language models (LLMs), LLM-powered agents, code assistants, and RAG systems to perform version-conditioned code generation that demonstrates functional accuracy through execution. Our extensive evaluations indicate that state-of-the-art systems encounter significant challenges with this task; enterprise models achieving baseline success rates in the 48-51% range, underscoring the intricacy of the problem. By offering an execution-based benchmark emphasizing the dynamic nature of code libraries, GitChameleon 2.0 enables a clearer understanding of this challenge and helps guide the development of more adaptable and dependable AI code generation methods. Diganta Misra, Nizar Islah, Victor May, Brice Rauby, Justine Gehring, Antonio Orvieto, Muawiz Chaudhary, Eilif B. Muller, Irina Rish, Samira Ebrahimi Kahou, Massimo Caccia |
ACL (1) | 1 |
| 2025 | Using Shapley interactions to understand how models use structureabstractDivyansh Singhvi, Diganta Misra, Andrej Erkelens, Raghav Jain, Isabel Papadimitriou, Naomi Saphra. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Divyansh Singhvi, Diganta Misra, Andrej Erkelens, Raghav Jain, Isabel Papadimitriou, Naomi Saphra |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | (Almost) Free Modality Stitching of Foundation ModelsabstractFoundation multi-modal models are often designed by stitching of multiple existing pretrained uni-modal models: for example, an image classifier with a text model.This stitching process is performed by training a connector module that aims to align the representation spaces of these uni-modal models towards a multi-modal objective.However, given the complexity of training such connectors on large scale web-based datasets coupled with the ever-increasing number of available pretrained uni-modal models, the task of unimodal models selection and subsequent connector module training becomes computationally demanding.To address this under-studied critical problem, we propose Hypernetwork Model Alignment (HYMA), a novel all-in-one solution for optimal uni-modal model selection and connector training by leveraging hypernetworks.Specifically, our framework utilizes the parameter prediction capability of a hypernetwork to obtain jointly trained connector modules for N × M combinations of uni-modal models.In our experiments, HYMA reduces the cost of searching for the best performing uni-modal model pair by 10×, while matching the ranking and trained connector performance obtained via grid search across a suite of diverse multi-modal benchmarks. Jaisidh Singh, Diganta Misra, Antonio Orvieto |
EMNLP | 2 |
| 2025 | MMTEB: Massive Multilingual Text Embedding BenchmarkabstractText embeddings are typically evaluated on a narrow set of tasks, limited in terms of languages, domains, and task types. To circumvent this limitation and to provide a more comprehensive evaluation, we introduce the Massive Multilingual Text Embedding Benchmark (MMTEB) -- a large-scale community-driven initiative expanding MTEB to over 500 quality-controlled evaluation tasks across 1,000+ languages. MMTEB includes a wide range of challenging novel tasks such as instruction following, long-document retrieval, and code retrieval, and represents the largest multilingual collection of evaluation tasks for embedding models to date. We use this collection to construct multiple highly multilingual benchmarks. We evaluate a representative set of models on these benchmarks.
Our findings indicate that, while LLM-based models can achieve state-of-the-art performance on a subset of languages, the best-performing publicly available model across languages is the notably smaller, multilingual-e5-large-instruct.
Massive benchmarks often impose high computational demands, limiting accessibility, particularly for low-resource communities. To address this, we downsample tasks based on inter-task correlation (i.e., selecting only a diverse set of tasks) while preserving relative rankings.
We further optimize tasks such as retrieval by sampling hard negatives, creating smaller but effective splits. These optimizations allow us to introduce benchmarks at a significantly lower computational cost. For instance, we introduce a new zero-shot English benchmark that maintains a similar ordering at a fraction of the cost. Kenneth C. Enevoldsen, Isaac Chung, Imene Kerboua, Márton Kardos, Ashwin Mathur, David Stap, Jay Gala, Wissam Siblini, Dominik Krzeminski, Genta Indra Winata, Saba Sturua, Saiteja Utpala, Mathieu Ciancone, Marion Schaeffer, Diganta Misra, Shreeya Dhakal, Jonathan Rystrøm, Roman Solomatin, Omer Veysel Cagatan, Akash Kundu |
ICLR | 15 |
| 2024 | Slight Corruption in Pre-training Data Makes Better Diffusion ModelsabstractDiffusion models (DMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in generating realistic high-quality images, audios, and videos.
They benefit significantly from extensive pre-training on large-scale datasets, including web-crawled data with paired data and conditions, such as image-text and image-class pairs.
Despite rigorous filtering, these pre-training datasets often inevitably contain corrupted pairs where conditions do not accurately describe the data.
This paper presents the first comprehensive study on the impact of such corruption in pre-training data of DMs.
We synthetically corrupt ImageNet-1K and CC3M to pre-train and evaluate over $50$ conditional DMs.
Our empirical findings reveal that various types of slight corruption in pre-training can significantly enhance the quality, diversity, and fidelity of the generated images across different DMs, both during pre-training and downstream adaptation stages.
Theoretically, we consider a Gaussian mixture model and prove that slight corruption in the condition leads to higher entropy and a reduced 2-Wasserstein distance to the ground truth of the data distribution generated by the corruptly trained DMs.
Inspired by our analysis, we propose a simple method to improve the training of DMs on practical datasets by adding condition embedding perturbations (CEP).
CEP significantly improves the performance of various DMs in both pre-training and downstream tasks.
We hope that our study provides new insights into understanding the data and pre-training processes of DMs. Hao Chen 0102, Yujin Han, Diganta Misra, Xiang Li 0106, Kai Hu 0010, Difan Zou, Masashi Sugiyama, Jindong Wang 0001, Bhiksha Raj |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Consent in Crisis: The Rapid Decline of the AI Data CommonsabstractGeneral-purpose artificial intelligence (AI) systems are built on massive swathes of public web data, assembled into corpora such as C4, RefinedWeb, and Dolma. To our knowledge, we conduct the first, large-scale, longitudinal audit of the consent protocols for the web domains underlying AI training corpora. Our audit of 14,000 web domains provides an expansive view of crawlable web data and how codified data use preferences are changing over time. We observe a proliferation of AI-specific clauses to limit use, acute differences in restrictions on AI developers, as well as general inconsistencies between websites' expressed intentions in their Terms of Service and their robots.txt. We diagnose these as symptoms of ineffective web protocols, not designed to cope with the widespread re-purposing of the internet for AI. Our longitudinal analyses show that in a single year (2023-2024) there has been a rapid crescendo of data restrictions from web sources, rendering ~5\%+ of all tokens in C4, or 28%+ of the most actively maintained, critical sources in C4, fully restricted from use. For Terms of Service crawling restrictions, a full 45% of C4 is now restricted. If respected or enforced, these restrictions are rapidly biasing the diversity, freshness, and scaling laws for general-purpose AI systems. We hope to illustrate the emerging crises in data consent, for both developers and creators. The foreclosure of much of the open web will impact not only commercial AI, but also non-commercial AI and academic research. Shayne Longpre, Robert Mahari, Ariel Lee, Campbell Lund, Hamidah Oderinwale, William Brannon, Nayan Saxena, Naana Obeng-Marnu, Tobin South, Cole Hunter, Kevin Klyman, Christopher Klamm, Hailey Schoelkopf, Nikhil Singh 0003, Manuel Cherep, Ahmad Anis, An Dinh, Caroline Shamiso Chitongo, Da Yin, Damien Sileo, Deividas Mataciunas, Diganta Misra, Emad A. Alghamdi, Enrico Shippole, Jianguo Zhang 0005, Joanna Materzynska, Kun Qian 0016, Kushagra Tiwary, Lester James V. Miranda, Manan Dey, Minnie Liang, Mohammed Hamdy, Niklas Muennighoff, Seonghyeon Ye, Seungone Kim, Shrestha Mohanty, Vivek Sharma 0001, Minh Chien Vu, Caiming Xiong, Stella Biderman, Daphne Ippolito, Sara Hooker, Jad Kabbara, Alex Pentland |
NeurIPS | 22 |
| 2021 | Rotate to Attend: Convolutional Triplet Attention ModuleabstractBenefiting from the capability of building interdependencies among channels or spatial locations, attention mechanisms have been extensively studied and broadly used in a variety of computer vision tasks recently. In this paper, we investigate light-weight but effective attention mechanisms and present triplet attention, a novel method for computing attention weights by capturing crossdimension interaction using a three-branch structure. For an input tensor, triplet attention builds inter-dimensional dependencies by the rotation operation followed by residual transformations and encodes inter-channel and spatial information with negligible computational overhead. Our method is simple as well as efficient and can be easily plugged into classic backbone networks as an add-on module. We demonstrate the effectiveness of our method on various challenging tasks including image classification on ImageNet-1k and object detection on MSCOCO and PASCAL VOC datasets. Furthermore, we provide extensive insight into the performance of triplet attention by visually inspecting the GradCAM and GradCAM++ results. The empirical evaluation of our method supports our intuition on the importance of capturing dependencies across dimensions when computing attention weights. Code for this paper can be publicly accessed at https://github.com/LandskapeAI/triplet-attention. Diganta Misra, Trikay Nalamada, Ajay Uppili Arasanipalai, Qibin Hou |
WACV | 1 |
| 2020 | Mish: A Self Regularized Non-Monotonic Activation Function
Diganta Misra |
BMVC | 1 |