VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ayoub Belhadji
dblp:232/3974
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 5 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Theoretical computer science
5 papers |
Mathematical optimization · 41% Algorithms and data structures · 34% Information theory · 24% | |
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 59% Kernel, tree and ensemble methods · 21% Learning theory · 21% |
Topics — the 16 heaviest of 16, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › stochastic processes › point process
determinantal point process |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | An analysis of Ermakov-Zolotukhin quadrature using kernels · NeurIPS 2021 Kernel quadrature with DPPs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis › numerical integration › quadrature rules
kernel quadrature |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | An analysis of Ermakov-Zolotukhin quadrature using kernels · NeurIPS 2021 Kernel quadrature with DPPs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis
numerical integration |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | An analysis of Ermakov-Zolotukhin quadrature using kernels · NeurIPS 2021 Kernel quadrature with DPPs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Mathematical optimization › numerical analysis › numerical integration
quadrature rules |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | An analysis of Ermakov-Zolotukhin quadrature using kernels · NeurIPS 2021 Kernel quadrature with DPPs · NeurIPS 2019 |
Information theory › signal processing
compressed sensing |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Revisiting RIP Guarantees for Sketching Operators on Mixture Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Information theory › signal processing › compressed sensing
restricted isometry property |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Revisiting RIP Guarantees for Sketching Operators on Mixture Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › nonparametric regression › kernel regression
kernel interpolation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Kernel interpolation with continuous volume sampling · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Kernel, tree and ensemble methods
kernel methods |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Kernel interpolation with continuous volume sampling · ICML 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › matrix approximation
column subset selection |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A determinantal point process for column subset selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling
determinantal point process |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A determinantal point process for column subset selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › numerical linear algebra
dimensionality reduction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | A determinantal point process for column subset selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms
sampling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Kernel interpolation with continuous volume sampling · ICML 2020 |
Algorithms and data structures › randomized algorithms › sampling › determinantal point process
volume sampling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | Kernel interpolation with continuous volume sampling · ICML 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › structured models › latent variable model
mixture model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Revisiting RIP Guarantees for Sketching Operators on Mixture Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
kernel density estimation |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | Kernel interpolation with continuous volume sampling · ICML 2020 |
Approximation and online algorithms
approximation algorithms |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | A determinantal point process for column subset selection · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
determinantal point process · 3.1random fourier features · 1.5concentration inequalities · 1.5kernel methods · 1.0MCMC sampling · 0.9herding · 0.8bayesian quadrature · 0.8volume sampling · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Revisiting RIP Guarantees for Sketching Operators on Mixture ModelsabstractIn the context of sketching for compressive mixture modeling, we revisit existing proofs of the Restricted Isometry Property of sketching operators with respect to certain mixtures models. After examining the shortcomings of existing guarantees, we propose an alternative analysis that circumvents the need to assume importance sampling when drawing random Fourier features to build random sketching operators. Our analysis is based on new deterministic bounds on the restricted isometry constant that depend solely on the set of frequencies used to define the sketching operator; then we leverage these bounds to establish concentration inequalities for random sketching operators that lead to the desired RIP guarantees. Our analysis also opens the door to theoretical guarantees for structured sketching with frequencies associated to fast random linear operators. Ayoub Belhadji, Rémi Gribonval |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2021 | An analysis of Ermakov-Zolotukhin quadrature using kernelsabstractWe study a quadrature, proposed by Ermakov and Zolotukhin in the sixties, through the lens of kernel methods. The nodes of this quadrature rule follow the distribution of a determinantal point process, while the weights are defined through a linear system, similarly to the optimal kernel quadrature. In this work, we show how these two classes of quadrature are related, and we prove a tractable formula of the expected value of the squared worst-case integration error on the unit ball of an RKHS of the former quadrature. In particular, this formula involves the eigenvalues of the corresponding kernel and leads to improving on the existing theoretical guarantees of the optimal kernel quadrature with determinantal point processes. Ayoub Belhadji |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | Kernel interpolation with continuous volume samplingabstractA fundamental task in kernel methods is to pick nodes and weights, so as to approximate a given function from an RKHS by the weighted sum of kernel translates located at the nodes. This is the crux of kernel density estimation, kernel quadrature, or interpolation from discrete samples. Furthermore, RKHSs offer a convenient mathematical and computational framework. We introduce and analyse continuous volume sampling (VS), the continuous counterpart -for choosing node locations- of a discrete distribution introduced in (Deshpande & Vempala, 2006). Our contribution is theoretical: we prove almost optimal bounds for interpolation and quadrature under VS. While similar bounds already exist for some specific RKHSs using ad-hoc node constructions, VS offers bounds that apply to any Mercer kernel and depend on the spectrum of the associated integration operator. We emphasize that, unlike previous randomized approaches that rely on regularized leverage scores or determinantal point processes, evaluating the pdf of VS only requires pointwise evaluations of the kernel. VS is thus naturally amenable to MCMC samplers. Ayoub Belhadji, Rémi Bardenet, Pierre Chainais |
ICML | 1 |
| 2020 | A determinantal point process for column subset selectionabstractTwo popular approaches to dimensionality reduction are principal component analysis, which projects onto a small number of well-chosen but non-interpretable directions, and feature selection, which selects a small number of the original features. Feature selection can be abstracted as selecting the subset of columns of a matrix $X \in \mathbb{R}^{N \times d}$ which minimize the approximation error, i.e., the norm of the residual after projecting $X$ onto the space spanned by the selected columns. Such a combinatorial optimization is usually impractical, and there has been interest in polynomial-cost, random subset selection algorithms that favour small values of this approximation error. We propose sampling from a projection determinantal point process, a repulsive distribution over column indices that favours diversity among the selected columns. We bound the ratio of the expected approximation error over the optimal error of PCA. These bounds improve over the state-of-the-art bounds of volume sampling when some realistic structural assumptions are satisfied for $X$. Numerical experiments suggest that our bounds are tight, and that our algorithms have comparable performance with the double phase algorithm, often considered the practical state-of-the-art. Ayoub Belhadji, Rémi Bardenet, Pierre Chainais |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |
| 2019 | Kernel quadrature with DPPsabstractWe study quadrature rules for functions living in an RKHS, using nodes sampled from a projection determinantal point process (DPP). DPPs are parametrized by a kernel, and we use a truncated and saturated version of the RKHS kernel. This natural link between the two kernels, along with DPP machinery, leads to relatively tight bounds on the quadrature error, that depends on the spectrum of the RKHS kernel. Finally, we experimentally compare DPPs to existing kernel-based quadratures such as herding, Bayesian quadrature, or continuous leverage score sampling. Numerical results confirm the interest of DPPs, and even suggest faster rates than our bounds in particular cases. Ayoub Belhadji, Rémi Bardenet, Pierre Chainais |
NeurIPS | 1 |