Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Ilsang Ohn
dblp:232/4202
· DBLP profile ↗
9ranked-venue papers
1as first author
9since 2021 · last 2026
0000-0003-3953-5953ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 9 · 1 first-author · 9 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Trustworthy machine learning · 37% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 21% Learning theory · 18% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
diffusion model |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Nonparametric Estimation of a Factorizable Density using Diffusion Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory › statistical estimation › minimax estimation
minimax rates |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Nonparametric Estimation of a Factorizable Density using Diffusion Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
nonparametric density estimation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Nonparametric Estimation of a Factorizable Density using Diffusion Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Learning theory
statistical estimation |
1.0 | 1 | 2026 | Nonparametric Estimation of a Factorizable Density using Diffusion Models · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2026 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › model compression
knowledge distillation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Knowledge Distillation of Uncertainty using Deep Latent Factor Model · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Knowledge Distillation of Uncertainty using Deep Latent Factor Model · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Knowledge Distillation of Uncertainty using Deep Latent Factor Model · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness
learning with noisy labels |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | IOFM: Using the Interpolation Technique on the Over-Fitted Models to Identify Clean-Annotated Samples · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › learning with noisy labels
memorization effect |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | IOFM: Using the Interpolation Technique on the Over-Fitted Models to Identify Clean-Annotated Samples · AAAI 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › deep probabilistic models › bayesian deep learning
bayesian neural networks |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Masked Bayesian Neural Networks : Theoretical Guarantee and its Posterior Inference · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › bayesian inference › bayesian asymptotics
posterior concentration |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Masked Bayesian Neural Networks : Theoretical Guarantee and its Posterior Inference · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness › adversarial robustness
adversarial training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning fair representation with a parametric integral probability metric · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning fair representation with a parametric integral probability metric · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fair representation learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Learning fair representation with a parametric integral probability metric · ICML 2022 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparse weight-sharing neural network · 1.0score-based generative model · 1.0diffusion model · 1.0gaussian process · 0.9expectation-maximization · 0.9deep latent factor model · 0.9over-fitted deep neural network · 0.8interpolation · 0.8fine-tuning · 0.8markov chain monte carlo · 0.7
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2026 | Nonparametric Estimation of a Factorizable Density using Diffusion ModelsabstractIn recent years, diffusion models, and more generally score-based deep generative models, have achieved remarkable success in various applications, including image and audio generation. In this paper, we view diffusion models as an implicit approach to nonparametric density estimation and study them within a statistical framework to analyze their surprising performance. A key challenge in high-dimensional statistical inference is leveraging low-dimensional structures inherent in the data to mitigate the curse of dimensionality. We assume that the underlying density exhibits a low-dimensional structure by factorizing into low-dimensional components, a property common in examples such as Bayesian networks and Markov random fields. Under suitable assumptions, we demonstrate that an implicit density estimator constructed from diffusion models adapts to the factorization structure and achieves the minimax optimal rate with respect to the total variation distance. In constructing the estimator, we design a sparse weight-sharing neural network architecture, where sparsity and weight-sharing are key features of practical architectures such as convolutional neural networks and recurrent neural networks. Hyeok Kyu Kwon, Ilsang Ohn, Minwoo Chae |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |
| 2026 | Online conformal inference with retrospective adjustment for faster adaptation to distribution shift
Jungbin Jun, Ilsang Ohn |
Pattern Recognit. | 2 |
| 2025 | Knowledge Distillation of Uncertainty using Deep Latent Factor ModelabstractDeep ensembles deliver state-of-the-art, reliable uncertainty quantification, but their heavy computational and memory requirements hinder their practical deployments to real applications such as on-device AI. Knowledge distillation compresses an ensemble into small student models, but existing techniques struggle to preserve uncertainty partly because reducing the size of DNNs typically results in variation reduction. To resolve this limitation, we introduce a new method of distribution distillation (i.e. compressing a teacher ensemble into a student distribution instead of a student ensemble) called Gaussian distillation, which estimates the distribution of a teacher ensemble through a special Gaussian process called the deep latent factor model (DLF) by treating each member of the teacher ensemble as a realization of a certain stochastic process. The mean and covariance functions in the DLF model are estimated stably by using the expectation-maximization (EM) algorithm. By using multiple benchmark datasets, we demonstrate that the proposed Gaussian distillation outperforms existing baselines. In addition, we illustrate that Gaussian distillation works well for fine-tuning of language models and distribution shift problems. Sehyun Park, Jongjin Lee, Yunseop Shin, Ilsang Ohn, Yongdai Kim |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2024 | IOFM: Using the Interpolation Technique on the Over-Fitted Models to Identify Clean-Annotated SamplesabstractMost recent state-of-the-art algorithms for handling noisy label problems are based on the memorization effect, which is a phenomenon that deep neural networks (DNNs) memorize clean data before noisy ones. While the memorization effect can be a powerful tool, there are several cases where memorization effect does not occur. Examples are imbalanced class distributions and heavy contamination on labels. To address this limitation, we introduce a whole new approach called the interpolation with the over-fitted model (IOFM), which leverages over-fitted deep neural networks. The IOFM utilizes a new finding of over-fitted DNNs: for a given training sample, its neighborhoods chosen from the feature space are distributed differently on the original input space depending on the cleanness of the target sample. The IOFM has notable features in two aspects: 1) it yields superior results even when the training data are imbalanced or heavily noisy, 2) since we utilize over-fitted deep neural networks, a fine-tuning procedure to select the optimal training epoch, which is an essential yet sensitive factor for the success of the memorization effect, is not required, and thus, the IOFM can be used for non-experts. Through extensive experiments, we show that our method can serve as a promising alternative to existing solutions dealing with noisy labels, offering improved performance even in challenging situations. Yongchan Choi, Kunwoong Kim, Ilsang Ohn, Yongdai Kim |
AAAI | 4 |
| 2023 | Masked Bayesian Neural Networks : Theoretical Guarantee and its Posterior InferenceabstractBayesian approaches for learning deep neural networks (BNN) have been received much attention and successfully applied to various applications. Particularly, BNNs have the merit of having better generalization ability as well as better uncertainty quantification. For the success of BNN, search an appropriate architecture of the neural networks is an important task, and various algorithms to find good sparse neural networks have been proposed. In this paper, we propose a new node-sparse BNN model which has good theoretical properties and is computationally feasible. We prove that the posterior concentration rate to the true model is near minimax optimal and adaptive to the smoothness of the true model. In particular the adaptiveness is the first of its kind for node-sparse BNNs. In addition, we develop a novel MCMC algorithm which makes the Bayesian inference of the node-sparse BNN model feasible in practice. Insung Kong, Dongyoon Yang, Jongjin Lee, Ilsang Ohn, Gyuseung Baek, Yongdai Kim |
ICML | 4 |
| 2022 | Learning fair representation with a parametric integral probability metricabstractAs they have a vital effect on social decision-making, AI algorithms should be not only accurate but also fair. Among various algorithms for fairness AI, learning fair representation (LFR), whose goal is to find a fair representation with respect to sensitive variables such as gender and race, has received much attention. For LFR, the adversarial training scheme is popularly employed as is done in the generative adversarial network type algorithms. The choice of a discriminator, however, is done heuristically without justification. In this paper, we propose a new adversarial training scheme for LFR, where the integral probability metric (IPM) with a specific parametric family of discriminators is used. The most notable result of the proposed LFR algorithm is its theoretical guarantee about the fairness of the final prediction model, which has not been considered yet. That is, we derive theoretical relations between the fairness of representation and the fairness of the prediction model built on the top of the representation (i.e., using the representation as the input). Moreover, by numerical experiments, we show that our proposed LFR algorithm is computationally lighter and more stable, and the final prediction model is competitive or superior to other LFR algorithms using more complex discriminators. Kunwoong Kim, Insung Kong, Ilsang Ohn, Yongdai Kim |
ICML | 4 |
| 2022 | Nonconvex Sparse Regularization for Deep Neural Networks and Its OptimalityabstractRecent theoretical studies proved that deep neural network (DNN) estimators obtained by minimizing empirical risk with a certain sparsity constraint can attain optimal convergence rates for regression and classification problems. However, the sparsity constraint requires knowing certain properties of the true model, which are not available in practice. Moreover, computation is difficult due to the discrete nature of the sparsity constraint. In this letter, we propose a novel penalized estimation method for sparse DNNs that resolves the problems existing in the sparsity constraint. We establish an oracle inequality for the excess risk of the proposed sparse-penalized DNN estimator and derive convergence rates for several learning tasks. In particular, we prove that the sparse-penalized estimator can adaptively attain minimax convergence rates for various nonparametric regression problems. For computation, we develop an efficient gradient-based optimization algorithm that guarantees the monotonic reduction of the objective function. Ilsang Ohn, Yongdai Kim |
Neural Comput. | 1 |
| 2022 | SLIDE: A surrogate fairness constraint to ensure fairness consistency
Kunwoong Kim, Ilsang Ohn, Sara Kim, Yongdai Kim |
Neural Networks | 2 |
| 2021 | Fast convergence rates of deep neural networks for classificationabstractWe derive the fast convergence rates of a deep neural network (DNN) classifier with the rectified linear unit (ReLU) activation function learned using the hinge loss. We consider three cases for a true model: (1) a smooth decision boundary, (2) smooth conditional class probability, and (3) the margin condition (i.e., the probability of inputs near the decision boundary is small). We show that the DNN classifier learned using the hinge loss achieves fast rate convergences for all three cases provided that the architecture (i.e., the number of layers, number of nodes and sparsity) is carefully selected. An important implication is that DNN architectures are very flexible for use in various cases without much modification. In addition, we consider a DNN classifier learned by minimizing the cross-entropy, and show that the DNN classifier achieves a fast convergence rate under the conditions that the noise exponent and margin exponent are large. Even though they are strong, we explain that these two conditions are not too absurd for image classification problems. To confirm our theoretical explanation, we present the results of a small numerical study conducted to compare the hinge loss and cross-entropy. Yongdai Kim, Ilsang Ohn |
Neural Networks | 2 |