Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Steven Farrell
dblp:232/5634
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1854-4113ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 87% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 13% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper |
High-performance computing · 56% Performance modeling and evaluation · 44% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Computational science and engineering · 100% |
Topics — the 6 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › confidence estimation
confidence interval estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Computational science and engineering
high energy physics |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
Performance modeling and evaluation › analytical modeling
roofline model |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Workflow Roofline Model for End-to-End Workflow Performance Analysis · SC 2024 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › statistical inference › density estimation
density ratio estimation |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and Competition · NeurIPS 2025 |
High-performance computing
performance optimization at scale |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Workflow Roofline Model for End-to-End Workflow Performance Analysis · SC 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
density ratio estimation · 1.7contrastive normalizing flows · 1.7roofline modeling · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | FAIR Universe HiggsML Uncertainty Dataset and CompetitionabstractThe FAIR Universe – HiggsML Uncertainty Challenge focused on measuring the physical properties of elementary particles with imperfect simulators. Participants were required to compute and report confidence intervals for a parameter of interest regarding the Higgs boson while accounting for various systematic (epistemic) uncertainties. The dataset is a tabular dataset of 28 features and 280 million instances. Each instance represents a simulated proton-proton collision as observed at CERN’s Large Hadron Collider in Geneva, Switzerland. The features of these simulations were chosen to capture key characteristics of different types of particles. These include primary attributes, such as the energy and three-dimensional momentum of the particles, as well as derived attributes, which are calculated from the primary ones using domain-specific knowledge. Additionally, a label feature designates each instance’s type of proton-proton collision, distinguishing the Higgs boson events of interest from three background sources. As outlined in this paper, the permanent dataset release allows long-term benchmarking of new techniques. The leading submissions, including Contrastive Normalising Flows and Density Ratios estimation through classification, are described. Our challenge has brought together the physics and machine learning communities to advance our understanding and methodologies in handling systematic uncertainties within AI techniques. Wahid Bhimji, Ragansu Chakkappai, Po-Wen Chang, Yuan-Tang Chou, Sascha Diefenbacher, Jordan Dudley, Ibrahim Elsharkawy, Steven Farrell, Aishik Ghosh, Cristina Giordano, Isabelle Guyon, Christopher J. Harris 0004, Yota Hashizume, Shih-Chieh Hsu, Elham E Khoda, Claudius Krause, Benjamin Nachman, David Rousseau, Robert Schöfbeck, Maryam Shooshtari, Dennis Schwarz, Daohan Wang |
NeurIPS | 8 |
| 2024 | A Workflow Roofline Model for End-to-End Workflow Performance AnalysisabstractAs next-generation experimental and observational instruments for scientific research are being deployed with higher resolutions and faster data capture rates, the fundamental demands of producing high-quality scientific throughput require portability and performance to meet the high productivity goals. Understanding such a workflow’s end-to-end performance on HPC systems is formidable work. In this paper, we address this challenge by introducing a Workflow Roofline model, which ties a workflow’s end-to-end performance with peak node- and system-performance constraints. We analyze four workflows: LCLS, a time-sensitive workflow that is bound by system external bandwidth; BerkeleyGW, a traditional HPC workflow that is bound by node-local performance; CosmoFlow, an AI workflow that is bound by the CPU preprocessing; and GPTune, an auto tuner that is bound by the data control flow. We demonstrate the ability of our methodology to understand various aspects of performance and performance bottlenecks on workflows and systems and motivate workflow optimizations. Nan Ding 0006, Brian Austin, Yang Liu 0179, Neil Mehta, Steven Farrell, Johannes P. Blaschke, Leonid Oliker, Hai Ah Nam, Nicholas J. Wright, Samuel Williams 0001 |
SC | 5 |
| 2018 | TrackML: A High Energy Physics Particle Tracking ChallengeabstractTo attain its ultimate discovery goals, the luminosity of the Large Hadron Collider at CERN will increase so the amount of additional collisions will reach a level of 200 interaction per bunch crossing, a factor 7 w.r.t the current (2017) luminosity. This will be a challenge for the ATLAS and CMS experiments, in particular for track reconstruction algorithms. In terms of software, the increased combinatorial complexity will have to harnessed without any increase in budget. To engage the Computer Science community to contribute new ideas, we organized a Tracking Machine Learning challenge (TrackML) running on the Kaggle platform from March to June 2018, building on the experience of the successful Higgs Machine Learning challenge in 2014. The data were generated using [ACTS], an open source accurate tracking simulator, featuring a typical all silicon LHC tracking detector, with 10 layers of cylinders and disks. Simulated physics events (Pythia ttbar) overlaid with 200 additional collisions yield typically 10000 tracks (100000 hits) per event. The first lessons from the Accuracy phase of the challenge will be discussed. Paolo Calafiura, Steven Farrell, Heather M. Gray, Jean-Roch Vlimant, Vincenzo Innocente, Andreas Salzburger, Sabrina Amrouche, Tobias Golling, Moritz Kiehn, Victor Estrade, Cécile Germain, Isabelle Guyon, Edward Moyse, David Rousseau, Yetkin Yilmaz, Vladimir V. Gligorov, Mikhail Hushchyn, Andrey Ustyuzhanin |
eScience | 2 |