Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Simon Duenser

dblp:233/0365 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
3since 2021 · last 2023
0000-0003-2138-4683ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 4 · 2 first-author · 3 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Computer animation and physical simulation · 50% Geometric modeling and processing · 30% Computational fabrication · 20%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Computer animation and physical simulation
deformable body simulation
0.712023
Nonlinear Compliant Modes for Large-deformation Analysis of Flexible Structures · ACM Trans. Graph. 2023
Computer animation and physical simulation › deformable body simulation
elastic rod simulation
0.412020
RoboCut: hot-wire cutting with robot-controlled flexible rods · ACM Trans. Graph. 2020
Computational fabrication › computer-aided manufacturing
robotic fabrication
0.412020
RoboCut: hot-wire cutting with robot-controlled flexible rods · ACM Trans. Graph. 2020
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › trajectory planning
collision-free trajectory generation
0.112020
RoboCut: hot-wire cutting with robot-controlled flexible rods · ACM Trans. Graph. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

trajectory optimization · 0.9elastic rod modeling · 0.9energy minimization · 0.7eigenanalysis · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2023 Nonlinear Compliant Modes for Large-deformation Analysis of Flexible Structures
abstract
Many flexible structures are characterized by a small number of compliant modes , i.e., large-deformation paths that can be traversed with little mechanical effort, whereas resistance to other deformations is much stiffer. Predicting the compliant modes for a given flexible structure, however, is challenging. While linear eigenmodes capture the small-deformation behavior, they quickly divert into states of unrealistically high energy for larger displacements. Moreover, they are inherently unable to predict nonlinear phenomena such as buckling, stiffening, multistability, and contact. To address this limitation, we propose Nonlinear Compliant Modes —a physically principled extension of linear eigenmodes for large-deformation analysis. Instead of constraining the entire structure to deform along a given eigenmode, our method only prescribes the projection of the system’s state onto the linear mode while all other degrees of freedom follow through energy minimization. We evaluate the potential of our method on a diverse set of flexible structures, ranging from compliant mechanisms to topology-optimized joints and structured materials. As validated through experiments on physical prototypes, our method correctly predicts a broad range of nonlinear effects that linear eigenanalysis fails to capture.
Simon Duenser, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Roi Poranne, Stelian Coros
ACM Trans. Graph.1
2022 Erratum to "Stylized robotic clay sculpting" [Comput. Graph. 98 (2021) 150-164]
Zhao Ma, Simon Duenser, Romana Rust, Moritz Bächer, Fabio Gramazio, Matthias Kohler, Stelian Coros
Comput. Graph.2
2021 Stylized robotic clay sculpting
abstract
This paper presents an interactive design system that allows the user to create and fabricate stylized sculptures in water-based clay, using a standard 6-axis robot arm. This system facilitates the materialization of abstract design intentions into clay, through the algorithmic formulation of sculpting styles, the optimal path planning of the sculpting toolpaths, and a subtractive robotic fabrication process using customized tools. Unlike other precision-driven fabrication technologies, the authors embrace artistic uncertainty by conducting manual and robotic sculpting experiments and incorporating prominent parameters that affect the fabrication quality. The versatility of the described approach is demonstrated by designing a series of sculpting styles over a wide range of 3D models and robotically fabricating them in clay. Additionally, the paper explores various strategies for designing stylized robotic sculpting patterns by generating toolpaths informed by different techniques.
Zhao Ma, Simon Duenser, Romana Rust, Moritz Bächer, Fabio Gramazio, Matthias Kohler, Stelian Coros
Comput. Graph.2
2020 RoboCut: hot-wire cutting with robot-controlled flexible rods
abstract
Hot-wire cutting is a subtractive fabrication technique used to carve foam and similar materials. Conventional machines rely on straight wires and are thus limited to creating piecewise ruled surfaces. In this work, we propose a method that exploits a dual-arm robot setup to actively control the shape of a flexible, heated rod as it cuts through the material. While this setting offers great freedom of shape, using it effectively requires concurrent reasoning about three tightly coupled sub-problems: 1) modeling the way in which the shape of the rod and the surface it sweeps are governed by the robot's motions; 2) approximating a target shape through a sequence of surfaces swept by the equilibrium shape of an elastic rod; and 3) generating collision-free motion trajectories that lead the robot to create desired sweeps with the deformable tool. We present a computational framework for robotic hot wire cutting that addresses all three sub-problems in a unified manner. We evaluate our approach on a set of simulated results and physical artefacts generated with our robotic fabrication system.
Simon Duenser, Roi Poranne, Bernhard Thomaszewski, Stelian Coros
ACM Trans. Graph.1
2018 Interactive Robotic Manipulation of Elastic Objects
abstract
In this paper, we address the challenge of robotic manipulation of elastically deforming objects. To this end, we model elastic objects using the Finite Element Method. Through a quasi-static assumption, we leverage sensitivity analysis to mathematically model how changes in the robot's configuration affect the deformed shape of the object being manipulated. This enables an interactive, simulation-based control methodology, wherein user-specified deformations for the elastic objects are automatically mapped to joint angle commands. The optimization formulation we introduce is general, operates directly within a robot's workspace and can readily incorporate joint limits as well as collision avoidance between the links. We validate our control methodology on a YuMi® IRB 14000, which we use to manipulate a variety of elastic objects.
Simon Duenser, James M. Bern, Roi Poranne, Stelian Coros
IROS1