Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Benjamin Elder
dblp:234/7511
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · unresolved
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 67% Efficient and distributed learning · 33% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › automated machine learning
model performance prediction |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Prediction Intervals for Model Performance · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation
prediction intervals |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Prediction Intervals for Model Performance · AAAI 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Learning Prediction Intervals for Model Performance · AAAI 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transfer learning · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Learning Prediction Intervals for Model PerformanceabstractUnderstanding model performance on unlabeled data is a fundamental challenge of developing, deploying, and maintaining AI systems. Model performance is typically evaluated using test sets or periodic manual quality assessments, both of which require laborious manual data labeling. Automated performance prediction techniques aim to mitigate this burden, but potential inaccuracy and a lack of trust in their predictions has prevented their widespread adoption. We address this core problem of performance prediction uncertainty with a method to compute prediction intervals for model performance. Our methodology uses transfer learning to train an uncertainty model to estimate the uncertainty of model performance predictions. We evaluate our approach across a wide range of drift conditions and show substantial improvement over competitive baselines. We believe this result makes prediction intervals, and performance prediction in general, significantly more practical for real-world use. Benjamin Elder, Matthew Arnold, Anupama Murthi, Jirí Navrátil 0001 |
AAAI | 1 |