Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Manash Pratim Barman

dblp:234/7619 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0002-2235-5457ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Trustworthy machine learning · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Computational social science and digital humanities · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness › bias evaluation
bias measurement
0.412019
Decoding The Style And Bias of Song Lyrics · SIGIR 2019
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness
0.412019
Decoding The Style And Bias of Song Lyrics · SIGIR 2019
Information retrieval
text analysis
0.112019
Decoding The Style And Bias of Song Lyrics · SIGIR 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

WEAT · 1.1distributed representation · 0.8distributed representations · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 It's only Words and Words Are All I Have
Manash Pratim Barman, Kavish Dahekar, Abhinav Anshuman, Amit Awekar
ECIR (2)1
2019 Decoding The Style And Bias of Song Lyrics
abstract
The central idea of this paper is to gain a deeper understanding of song lyrics computationally. We focus on two aspects: style and biases of song lyrics. All prior works to understand these two aspects are limited to manual analysis of a small corpus of song lyrics. In contrast, we analyzed more than half a million songs spread over five decades. We characterize the lyrics style in terms of vocabulary, length, repetitiveness, speed, and readability. We have observed that the style of popular songs significantly differs from other songs. We have used distributed representation methods and WEAT test to measure various gender and racial biases in the song lyrics. We have observed that biases in song lyrics correlate with prior results on human subjects. This correlation indicates that song lyrics reflect the biases that exist in society. Increasing consumption of music and the effect of lyrics on human emotions makes this analysis important.
Manash Pratim Barman, Amit Awekar, Sambhav Kothari
SIGIR1