Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhenxun Zhuang
dblp:234/8537
· DBLP profile ↗
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
3since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
4 papers |
Optimization for machine learning · 72% Efficient and distributed learning · 18% Learning theory · 8% | |
| Theoretical computer science
1 paper |
Mathematical optimization · 100% |
Topics — the 13 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic optimization
adaptive gradient methods |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGD · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
communication-efficient training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Communication-Efficient Distributed Gradient Clipping Algorithm for Training Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Communication-Efficient Distributed Gradient Clipping Algorithm for Training Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
gradient clipping |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | A Communication-Efficient Distributed Gradient Clipping Algorithm for Training Deep Neural Networks · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
non-convex optimization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGD · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient descent
signSGD |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGD · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
unbounded smoothness |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGD · NeurIPS 2022 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › stochastic gradient descent
step size schedule |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Second look at Exponential and Cosine Step Sizes: Simplicity, Adaptivity, and Performance · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning
stochastic gradient descent |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | A Second look at Exponential and Cosine Step Sizes: Simplicity, Adaptivity, and Performance · ICML 2021 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › adaptive optimization
adaptive learning rate |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Surrogate Losses for Online Learning of Stepsizes in Stochastic Non-Convex Optimization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Optimization for machine learning › non-convex optimization
non-convex stochastic optimization |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Surrogate Losses for Online Learning of Stepsizes in Stochastic Non-Convex Optimization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › recurrent neural network
recurrent neural network training |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGD · NeurIPS 2022 |
Mathematical optimization › online optimization
online convex optimization |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Surrogate Losses for Online Learning of Stepsizes in Stochastic Non-Convex Optimization · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic gradient descent · 1.3gradient clipping · 1.1surrogate loss · 0.8no-regret online learning · 0.8relaxed-smoothness assumption · 0.6momentum · 0.6adam · 0.6polyak-lojasiewicz condition · 0.5exponential step size · 0.5cosine step size · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Robustness to Unbounded Smoothness of Generalized SignSGDabstractTraditional analyses in non-convex optimization typically rely on the smoothness assumption, namely requiring the gradients to be Lipschitz. However, recent evidence shows that this smoothness condition does not capture the properties of some deep learning objective functions, including the ones involving Recurrent Neural Networks and LSTMs. Instead, they satisfy a much more relaxed condition, with potentially unbounded smoothness. Under this relaxed assumption, it has been theoretically and empirically shown that the gradient-clipped SGD has an advantage over the vanilla one. In this paper, we show that clipping is not indispensable for Adam-type algorithms in tackling such scenarios: we theoretically prove that a generalized SignSGD algorithm can obtain similar convergence rates as SGD with clipping but does not need explicit clipping at all. This family of algorithms on one end recovers SignSGD and on the other end closely resembles the popular Adam algorithm. Our analysis underlines the critical role that momentum plays in analyzing SignSGD-type and Adam-type algorithms: it not only reduces the effects of noise, thus removing the need for large mini-batch in previous analyses of SignSGD-type algorithms, but it also substantially reduces the effects of unbounded smoothness and gradient norms. To the best of our knowledge, this work is the first one showing the benefit of Adam-type algorithms compared with non-adaptive gradient algorithms such as gradient descent in the unbounded smoothness setting. We also compare these algorithms with popular optimizers on a set of deep learning tasks, observing that we can match the performance of Adam while beating others. Michael Crawshaw, Francesco Orabona, Wei Zhang 0022, Zhenxun Zhuang |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2022 | A Communication-Efficient Distributed Gradient Clipping Algorithm for Training Deep Neural NetworksabstractIn distributed training of deep neural networks, people usually run Stochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) or its variants on each machine and communicate with other machines periodically. However, SGD might converge slowly in training some deep neural networks (e.g., RNN, LSTM) because of the exploding gradient issue. Gradient clipping is usually employed to address this issue in the single machine setting, but exploring this technique in the distributed setting is still in its infancy: it remains mysterious whether the gradient clipping scheme can take advantage of multiple machines to enjoy parallel speedup. The main technical difficulty lies in dealing with nonconvex loss function, non-Lipschitz continuous gradient, and skipping communication rounds simultaneously. In this paper, we explore a relaxed-smoothness assumption of the loss landscape which LSTM was shown to satisfy in previous works, and design a communication-efficient gradient clipping algorithm. This algorithm can be run on multiple machines, where each machine employs a gradient clipping scheme and communicate with other machines after multiple steps of gradient-based updates. Our algorithm is proved to have $O\left(\frac{1}{N\epsilon^4}\right)$ iteration complexity and $O(\frac{1}{\epsilon^3})$ communication complexity for finding an $\epsilon$-stationary point in the homogeneous data setting, where $N$ is the number of machines. This indicates that our algorithm enjoys linear speedup and reduced communication rounds. Our proof relies on novel analysis techniques of estimating truncated random variables, which we believe are of independent interest. Our experiments on several benchmark datasets and various scenarios demonstrate that our algorithm indeed exhibits fast convergence speed in practice and thus validates our theory. Zhenxun Zhuang, Yunwen Lei, Chunyang Liao |
NeurIPS | 2 |
| 2021 | A Second look at Exponential and Cosine Step Sizes: Simplicity, Adaptivity, and PerformanceabstractStochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) is a popular tool in training large-scale machine learning models. Its performance, however, is highly variable, depending crucially on the choice of the step sizes. Accordingly, a variety of strategies for tuning the step sizes have been proposed, ranging from coordinate-wise approaches (a.k.a. “adaptive” step sizes) to sophisticated heuristics to change the step size in each iteration. In this paper, we study two step size schedules whose power has been repeatedly confirmed in practice: the exponential and the cosine step sizes. For the first time, we provide theoretical support for them proving convergence rates for smooth non-convex functions, with and without the Polyak-Ł{}ojasiewicz (PL) condition. Moreover, we show the surprising property that these two strategies are \emph{adaptive} to the noise level in the stochastic gradients of PL functions. That is, contrary to polynomial step sizes, they achieve almost optimal performance without needing to know the noise level nor tuning their hyperparameters based on it. Finally, we conduct a fair and comprehensive empirical evaluation of real-world datasets with deep learning architectures. Results show that, even if only requiring at most two hyperparameters to tune, these two strategies best or match the performance of various finely-tuned state-of-the-art strategies. Zhenxun Zhuang, Francesco Orabona |
ICML | 2 |
| 2020 | No-Regret Non-Convex Online Meta-LearningabstractThe online meta-learning framework is designed for the continual lifelong learning setting. It bridges two fields: meta-learning which tries to extract prior knowledge from past tasks for fast learning of future tasks, and online-learning which tackles the sequential setting where problems are revealed one by one. In this paper, we generalize the original framework from convex to non-convex setting, and introduce the local regret as the alternative performance measure. We then apply this framework to stochastic settings, and show theoretically that it enjoys a logarithmic local regret, and is robust to any hyperparameter initialization. The empirical test on a real-world task demonstrates its superiority compared with traditional methods. Zhenxun Zhuang, Yunlong Wang 0010, Kezi Yu, Songtao Lu |
ICASSP | 1 |
| 2019 | Surrogate Losses for Online Learning of Stepsizes in Stochastic Non-Convex OptimizationabstractStochastic Gradient Descent (SGD) has played a central role in machine learning. However, it requires a carefully hand-picked stepsize for fast convergence, which is notoriously tedious and time-consuming to tune. Over the last several years, a plethora of adaptive gradient-based algorithms have emerged to ameliorate this problem. In this paper, we propose new surrogate losses to cast the problem of learning the optimal stepsizes for the stochastic optimization of a non-convex smooth objective function onto an online convex optimization problem. This allows the use of no-regret online algorithms to compute optimal stepsizes on the fly. In turn, this results in a SGD algorithm with self-tuned stepsizes that guarantees convergence rates that are automatically adaptive to the level of noise. Zhenxun Zhuang, Ashok Cutkosky, Francesco Orabona |
ICML | 1 |