Demo Data from VLDB 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Olivier Fortineau
dblp:234/8554
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Trustworthy machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
fairness |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fairwashing: the risk of rationalization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairwashing |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fairwashing: the risk of rationalization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fairwashing: the risk of rationalization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › interpretability › post-hoc explanation
model-agnostic explanation |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | Fairwashing: the risk of rationalization · ICML 2019 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › fairness
fairness evaluation |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | Fairwashing: the risk of rationalization · ICML 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
rule list enumeration · 0.4regularization · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | Fairwashing: the risk of rationalizationabstractBlack-box explanation is the problem of explaining how a machine learning model – whose internal logic is hidden to the auditor and generally complex – produces its outcomes. Current approaches for solving this problem include model explanation, outcome explanation as well as model inspection. While these techniques can be beneficial by providing interpretability, they can be used in a negative manner to perform fairwashing, which we define as promoting the false perception that a machine learning model respects some ethical values. In particular, we demonstrate that it is possible to systematically rationalize decisions taken by an unfair black-box model using the model explanation as well as the outcome explanation approaches with a given fairness metric. Our solution, LaundryML, is based on a regularized rule list enumeration algorithm whose objective is to search for fair rule lists approximating an unfair black-box model. We empirically evaluate our rationalization technique on black-box models trained on real-world datasets and show that one can obtain rule lists with high fidelity to the black-box model while being considerably less unfair at the same time. Ulrich Aïvodji, Hiromi Arai, Olivier Fortineau, Sébastien Gambs, Satoshi Hara 0001, Alain Tapp |
ICML | 3 |