Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mikko A. Heikkilä

dblp:234/8869 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
2as first author
2since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0001-5753-8643ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 2 first-author · 2 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Trustworthy machine learning · 68% Speech recognition and synthesis · 22% Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 10%
Network and information security
3 papers
Privacy and data protection · 100%
Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
1 paper
Distributed systems · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › robustness evaluation
corruption robustness benchmark
0.912025
Speech Robust Bench: A Robustness Benchmark For Speech Recognition · ICLR 2025
Natural language and speech › Speech recognition and synthesis › automatic speech recognition › robust speech recognition
noise-robust speech recognition
0.912025
Speech Robust Bench: A Robustness Benchmark For Speech Recognition · ICLR 2025
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
robustness
0.912025
Speech Robust Bench: A Robustness Benchmark For Speech Recognition · ICLR 2025
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy › differentially private learning
differentially private bayesian inference
0.722019
Differentially Private Markov Chain Monte Carlo · NeurIPS 2019
Differentially private Bayesian learning on distributed data · NIPS 2017
Privacy and data protection
differential privacy
0.722019
Differentially Private Markov Chain Monte Carlo · NeurIPS 2019
Differentially private Bayesian learning on distributed data · NIPS 2017
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo
0.412019
Differentially Private Markov Chain Monte Carlo · NeurIPS 2019
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
differentially private learning
0.412019
Representation transfer for differentially private drug sensitivity prediction · Bioinform. 2019
Distributed systems › distributed machine learning › federated learning
secure aggregation
0.312017
Differentially private Bayesian learning on distributed data · NIPS 2017
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › drug response prediction
cancer drug response prediction
0.112019
Representation transfer for differentially private drug sensitivity prediction · Bioinform. 2019
Bioinformatics and computational biology › drug discovery › drug response prediction
drug sensitivity prediction
0.112019
Representation transfer for differentially private drug sensitivity prediction · Bioinform. 2019

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

robustness evaluation · 0.9input perturbation · 0.9variational autoencoder · 0.8rényi differential privacy · 0.8random projection · 0.8principal component analysis · 0.8data subsampling · 0.8secure multi-party sum · 0.6gaussian mechanism · 0.6
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 Speech Robust Bench: A Robustness Benchmark For Speech Recognition
abstract
As Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) models become ever more pervasive, it is important to ensure that they make reliable predictions under corruptions present in the physical and digital world. We propose Speech Robust Bench (SRB), a comprehensive benchmark for evaluating the robustness of ASR models to diverse corruptions. SRB is composed of 114 input perturbations which simulate an heterogeneous range of corruptions that ASR models may encounter when deployed in the wild. We use SRB to evaluate the robustness of several state-of-the-art ASR models and observe that model size and certain modeling choices such as the use of discrete representations, or self-training appear to be conducive to robustness. We extend this analysis to measure the robustness of ASR models on data from various demographic subgroups, namely English and Spanish speakers, and males and females. Our results revealed noticeable disparities in the model's robustness across subgroups. We believe that SRB will significantly facilitate future research towards robust ASR models, by making it easier to conduct comprehensive and comparable robustness evaluations.
Muhammad A. Shah, David Solans Noguero, Mikko A. Heikkilä, Bhiksha Raj, Nicolas Kourtellis
ICLR3
2024 PUFFLE: Balancing Privacy, Utility, and Fairness in Federated Learning
abstract
Training and deploying Machine Learning models that simultaneously adhere to principles of fairness and privacy while ensuring good utility poses a significant challenge. The interplay between these three factors of trustworthiness is frequently underestimated and remains insufficiently explored. Consequently, many efforts focus on ensuring only two of these factors, neglecting one in the process. The decentralization of the datasets and the variations in distributions among the clients exacerbate the complexity of achieving this ethical trade-off in the context of Federated Learning (FL). For the first time in FL literature, we address these three factors of trustworthiness. We introduce PUFFLE, a high-level parameterised approach that can help in the exploration of the balance between utility, privacy, and fairness in FL scenarios. We prove that PUFFLE can be effective across diverse datasets, models, and data distributions, reducing the model unfairness up to 75%, with a maximum reduction in the utility of 17% in the worst-case scenario, while maintaining strict privacy guarantees during the FL training.
Luca Corbucci, Mikko A. Heikkilä, David Solans Noguero, Anna Monreale, Nicolas Kourtellis
ECAI2
2019 Differentially Private Markov Chain Monte Carlo
abstract
Recent developments in differentially private (DP) machine learning and DP Bayesian learning have enabled learning under strong privacy guarantees for the training data subjects. In this paper, we further extend the applicability of DP Bayesian learning by presenting the first general DP Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) algorithm whose privacy-guarantees are not subject to unrealistic assumptions on Markov chain convergence and that is applicable to posterior inference in arbitrary models. Our algorithm is based on a decomposition of the Barker acceptance test that allows evaluating the Rényi DP privacy cost of the accept-reject choice. We further show how to improve the DP guarantee through data subsampling and approximate acceptance tests.
Mikko A. Heikkilä, Joonas Jälkö, Onur Dikmen, Antti Honkela
NeurIPS1
2019 Representation transfer for differentially private drug sensitivity prediction
abstract
MOTIVATION: Human genomic datasets often contain sensitive information that limits use and sharing of the data. In particular, simple anonymization strategies fail to provide sufficient level of protection for genomic data, because the data are inherently identifiable. Differentially private machine learning can help by guaranteeing that the published results do not leak too much information about any individual data point. Recent research has reached promising results on differentially private drug sensitivity prediction using gene expression data. Differentially private learning with genomic data is challenging because it is more difficult to guarantee privacy in high dimensions. Dimensionality reduction can help, but if the dimension reduction mapping is learned from the data, then it needs to be differentially private too, which can carry a significant privacy cost. Furthermore, the selection of any hyperparameters (such as the target dimensionality) needs to also avoid leaking private information. RESULTS: We study an approach that uses a large public dataset of similar type to learn a compact representation for differentially private learning. We compare three representation learning methods: variational autoencoders, principal component analysis and random projection. We solve two machine learning tasks on gene expression of cancer cell lines: cancer type classification, and drug sensitivity prediction. The experiments demonstrate significant benefit from all representation learning methods with variational autoencoders providing the most accurate predictions most often. Our results significantly improve over previous state-of-the-art in accuracy of differentially private drug sensitivity prediction. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: Code used in the experiments is available at https://github.com/DPBayes/dp-representation-transfer.
Teppo Niinimaki, Mikko A. Heikkilä, Antti Honkela, Samuel Kaski
Bioinform.2
2017 Differentially private Bayesian learning on distributed data
abstract
Many applications of machine learning, for example in health care, would benefit from methods that can guarantee privacy of data subjects. Differential privacy (DP) has become established as a standard for protecting learning results. The standard DP algorithms require a single trusted party to have access to the entire data, which is a clear weakness, or add prohibitive amounts of noise. We consider DP Bayesian learning in a distributed setting, where each party only holds a single sample or a few samples of the data. We propose a learning strategy based on a secure multi-party sum function for aggregating summaries from data holders and the Gaussian mechanism for DP. Our method builds on an asymptotically optimal and practically efficient DP Bayesian inference with rapidly diminishing extra cost.
Mikko A. Heikkilä, Eemil Lagerspetz, Samuel Kaski, Kana Shimizu, Sasu Tarkoma, Antti Honkela
NIPS1