VLDB 2026 Research / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alexandre Teiller
dblp:234/9141
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
2since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Theory of computation · 4 · 2 since 2021
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Multistage knapsackabstractMany systems have to be maintained while the underlying constraints, costs and/or profits change over time. Although the state of a system may evolve during time, a non-negligible transition cost is incurred for transitioning from one state to another. In order to model such situations, we look at a recently introduced multistage model where the input is a sequence of instances (one for each time step), and the goal is to find a sequence of solutions (one for each time step) that are both (i) near optimal for each time step and (ii) as stable as possible. We propose a PTAS for the Multistage Knapsack problem. This is the first approximation scheme for a combinatorial optimization problem in the considered multistage setting, and its existence contrasts with the inapproximability results for other combinatorial optimization problems that are even polynomial-time solvable in the static case. Evripidis Bampis, Bruno Escoffier, Alexandre Teiller |
J. Comput. Syst. Sci. | 3 |
| 2021 | Online Multistage Subset Maximization ProblemsabstractNumerous combinatorial optimization problems (knapsack, maximum-weight matching, etc.) can be expressed as subset maximization problems: One is given a ground set $$N=\{1,\dots ,n\}$$ , a collection $$\mathcal {F}\subseteq 2^N$$ of subsets thereof such that $$\emptyset \in \mathcal {F}$$ , and an objective (profit) function $$p:\mathcal {F}\rightarrow \mathbb {R}_+$$ . The task is to choose a set $$S\in \mathcal {F}$$ that maximizes p(S). We consider the multistage version (Eisenstat et al., Gupta et al., both ICALP 2014) of such problems: The profit function $$p_t$$ (and possibly the set of feasible solutions $$\mathcal {F}_t$$ ) may change over time. Since in many applications changing the solution is costly, the task becomes to find a sequence of solutions that optimizes the trade-off between good per-time solutions and stable solutions taking into account an additional similarity bonus. As similarity measure for two consecutive solutions, we consider either the size of the intersection of the two solutions or the difference of n and the Hamming distance between the two characteristic vectors. We study multistage subset maximization problems in the online setting, that is, $$p_t$$ (along with possibly $$\mathcal {F}_t$$ ) only arrive one by one and, upon such an arrival, the online algorithm has to output the corresponding solution without knowledge of the future. We develop general techniques for online multistage subset maximization and thereby characterize those models (given by the type of data evolution and the type of similarity measure) that admit a constant-competitive online algorithm. When no constant competitive ratio is possible, we employ lookahead to circumvent this issue. When a constant competitive ratio is possible, we provide almost matching lower and upper bounds on the best achievable one. Evripidis Bampis, Bruno Escoffier, Kevin Schewior, Alexandre Teiller |
Algorithmica | 4 |
| 2019 | Online Multistage Subset Maximization Problems
Evripidis Bampis, Bruno Escoffier, Kevin Schewior, Alexandre Teiller |
ESA | 4 |
| 2019 | Multistage Knapsack
Evripidis Bampis, Bruno Escoffier, Alexandre Teiller |
MFCS | 3 |